Re: debian-private and Gmail

On Wednesday 06 December 2006 08:08, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > What I am wanting is to redirect all my @debian.org emails to my Gmail > account (the field "email forwarded to") and to read debian-private > emails on a Debian machine. > > Is it easy to do this (using procmail maybe)? Yes, you

Re: debian-private and Gmail

On 12/6/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 06 December 2006 03:32, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > > I saw that it's possible to redirect my @debian.org email to an > > address and also redirect debian-private to another email. @debian.org > > is set to @gmail.com. Good. But wha

Bug#401815: ITP: yui -- Yahoo! User Interface Library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: yui Version : 0.12.0 Upstream Author : Yahoo! Developers! * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/yui/ * License : BSD Description

Re: debian-private and Gmail

On Wednesday 06 December 2006 03:32, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > I saw that it's possible to redirect my @debian.org email to an > address and also redirect debian-private to another email. @debian.org > is set to @gmail.com. Good. But what do I do with debian-private? > Is it possible to redire

Re: KDE and Gnome panel applets showing percentage of broken packages

On Wednesday 06 December 2006 03:18, Anthony Towns wrote: > That's true to a point -- but the weather analogy could still work, > in that the "rainy" areas shouldn't move around the archive, not get > stuck anywhere. It'd probably be interesting to get a general idea of > any spots that have a clim

debian-private and Gmail

Hi! People discussed at this thread http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/05/msg02531.html that it's not nice to redirect debian-private to a Gmail account. Well, the problem is that my main email is from Gmail. I have other 2 emails too. One is temporary (from where I study) and I redirect

Re: KDE and Gnome panel applets showing percentage of broken packages

On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 10:44:25PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 05 December 2006 22:25, Berke Durak wrote: > > I will just say that in my opinion, a repository such as stable, > > testing or unstable should be self-contained. > For stable and testing that is true. However, sid is broken by

Re: KDE and Gnome panel applets showing percentage of broken packages

"Frans Pop" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tuesday 05 December 2006 22:25, Berke Durak wrote: I will just say that in my opinion, a repository such as stable, testing or unstable should be self-contained. For stable and testing that is true. However, sid is broken by design as it

Re: BTS: Why no "invalid" or "notabug" tag?

On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 12:43:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Roberto C Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > You mean so that different people can file the same bug over and over > > again? Personally, I'd like to see a notabug tag so that you can have a > > bug still appear on the BTS pag

Re: Why not scan for unmaintained packages and orphan them?

Le Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 01:35:25PM +, Sune Vuorela a écrit : > On 2006-12-05, Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't see "seen" as a supported tag in the BTS documentation, and > > 'confirmed' maybe? > > - but having 20 importaint bugs in one package and 1 wishlist in >

Bug#401800: ITP: ecryptfs-utils -- Linux eCryptfs utilities

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Halcrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: ecryptfs-utils Version : 5 Upstream Author : Michael Halcrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://ecryptfs.sf.net * License : GPL Description : Linux eCryptfs utilit

Re: KDE and Gnome panel applets showing percentage of broken packages

> > (even if following unstable is pretty easy now). > > Maybe you could elaborate on this point, are there new tools that we > aren't aware of ? No. I'm just meaning that, from my POV, unstable is not very often broken...:-) signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Why not scan for unmaintained packages and orphan them?

On Tue, 05 Dec 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > I don't see "seen" as a supported tag in the BTS documentation, and > using a usertag for that won't do, as people (the reporter, the > ax-wielding BTS crawler, ...) won't see it. If you want the BTS crawler or the reporter to see it, use the [EMAIL

Re: KDE and Gnome panel applets showing percentage of broken packages

On Tuesday 05 December 2006 22:25, Berke Durak wrote: > I will just say that in my opinion, a repository such as stable, > testing or unstable should be self-contained. For stable and testing that is true. However, sid is broken by design as it will always receive new versions of packages first a

Re: KDE and Gnome panel applets showing percentage of broken packages

On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 08:18:56PM +, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 04:25:23PM +0100, Berke Durak wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We are collecting Debian metadata daily and running installability > > checks. For instance, today, 1.3% of the packages in unstable/i386 are > > broke

Bug#401779: Subject: ITP: tangerine -- publish music over the local network using DAAP

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: tangerine Version : 0.3.0 Upstream Author : James Willcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.snorp.net/log/tangerine * License : GPL Description : publish music over the local network using DAAP Tange

Re: KDE and Gnome panel applets showing percentage of broken packages

On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 04:25:23PM +0100, Berke Durak wrote: > Hello, > > We are collecting Debian metadata daily and running installability > checks. For instance, today, 1.3% of the packages in unstable/i386 are > broken. The worst in the past 3 months has been on September 10th and > 11th wit

Re: [edos-wp2] KDE and Gnome panel applets showing percentage of broken packages

Oh, one last thing, I forgot the HTML embedding code. If you want to include the Debian weather in your application, you can do this : iframe { border-style: none; width: 140px; height: 500px } div.weather { float: right; width: 100px; height: 200px; margin-right: 30px } http://

Bug#401763: ITP: libwiki-toolkit-plugin-ping-perl -- "ping" various services when nodes are written

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libwiki-toolkit-plugin-ping-perl Version : 0.01 Upstream Author : Wiki::Toolkit team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.wiki-toolkit.org/ * License : Dual GPL/Arti

Bug#401759: ITP: ktranslator -- translate words from one language to another

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: ktranslator Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : Raul Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://ktranslator.sf.net * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Descrip

Re: Bug#401157: ITP: ingres -- Ingres 2006 Business Open Source Database

On Friday 01 December 2006 11:10, Paul J Stevens wrote: > The Ingres 2006 DBMS can support a wide range of applications, from > ad hoc queries to large-scale, mission-critical production applications > which require 24-hour-a-day, 7-day-a-week service. The Ingres 2006 > Intelligent DBMS features

Re: KDE and Gnome panel applets showing percentage of broken packages

On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:40:00PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Is there a reason for this package (and others) not being in Debian > itself? Hello, One simple reason is that the applets are fairly new. As for the backend (e.g., anla and the other tools), we are currently finalizing them a

Re: Why not scan for unmaintained packages and orphan them?

Matthias Julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> - but having 20 importaint bugs in one package and 1 wishlist in >>another package -- in my world the 20 importaint bugs gets higher >>priority - even if it takes a half year to get to the wishlist >

Re: KDE and Gnome panel applets showing percentage of broken packages

> b) Install our KDE panel applet ``kroll'' (written by Jaap Boender) > or our Gnome applet ``weather'' (written by Fabio Mancinelli). > Debian packages for i386 are available at: > > http://alioth.debian.org/frs/?group_id=31055 > > You can also checkout their sources using SVN with >

Re: Why not scan for unmaintained packages and orphan them?

Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - but having 20 importaint bugs in one package and 1 wishlist in >another package -- in my world the 20 importaint bugs gets higher >priority - even if it takes a half year to get to the wishlist >without much commenting. I don't think much

Building m68k packages on aranym

Hello Debian developers, Since October I have experimented with building m68k packages under aranym. This resulted is some issues reported to the Aranym developers, which are now fixed in aranym 0.9.4beta2-1 in sid. This version has proven quite reliable, since I have been able to build large pac

KDE and Gnome panel applets showing percentage of broken packages

Hello, As some of you may know, the EDOS project (http://www.edos-project.org/), funded by the European Community, is developing algorithms and tools to enhance the infrastructure of free and open source software. We are collecting Debian metadata daily and running installability checks. For ins

Re: dictd: no activity last 12 months

On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote: My packaging skills are too poor. ... In my case, www.nomen.at has 133 languages at the moment, and I need some minor multibyte/UTF-8 improvements of the last upstream versions. At least I will have to compile it myself after waiting another few

Bug#401708: ITP: libsys-syscall-perl -- Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libsys-syscall-perl Version : 0.22 Upstream Author : Brad Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~bradfitz/Sys-Syscall-0.22/ * License

Bug#148993: ordnance delegates Geneva

19544 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mass closing of bugs ?

On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 11:46:37AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > Hi, > > Now that iceape replaces mozilla and provides mozilla packages for > transition, the BTS now show all old mozilla bugs in the iceape reports. > These may or may not include bugs that don't exist anymore, and > considering how m

Re: dictd: no activity last 12 months

Andreas Tille wrote: Hijacking the package? My packaging skills are too poor. I have to admit that dict support is kind of weak inside Debian. But for dict_d_ it's worse. There seemed to be no interest in dict-wn wn is a nice thing and IMHO underestimated. But in the case of wn I my

Bug#401699: ITA: xcircuit -- draw circuit schematics or almost anything

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: xcircuit Version : 3.6.63 Upstream Author : R. Timothy Edwards * URL : http://opencircuitdesign.com/xcircuit/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description

Re: Why not scan for unmaintained packages and orphan them?

On 2006-12-05, Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't see "seen" as a supported tag in the BTS documentation, and 'confirmed' maybe? - but having 20 importaint bugs in one package and 1 wishlist in another package -- in my world the 20 importaint bugs gets higher priority

Re: Why not scan for unmaintained packages and orphan them?

On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:19:33AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include > * Marc Haber [Mon, Dec 04 2006, 08:51:51AM]: >> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:05:21 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) wrote: >>>On Nov 30, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But what about the middle case, i.e.

Re: dictd: no activity last 12 months

On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote: What are the usual possibilities to solve this problem? Hijacking the package? I have to admit that dict support is kind of weak inside Debian. I decided to drop the dict-wn package for reasons I explained in http://lists.debian.org/debian

Bug#400070: gaia resurrection

reopen 400070 thanks Gaia has risen from the ashes with free NASA Worldwind imagery: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gaia-clean Gürkan already built new packages for a first impression, available at http://gnu.ethz.ch/debian/gaia/ It's much slower and the images are not as detailed as before un

Bug#401678: ITP: nagios-snmp-plugins -- SNMP Plugins for nagios

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: nagios-snmp-plugins Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Henning P. Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : * License : GPL Pr

dictd: no activity last 12 months

[Sorry, I don't know, if this is the best list for this problem.] On http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dictd.html there is no activity since 2005-12-20 (~12 months). Latest version in testing/unstable is 1.10.2-3 but at upstream is 1.10.7 (with a lot of important improvements and bugfixes). I a