On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Brian May [Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:22:55 +1000]:
>
> > Adeodate> Also, do you remember having root
> > Adeodato> bzr as root?
>
> > Huh?
>
> Sorry, that should have read: "do you remember having *run* bzr as root".
> It's the most likely cause fo
> Le jeudi 17 août 2006 à 11:48 -0400, Anthony L. Bryan a écrit :
> > Metalinks might be helpful on Debian's download page for
> CD/DVD images. You
> > could have a single quick link to your ISOs that contains all the
> > mirror/p2p/checksum info in it.
> >
> > Metalinks, a cross platform vendor
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 08:06:37AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Roberto C. Sanchez [Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:45:30 -0400]:
>
> > Interesting. My previous attempt at solving this was to have mutt
> > explicitly set the Return-Path header. However, it did not work. I
> > don't know if it was becaus
* Roberto C. Sanchez [Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:45:30 -0400]:
> Interesting. My previous attempt at solving this was to have mutt
> explicitly set the Return-Path header. However, it did not work. I
> don't know if it was because postfix on my gateway host stripped it or
> rewrote it, or if it is jus
On Sun August 27 2006 18:55, you wrote:
> Deferring to Ubuntu for this work is the worst sort of defeatist
> nonsense and I will not to bow to it. I like collaborating with the
> Ubuntu people, but I refuse to compromise my own work or Debian as a
> project just so that they can excel.
I think you
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 07:38:56AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Martijn van Oosterhout [Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:22:40 +0200]:
>
> > I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think it matters what domain, the
> > address just has to exist. I think that they're checking your Sender
> > header (which is where bo
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 07:22:40AM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>
> I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think it matters what domain, the
> address just has to exist. I think that they're checking your Sender
> header (which is where bounces get sent) for validity. I remember
> dealing with thi
David Nusinow wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 10:37:58PM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
>> On Sun August 27 2006 06:47, Sander Marechal wrote:
>>> * Desktop - basic: Simple minimal GNOME installation pretty much as
>>> it is now, maybe with even less software preinstalled. (I was
>>> surprised by the am
* Martijn van Oosterhout [Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:22:40 +0200]:
> I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think it matters what domain, the
> address just has to exist. I think that they're checking your Sender
> header (which is where bounces get sent) for validity.
Almost. They're checking his envelope-from
> "Adeodato" == Adeodato <"=?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> writes:
Adeodato> Sorry, that should have read: "do you remember having
Adeodato> *run* bzr as root". It's the most likely cause for
Adeodato> those .pyc files to be there, since bzrtools did not.
No -
On 8/28/06, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What the message suggests to me is that the other machines in your
> domain should be using address rewriting if they are sending from
> unroutable addresses.
Except that there are multiple domains hosted from my network. Which
should
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 10:37:58PM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> On Sun August 27 2006 06:47, Sander Marechal wrote:
> > * Desktop - basic: Simple minimal GNOME installation pretty much as
> > it is now, maybe with even less software preinstalled. (I was
> > surprised by the ammount of software that c
On Sun August 27 2006 06:47, Sander Marechal wrote:
> Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > It's all about expectations. Always keep in mind that the target
> > group differs a lot between Ubuntu and Debian.
>
> I wouldn't say they differ. Ubuntu targets only a small subset of
> Debian users. Maybe Debian sho
* Brian May [Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:22:55 +1000]:
> Adeodate> Also, do you remember having root
> Adeodato> bzr as root?
> Huh?
Sorry, that should have read: "do you remember having *run* bzr as root".
It's the most likely cause for those .pyc files to be there, since
bzrtools did not.
Tha
> "Adeodato" == Adeodato <"=?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> writes:
Adeodato> Hm. I'd say that you have .pyc files left in:
Adeodato>
Adeodato> /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/bzrtools
Adeodato> Can you check, please?
Yes, see below.
Ad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Crilly wrote:
> On 08/26/06 03:26:12PM +, Sam Morris wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 16:02:04 +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
>>> Am Samstag 26 August 2006 15:15 schrieb Theodore Tso:
No support for: (The * are critical)
* SATA Hard
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 02:18:12AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Roberto C. Sanchez said:
> > Is the mailing list software on Alioth broken or misconfigured? If I
> > send from any host on my network other than the one which happens to be
> > the mail server, I get this
On 08/26/06 03:26:12PM +, Sam Morris wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 16:02:04 +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > Am Samstag 26 August 2006 15:15 schrieb Theodore Tso:
> >> No support for: (The * are critical)
> >>
> >>* SATA Hard Drives (*)
> >>* Intel AD1981 HD Audio (*)
> >
> > This stuf
This one time, at band camp, Roberto C. Sanchez said:
> Is the mailing list software on Alioth broken or misconfigured? If I
> send from any host on my network other than the one which happens to be
> the mail server, I get this error when I send to an Alioth list:
>
> Aug 27 17:26:48 santiago po
Søndag 27 august 2006 23:48, skrev Hendrik Sattler:
> > - Kernel 2.16.2 (2.6.15)
>
> That cannot be correct.
Correction. I forgot the digit #6 :
Kernel 2.6.16-2 (2.6.15)
- K
On 8/28/06, Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Sonntag 27 August 2006 23:30 schrieb Knut Yrvin:
> A list of version numbers on important software packages on the test
> version of Debian-edu/Skolelinux (The Kubuntu Dapper version number in
> parenthesis):
>
> - Kernel 2.16.2 (2.6.15)
Am Sonntag 27 August 2006 23:30 schrieb Knut Yrvin:
> A list of version numbers on important software packages on the test
> version of Debian-edu/Skolelinux (The Kubuntu Dapper version number in
> parenthesis):
>
> - Kernel 2.16.2 (2.6.15)
That cannot be correct.
HS
Is the mailing list software on Alioth broken or misconfigured? If I
send from any host on my network other than the one which happens to be
the mail server, I get this error when I send to an Alioth list:
Aug 27 17:26:48 santiago postfix/smtp[23682]: 4A8002403D:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
relay=lis
Lørdag 26 august 2006 15:15, skrev Theodore Tso:
> No support for: (The * are critical)
>
> * SATA Hard Drives (*)
> * IPW3945 wireless (*)
> * Intel AD1981 HD Audio (*)
> * 3D Graphics support on the ATI FireGL V5200 card
> (propietary kernel module)
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> So you clearly show to not understand the issue: almost every piece of
> hardware uses a non-free firmware. Either uploaded after power-on or
> semi-permanently stored on it.
But then again, Debian doesn't ship that hardware.
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Version: 0.9-1
* Brian May [Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:43:24 +1000]:
> Robert> Could you please run 'bzr upgrade' while using bzr
> Robert> 0.9rc1. If my guess at your situation is right this will
> Robert> take a while to run, but correct your performance issues.
> >> Did I do somethin
[It's been a while since this message hit the debtags-devel list, thus I
include an almost full quote as well as CCing the participants of the
discussion, please follow up on debtags-devel@ or CC it in responses]
[Response below]
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 17:14 +, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
> The f
This stuff did not even exist when Sarge was released. Half of userland would
not fit this hardware, so who cares.
Everyone who would like to install a stable Debian release on hardware
currently available for purchase.
And this non-free stuff is nothing to discuss about.
Good for you - pe
maybe backports should be considered a 1st class part of Debian; so
in addition to old-stable, stable, testing, and unstable, we could
add, "stable-useful". The fact of the matter is that the stable
distribution today is pretty much useless for desktop users, and
useless for people who need to in
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
>>> - something useful like ifplugd was not installed and the user was
>>> puzzled by the fact that plugging in the network cable did not
>>> result in network access
>> I agree that it would be nice if ifplugd or laptop-net were installed
>> by default, but last I checked De
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 12:03:25PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Sonntag 27 August 2006 07:05 schrieb Theodore Tso:
> > >From the menubar. System --> Administration --> Synaptic Package Manager
>
> Funny, Synaptic was not installed but something called adept. Guess what you
> have to do to
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:45:26AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>[...] upstream considered it completely unacceptable for anyone to
>ship python in such a state that users would end up with less than the
>full python suite installed on their system. [...]
In fairness, Perl upstream had similar pr
So can we do this? Load kernel modules or even extra udebs from a
CD/floppy/usb stick/URL that the user provides during the installation
process?
Now I think about it, I seem to remember doing this back with
boot-floppies, to get an e1000 network controller to be recognised by the
installer, IIRC.
Am Sonntag 27 August 2006 07:05 schrieb Theodore Tso:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 04:02:04PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > - installer did not read in the CDs for package lists and the GUI does
> > not even support this (or for any other means of modifying
> > /etc/apt/sources.list)
> >
> >From t
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 11:09:39PM -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> I know previously I said I thought that firmware didn't matter for
> freeness, but I've been convinced by the arguments here that I was
> wrong. Anyway, what I really wanted to say is [...]
I don't think this is on-topic on debia
On Aug 27, Daniel Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know previously I said I thought that firmware didn't matter for
> freeness, but I've been convinced by the arguments here that I was
> wrong. Anyway, what I really wanted to say is that as a user (who
> hopes to get time to contribute, m
> "Adeodato" == Adeodato <"=?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> writes:
Robert> Could you please run 'bzr upgrade' while using bzr
Robert> 0.9rc1. If my guess at your situation is right this will
Robert> take a while to run, but correct your performance issues.
>
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 01:05:56AM -0400, Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I agree that it would be nice if ifplugd or laptop-net were installed
> by default, but last I checked Debian didn't install either by
> default, either. So what's your point?
Aren't they part of the laptop task,
38 matches
Mail list logo
