On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 07:34:02AM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 08:37:52PM -0400, LEE, Yui-wah (Clement) wrote:
> > I am building a package in which one of the binary has
> > to have the setuid and setgid bits set. I wonder which
> > one of the following two is
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo skrev:
3. Use dpkg-statoverride in your postinst script.
Don't do this, just ship the file in the package with the correct
permissions. dpkg-statoverride is (mostly) an admin tool which lets you
change default permissions.
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The copyright link is missing (http://wiki.debian.net/copyright.html)
but the copyright was broken anyway (see
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWikiIsNotGFDL). What is the copyright
on the wiki, and where is the correct link to the copyright notice,
that
Steinar H. Gunderson skrev:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 07:25:16PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) compile docs pre-build-time; or
2) compile docs in build-time
Definitely the latter. We build stuff at build time for a reason,
architecture-specific or -independent alike.
That depends a bit o
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 08:37:52PM -0400, LEE, Yui-wah (Clement) wrote:
> I am building a package in which one of the binary has
> to have the setuid and setgid bits set. I wonder which
> one of the following two is the more appropriate method
> to use?
>
> 1. Use "install -m 6755 " in the insta
Bugs that were fixed or are to be fixed (even in unstable) shouldn't be tagged
wontfix.
What's the problem with simply marking the bugs as fixed in the right version?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Почта
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tony mancill wrote:
>
> It seems like it would be quite taxing on the autobuilders to have to pull
> something like docbook (and its chain of dependencies) into a pbuilder just
> to recompile a manpage that doesn't change between architectures.
>
AIUI, the autobuilders use sbuild and don't purge
Hi,
> >
> > # apt-get install refit (when it enters past the NEW queue)
> > # gptsync /dev/sda
> >
> > I've temporarily put refit packages on:
> > http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/tmp/20060702/
>
> I chrooted into /target from the second console of d-i and
> copied the deb package I got from yo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philip Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: alienbbc
Version : 1.0.5
Upstream Author : Jules Taplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.x2systems.com/AlienBBC/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Descriptio
Hi,
I am building a package in which one of the binary has
to have the setuid and setgid bits set. I wonder which
one of the following two is the more appropriate method
to use?
1. Use "install -m 6755 " in the install
target of the Makefile.
However, I already tried this method and it d
tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 07:25:16PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> 1) compile docs pre-build-time; or
>>> 2) compile docs in build-time
>>
>> Definitely the latter. We build stuff at build time for a reason,
>> archite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 07:25:16PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 1) compile docs pre-build-time; or
>> 2) compile docs in build-time
>
> Definitely the latter. We build stuff at build time for a reason,
> architectu
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 07:25:16PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1) compile docs pre-build-time; or
> 2) compile docs in build-time
Definitely the latter. We build stuff at build time for a reason,
architecture-specific or -independent alike.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
My dillema:
1) compile docs pre-build-time; or
2) compile docs in build-time
Pros of 1: < build-time and < Build-Depends
Pros of 2: < diff.gz and unnecessary manual intervention of downstream
maintainer (me :) )
So, what are best practices
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 02:38:30PM +0200, "Uwe A. P. Würdinger" wrote:
> James Westby schrieb:
> >An estimate of the pacakages that generate a certificate in postinst
> >(lets hope there are none that include them in the package) I tried:
> >
> >$ grep-available -FDepends openssl -sPackage -n | sor
James Westby schrieb:
On (03/07/06 23:34), Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Jaldhar H. Vyas]
Is this is a good idea for Debian? I think it is but it doesn't make
sense to switch dovecot over unless all the other ssl-cert using
packages also do it. Is this possible in the etch timeframe?
Yes, it is
Hi,
Joe Smith schrieb:
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
AIUI, there is no need to CC debian-devel with ITP's, as debian-devel
normally gets them anyway.
Not quite. X-Debbugs-Cc: is how debian-devel gets a copy of ITPs.
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
"Baruch Even" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
AIUI, there is no need to CC debian-devel with ITP's, as debian-devel
normally gets them anyway.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Free Ekanayaka) writes:
> This package contains a collection of drumkits for Hydrogen, a
> sample based drum machine/step sequencer.
>
This is not a single package but actually a collection of various
packages. I once packaged Erny's Percussion for private purposes and
noted
Hi
On 7/3/06, Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I would like to use 'sim' package name for kde version and 'sim-qt'
>> > for qt-only version.
>> Also, wouldn't it be less confusing if the packages were named sim-kde
>> and sim-qt?
Why not name it sim-qt-only or -nokde like gnuplot-nox.
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.03.2319 +0200]:
>> I have in the past had a server on a local area network where the
>> network administrators refused to assign a static IP address. But
>> they would set things up to promis
Vivo a maior cobertura do Brasil!!
Promoção vivo e você na copa do mundo.
Você foi sorteado na promoção Vivo.
Esse email está com um vale presente Vivo.
Para participar é facil, não importa sua operadora,
a vivo esta sempre com você.
É só baixar o vale-presente e responder a seguinte per
23 matches
Mail list logo
