On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 01:52:12PM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On 9/9/06, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I have been using noatime for quite awhile now. mount(8) does not
> >mention nodiratime anywhere, and I have never used it.
>
> Same here. But googling for nodiratime shows it'
On 9/9/06, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been using noatime for quite awhile now. mount(8) does not
mention nodiratime anywhere, and I have never used it.
Same here. But googling for nodiratime shows it's definitely in the
kernel, and in wide use. Learned something today...
c
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> A quick way out is to reinstall all the packages with scripts in
> /etc/init.d/.
This way proved to be too quick, trying to reinstall removed but not
purged packages with init.d scripts left behind in /etc/init.d/. I
recommend using something like this instead, to only rei
Hi,
I've discovered that my adopted packages dbskkd-cdb and skksearch
use `command -v'.
Is `command -v' accepted for `/bin/sh' maintainer scripts?
AFAIK, `command -v' is defined by POSIX UPE (user portability extension),
"Debian Policy" section 10.4 says `/bin/sh' should only use POSIX features,
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Those with packages being broken from this bug can fix it by using
> 'apt-get --reinstall install package' on the affected packages. A
> quick way out is to reinstall all the packages with scripts in
> /etc/init.d/.
>
> for p in `dpkg -S /etc/init.d/*|cut -d: -f1|so
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 14:58:10 -0300
"Daniel Morales" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Daniel!
> Hello everyone. I'm Daniel from Uruguay, new at the debian-devel mail list.
> I'm a Debian user form a few years ago.. and i verry like this operating
> sistem. I been used it in the work and in home
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:17:00PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 08 September 2006 19:36, John Goerzen wrote:
> > I have no idea what Gnome, KDE, etc. are doing to my disk -- all I know
> > is that they seem to have business with it all the time, and it makes it
> > very difficul
Hi,
On Friday 08 September 2006 19:36, John Goerzen wrote:
> I have no idea what Gnome, KDE, etc. are doing to my disk -- all I know
> is that they seem to have business with it all the time, and it makes it
> very difficult for the disk to spin down.
do you mount with "noatime" und "nodiratime"?
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-xattr
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://svn.red-bean.com/bob/xattr/releases/xattr-0.2/
* License : MIT/PSF
Programmi
[David Balazic]
> I noticed, that when the debian installer is instructed to create two
> partitions, whose joint size is less than the size of the disk, then
> it creates one primary partition and one logical partition inside an
> extended partition.
cfdisk does the same thing - however, it also
In version 2.86.ds1-16 of the sysv-rc package released 2006-09-06, the
update-rc.d script was broken. When used to to update symlinks it
would remove all symlinks for a init.d script if such symlinks
existed, and add them if they were missing. This broke all packages
being upgraded after the new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Daniel,
Daniel Morales wrote:
> Hello everyone. I'm Daniel from Uruguay, new at the debian-devel mail
> list. I'm a Debian user form a few years ago.. and i verry like this
> operating sistem. I been used it in the work and in home and allways
>
Hello everyone. I'm Daniel from Uruguay, new at the debian-devel mail list. I'm a Debian user form a few years ago.. and i verry like this operating sistem. I been used it in the work and in home and allways without big problems. ;)
Now, if i can contribute with something at the dev level.. im at
Hi all,
Since I no longer really use Window Maker much, I am orphaning the
wmakerconf and wmakerconf-data packages (cf. the CC'ed bugs). I've just
emailed the BTS to retitle those bugs from RFA to O, and uploaded new
packages with the maintainer set to Debian QA Group. Note that each of
these is
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 08:17:09PM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
One other thing here -- and I would argue perhaps even more important --
is hard disk access. I've spent quite some time tuning that, and with
traditional services (cron, MTAs, syslog, etc.) it's a bit
time-consuming but possible.
I h
Dear dictionary maintainers and other developers,
Stardict is a dictionary reader, it provides 'scan selection word'
function which gives the translations in a pop-up window immediately.
Because it needs pop-up a search result immediately, the DICT protocol
cannot be satisfied. So it uses its own
Using strace, I discovered many programs are constantly busy these
days. No wonder one can't seem to save power. There ought to be a law...
=
Subject: Re: silent PC vs. emacs
Newsgroup: gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs
From: Dan Nicolaescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...The OLPC/Fedora people are working on e
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libnet-lite-ftp-perl
Version : 0.47
Upstream Author : Dariush Pietrzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/~eyck/Net-Lite-FTP-0.47/lib/Net/Lite/FTP.pm
* License
also sprach Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.08.1554 +0200]:
> wiki pages take seconds to update or check.
They also create locking problems.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer,
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 12:16:05PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006, martin f krafft wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > we're in the middle of the BSPMarathon[0]. Among the things new this
> > year (as opposed to the sarge BSPs) are usertags for claiming bugs
> > [1]. Unfortunately, the
also sprach Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.08.1527 +0200]:
> Only a web form that instantaneously report that I claim the bug would
> have any chance to be usefull. Using the BTS (in its current reactivity
> and implementation at least) for interactive tasks is IMHO a bad idea.
> A
Le ven 8 septembre 2006 14:40, martin f krafft a écrit :
> also sprach Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.08.1233 +0200]:
> > I don't think we need more than one tag per claim.
>
> So how to prevent deadlocks? With many people bug squashing at the
> same time, we cannot rely on chaos anymo
also sprach Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.08.1233 +0200]:
> I don't think we need more than one tag per claim.
So how to prevent deadlocks? With many people bug squashing at the
same time, we cannot rely on chaos anymore.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the
[Wouter Verhelst]
> My point being that you don't want to list them as hard dependencies
> unless you really need udev and can't work with static devices for
> some other reason.
I suspect very few packages should depend on udev. Most packages
depend on local and remote file systems being mounte
Re: martin f krafft 2006-09-08 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Please see #385957, and the discussion between Julian and myself.
>
> Basically, we thought about two solutions, and I came up with
> a third one last night.
>
> 1. Julian proposes to simply to encode the information about a BSP
> into t
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 310 (new: 3)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 105 (new: 2)
Total number of packages request
On 9/5/06, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was initially going to just provide libfl.a with position
independent code, which would have prevented the FTBS breakage for
scanner containing shared libraries, at the expense of a register
lost for binaries that were otherwise
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 05:09:49PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 07, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 03:11:02PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > Now, try thinking about how many of the blocks which are not listed
> > > as depending on udev actually do
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.02.1518 +0200]:
> Independently, I was considering that it would make a lot of sense
> for each attendant to prepare for the BSP, possibly by
> pre-selecting bugs to work on and ideally getting in touch with
> the maintainer of upstream as ne
[Francesco Pedrini]
> I've tried, but it doesn't work:
You need to use insserv version 1.08.0-3 or later. Sorry for
forgetting to mention that.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo /usr/share/insserv/check-initd-order -g -o
>>lsb-graph.dot
There is no need to run it as root, I believe. It only need t
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 02:45:50PM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
> So if you are to write a library that include a flex scanner, all you
> have to do is to prvide your own yywrap() function, even if it is
> just return 1; and you won't need to link with libfl.a.
Why can't flex emit a default yywra
31 matches
Mail list logo
