On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
> Perhaps my just-posted message has too many words to see my point.
>
> In the paragraph above, marked >>>, which was written by you, you
> speak of deception and forgery. Nothing in the reports of the
> recent incident involving Martin suggests any decept
> Have fun with updating the library, it won't affect depending packages.
> :) Some times are that easy to solve, you know?
Ok, will upload today :)
pgpHAIvddyz9K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi!
Sorry for late response.
* "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-24 12:10]:
>> However, contrary to what the NM templates suggest, symbol versioning
>> is not a cure-all for all ABI incompatibilities. If libetpan returns
>> a DB_ENV * in its API, you need to port[1] a
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Andreas Fester schrieb:
>
>> I create a new package with the new name which will
>> get uploaded to the NEW queue. This package replaces the
>> old package and conflicts with the old package:
>> Replaces: oldPackage
>> Conflicts: oldPackage (<< f
Hi
On Tue, 30 May 2006 11:22:51 +0200
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Steve Langasek schrieb:
>
> >>Package: oldpkg
> >>Depends: newpkg
> >>Description: transitional dummy package
> >
> >>Package: newpkg
> >>Replaces: oldpkg
> >>Conflicts: oldpkg
> >>Description: ...
>
> >
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:25:58AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Christoph Haas schrieb:
>
> >>* NTP server
> >> (some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
> >> NTP Team, which consists of zero active members)
>
> >I'd take my chance on this one. There is a large number o
Hi,
Christoph Haas schrieb:
* NTP server
(some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
NTP Team, which consists of zero active members)
I'd take my chance on this one. There is a large number of bugs open and
I believe that this package is very important. Still I'd li
Hi,
Steve Langasek schrieb:
Package: oldpkg
Depends: newpkg
Description: transitional dummy package
Package: newpkg
Replaces: oldpkg
Conflicts: oldpkg
Description: ...
*NO* *NO* *NO* *NO* *NO*. Look closely at the package relationships you've
specified. Why would you upload a package to
[Benjamin Seidenberg]
> FYI:
> 12:33 < Ganneff> and for all those impatient waiting for NEW: i will
> clear that in my jetlag time, in those nights i
> cant sleep (ie 1st -> 2nd june, 2-> 3) :)
Sounds good, but do not really addresses the fundamental problem here
Morning...
Matthias, your "From:" line appears to be missing. Or my MUA is b0rked.
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:29:34PM +0200, wrote:
> * NTP server
> (some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
> NTP Team, which consists of zero active members)
I'd take my chance on t
On 5/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am sorry (and not happy with myself) that I've been procrastinating
about this for too long. This decision has not been easy. However,
I need to focus more on (a) work that actually feeds my kids, and
(b) time that is *not* spent hacking.
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course, but I'm just talking about getting a basic environment set
up from scratch. I realise slind removes the need for that now, but...
I'm not insisting on you using slind, I just want to convince people
to contribute to it. :)
--
I am fr
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:23:44AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Andreas Fester schrieb:
> >I create a new package with the new name which will
> >get uploaded to the NEW queue. This package replaces the
> >old package and conflicts with the old package:
> >Replaces: oldPackage
> >Conflicts: oldP
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just make a list of everything you have installed and rebuild each
package one-by-one until you've covered everything. I can't see where
the problem is.
In the real world (tm) building things by hand is not acceptable because of
a) complicated bu
Hi,
* NTP server
(some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
NTP Team, which consists of zero active members)
I'll take it.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
Andreas Fester schrieb:
I create a new package with the new name which will
get uploaded to the NEW queue. This package replaces the
old package and conflicts with the old package:
Replaces: oldPackage
Conflicts: oldPackage (<< firstVersionOfNewPackage)
IIRC the correct way to do that is
On 5/30/06, Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I do think it would be really nice is to have a "contrib-builds"
SLIND repository (like backports do). This would make things easier for
sharing this effort.
Will be there Real Soon Now (tm). Hardware is already at the desk, I
just need t
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:00:21AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> binNMU & recompilation: won't break if the app really works with this
> >> older
> >> version and the lib must be ABI-compatible anyway.
> > ... and this one is plainly wrong. binNMUs for rebuild against
> > dependency lib
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 29 May 2006, at 23:53, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Yes, I can see that could be handy. I'm guessing SLIND is based on
woody?
No, it is based on testing/unstable. Host part is mostly sarge (it was
in the 0.1 prerelease, now most of it is sid).
Well i
On 30 May 2006, at 09:12, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just make a list of everything you have installed and rebuild each
package one-by-one until you've covered everything. I can't see where
the problem is.
In the real world (tm) building things
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hendrik Sattler wrote:
>> Am Montag, 29. Mai 2006 21:16 schrieb Thomas Viehmann:
>>> Hendrik Sattler wrote:
No, but you could manually set all stuff in Depends to the needed
versions. That would also work for the buildds, I guess.
>>> And bre
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:47:53PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Or just dump all packages into the buildds queue file (as
>
> That would be ~buildd/build/REDO
>
>> package_version, one per line) and start it.
>
> That would be
>
> package_vers
On 30 May 2006, at 08:53, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 29 May 2006, at 23:53, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Yes, I can see that could be handy. I'm guessing SLIND is based on
woody?
No, it is based on testing/unstable. Host part is mostly sarge (it was
On 29 May 2006, at 23:53, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Seg, 2006-05-29 às 22:08 +0100, Chris Boot escreveu:
SLIND sounds interesting indeed, I've been using a buildroot-built
system for mine so it was difficult getting dpkg built in the first
place, but I've got it mostly all going. All the arch-inde
Hi!
You wrote:
> * videogen
> (easy pickings)
If no one else is interested, I'd like to take this one.
It could take me a few weeks to find time to upload though, as Real Life
is getting in the way atm.
--
Kind regards,
++
101 - 125 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
