Le mardi 10 octobre 2006 à 07:18 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit :
> On 10/8/06, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 08, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> > > Just today mike emmel fixed the "boom" bug, it should technically
> > > possible switching to GTK+ 2.10.x.
> >
> > R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> c2d43675-9efa-4809-a4aa-af042b62786e
> [ 1 ] Choice 1: Release Etch even with kernel firmware issues
> [ 3 ] Choice 2: Special exception to DFSG2 for firmware as long as
req
On 10/8/06, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Just today mike emmel fixed the "boom" bug, it should technically
> possible switching to GTK+ 2.10.x.
Repeating this here for other readers: 2.10.6-2 in experimental was
uploaded today with th
* Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-09 12:56:03 -0600]:
> According to the chapter 3.3 of the Dev. reference the GR calls for votes
> should've been sent to the debian-devel-announce, but in reality they weren't.
> It seems that the only way to get those would be to subscribe to de
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote:
> According to the chapter 3.3 of the Dev. reference the GR calls for votes
> should've been sent to the debian-devel-announce, but in reality they weren't.
They *were* sent to the d-d-a mailinglist, check the archives.
--
"One disk to rule them
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 02:43:55PM -0400, Jim Crilly wrote:
> On 10/09/06 08:38:46AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > Jim Crilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Intel's daemon isn't as bad as the Atheros HAL or nVidia's blob
> >
> > Could you please elaborat on that? why is ath_hal.ko or
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:23:48 +0200, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >funny, i'd have said the ultimate solution was finding a way to make the
> >users learn about looking at README.Debian :)
That is, "they should be paying more attention t
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 02:39:07PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Roberto C. Sanchez]
> > That is a problem if I want to server everything up out of LDAP.
> > There really should be a "reserved" range, maybe 100-499 of Debian
> > gids, where they are assigned in a predertmined way.
>
> I don'
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 10:16:51PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> I propose another solution. Introduce init-common with wrappers:
> * /sbin/init is a binary that
> - reads a configuration file with the init system name and
> - creates a file /var/run/inittype (or whereever is can be stored a
Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> According to the chapter 3.3 of the Dev. reference the GR calls for votes
> should've been sent to the debian-devel-announce, but in reality they weren't.
> It seems that the only way to get those would be to subscribe to debian-vote
> or to trawl
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:56:03 -0600, Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> According to the chapter 3.3 of the Dev. reference the GR calls for
The dev ref is not authoritative on voting procedure.
> votes should've been sent to the debian-devel-announce, but in
> reality they
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 12:56 -0600, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote:
> According to the chapter 3.3 of the Dev. reference the GR calls for votes
> should've been sent to the debian-devel-announce, but in reality they weren't.
> It seems that the only way to get those would be to subscribe to debian-vote
This one time, at band camp, Oleksandr Moskalenko said:
> According to the chapter 3.3 of the Dev. reference the GR calls for votes
> should've been sent to the debian-devel-announce, but in reality they weren't.
> It seems that the only way to get those would be to subscribe to debian-vote
> or to
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 07:09:14PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have started working with transitioning a network to LDAP. I am still
> > experimenting with this at home before implementing it "for real." This
> > brings me to my concern. It
[Theodore Tso]
> The e2fsprogs-udeb package does include the mke2fs.conf file, so if
> the installer is using the latest e2fsprogs-udeb, it should be
> creating filesystems with the dir_index and resize_inode features.
Soon the etch installer is using the latest mkfs.ext3 to create the
file system
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 22:42 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Aurélien GÉRÔME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > As soon as I send a mail, the deamon restarts... Good news! ;)
> Yep. Thanks magic elves!
Then please help again elves! :-) The daemon is down again. :(
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNS
[Roberto C. Sanchez]
> That is a problem if I want to server everything up out of LDAP.
> There really should be a "reserved" range, maybe 100-499 of Debian
> gids, where they are assigned in a predertmined way.
I don't think it's a good idea to put system users and groups into LDAP
anyway. They
The number of machines reporting to popcon.debian.org continues to
grow. This is great. There are now 17338 machines reporting their
statistics. The package usage stats are used to order the packages on
the CDs and DVDs, among other things.
This is the current architecture distribution:
According to the chapter 3.3 of the Dev. reference the GR calls for votes
should've been sent to the debian-devel-announce, but in reality they weren't.
It seems that the only way to get those would be to subscribe to debian-vote
or to trawl the debian-vote archives. Why is it so?
Regards,
Alex.
Quoting Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> After having this discussed here, I am now inclined to allow @ in user
> names if --force-badname was given or NAME_REGEX was configured
> appropriately.
>
> I'll make that change thursday evening unless some new arguments were
> shown here.
>
I've jus
On 10/09/06 08:38:46AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Jim Crilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Intel's daemon isn't as bad as the Atheros HAL or nVidia's blob
>
> Could you please elaborat on that? why is ath_hal.ko or nvidia.ko worse
> than intel's daemon?
>
> The only real difference is
Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have started working with transitioning a network to LDAP. I am still
> experimenting with this at home before implementing it "for real." This
> brings me to my concern. It appears that many groups are added to the
> system "willy-nilly." By th
I have started working with transitioning a network to LDAP. I am still
experimenting with this at home before implementing it "for real." This
brings me to my concern. It appears that many groups are added to the
system "willy-nilly." By that I mean, I have one system where part of
the /etc/gr
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Bill Allombert wrote:
W: gnumed-client-debug: menu-command-not-in-package
/usr/share/menu/gnumed-client-debug:5 x-terminal-emulator
Shouldn't a
Depends: xterm | x-terminal-emulator
be enough here? I admit that it might be hard to define a lintian rule
to verify the c
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 01:33:03PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> The solution that was suggested by you and Philipp Benner seems to be not
> aware to lintian
>
> W: gnumed-client-debug: menu-command-not-in-package
> /usr/share/menu/gnumed-client-debug:5 x-terminal-emulator
>
> Shouldn't a
>
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vincent Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: qt4-qtruby
Version : 1.4.6
Upstream Author : Richard Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://rubyforge.org/projects/korundum/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++, Ru
Hi,
The call for votes sent our recently had a URL for the full
text that we missing a path segment -- namely, the year. So, the
correct URL's would be:
http://vote.debian.org/2006/vote_005
http://vote.debian.org/2006/vote_006
http://vote.debian.org/2006/vote_007
A visit to h
How are you,
Would you like to make 1.5K to 3.5K a day just for returning phone calls?
If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified.
Get in contact with us : 800-845-0218
Respects,
Bryan Milton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 10:53:39PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > No wrappers for the single most critical binary in a Unix system after the
> > libc. Sorry.
>
> Right. How about upstart not providing a /sbin/init binary at all, but
> inst
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
>> I suggest a simpler route (untested):
>>
>> command="x-terminal-emulator -e /bin/sh -c \"gnumed;echo press any key to
>> continue;read foo\""
>>
>> Note that it does not really solve the dependency on xterm
unsubscribe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is Masayuki Hatta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA?
I have sent him an email like one week ago and he does not reply to:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=377933
Prueba el correo Terra ( http://www.terra.es/correo ); Seguro, rápido, fiable.
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Bill Allombert wrote:
I suggest a simpler route (untested):
command="x-terminal-emulator -e /bin/sh -c \"gnumed;echo press any key to continue;read
foo\""
Note that it does not really solve the dependency on xterm: it merely
replaces it on a depdendency on any terminal-em
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006 00:45:08 +0100, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I'm not sure any of the suspicions have any bearing on question #2,
>however: should adduser be allowed to add usernames of this format, when
>told to with suitable --force flags?
After having this discussed here, I am now
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 01:44:00AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> We don't really need the ability to install *multiple* init systems in
> parallel imho
Yes we do, for the same reason we allow multiple kernel images to be
installed simultaneously: if the new one does not work, there should be
a wa
On Monday 09 October 2006 11:32, Marc Haber took the opportunity to say:
> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:23:48 +0200, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> >On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 09:08 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> >The ultimate solution would be it dpkg-reconfigure magically knew that
> >> > when
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:23:48 +0200, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 09:08 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>> >The ultimate solution would be it dpkg-reconfigure magically knew that when
>> >configuring exim4, it must actually configure exim4-config.
>
>funny, i'd have said t
On la, 2006-10-07 at 18:55 -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 49a98df6-2bd4-40c8-a559-7e15212dbd26
> [ 2 ] Choice 1: Recall the project leader
> [ 1 ] Choice 2: Further discussion
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anyth
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 10:53:39PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> No wrappers for the single most critical binary in a Unix system after the
> libc. Sorry.
Right. How about upstart not providing a /sbin/init binary at all, but
instead using an "init=/sbin/upstart" boot parameter? Th
On Monday, October 09, 2006 6:42 AM, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Aurélien GÉRÔME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> As soon as I send a mail, the deamon restarts... Good news! ;)
>
> Yep. Thanks magic elves!
I've never really pictured aj as an elf... ;-)
Adam
--
To UNSUBSC
Hello,
Would you like to make at least 1.5K to 3.5K a day just for returning phone
calls?
If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified.
Talk with us - 800-513-3876
Respects,
Salvatore Davison
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
hey marc,
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 09:08 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> >The ultimate solution would be it dpkg-reconfigure magically knew that when
> >configuring exim4, it must actually configure exim4-config.
funny, i'd have said the ultimate solution was finding a way to make the
users learn about
#include
* Debian Project Secretary [Sat, Oct 07 2006, 06:53:35PM]:
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> a65763d3-b1e2-4530-8ff8-aa5915274eb4
> [ 2 ] Choice 1: Re-affirm DPL, wish success to unofficial Dunc Tank
> [ 1 ] Choice 2: Re-affirm DPL, do not en
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006 23:22:05 +0200, Hendrik Sattler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Am Sonntag 08 Oktober 2006 22:58 schrieb James Westby:
>> The default level when doing dpkg-reconfigure is low, so that it wont be
>> seen on installation, but if the user tries to reconfigure exim4 they
>> will be direc
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006 22:47:44 +0200, Hendrik Sattler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>/usr/share/doc/exim4/README.Debian.gz:
That is one of the most ignored files on any Debian system.
Users are so incredibly stupid!
Did you miss that exim4 is my package, and that you are pointing me
towards documentat
45 matches
Mail list logo
