On Thu, Jan 25, 2007, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Evil. Don't change control at build time.
Well, all GNOME packages update their control in the clean target, and
I think this is ok. The GStreamer packages update their packages in
a special "maint" target which is manual; this works okish, b
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 361 (new: 24)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 87 (new: 6)
Total number of packages request
WwW.EgYPoP.CoM Is now Online!
Please Register In EgYPoP.CoM ...It Will not take 5
mins..:::Thanks:::..
Register Link : http://www.egypop.CoM/forum/index.php?
act=Reg&CODE=00
1-Download Amr Diab - Khaleeek Ma3ayaa , Hossam Habib , Fadl Shaker
, Melissa , Ramy Ayach And Etc.
2-We L
Am 2007-01-18 01:28:34, schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:15:50 +0100, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> > This peoples will ask you for help and send all the logfiles maybe
> > in arabic, hindu or africaan.
>
> Hindu is an adjective that describes someone w
>Summary
>===
>
> I've done some work in dak to improve the binary upload restrictions
> that are currently in place to hopefully reduce some of the
> collateral damage that resulted from the initial implementation.
> Binary uploa
On Thursday, 25 January 2007 21:26, Florian Ragwitz wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: blobby
> Version : 0.6a
> Upstream Author : Jonathan Sieber and others
> * URL : http://blobby.redio.de/conten
El jue, 25-01-2007 a las 01:23 +, James Troup escribió:
[...]
>
>Why restrictions on binary uploads?
>===
>
> So there are several reasons why these restrictions have been put in
> place:
>
> (o) reproducibility
>
[...]
>
> (o
Hi Øystein,
Øystein Gisnås wrote:
> Is there a good way to let Maemo-specific packaging files coexist with
> Debian unstable files in the upstream tree? Currently there is a
> debian/ upstream, but it is Debian unstable specific. Btw tinymail is
> not part of the official Debian Archive.
I think t
Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is it technically and/or socially possible to send build logs to
>> buildd.debian.org?
>
> Yes, the current security model does not prohibit that.
When amd64 tried doing that the logs got filtered out.
Has the filtering of uploads from unofficial buildd
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: blobby
Version : 0.6a
Upstream Author : Jonathan Sieber and others
* URL : http://blobby.redio.de/content/de/index.php
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, C++, Lua
D
James Troup dijo [Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:23:35AM +]:
> [heavy-SNIP]
>
> (a) we don't currently have the buildd infrastructure for this - it
> would require a minimum of 2 (preferably 3) machines dedicated to
> being i386 buildds. It would also make i386 uploads much more
> sen
>> Is it technically and/or socially possible to send build logs to
>> buildd.debian.org?
> Yes, the current security model does not prohibit that.
And how do we send the build logs, please?
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
Buenos Dias,
Somos una central de ventas basada en CÔTE DIVOIRE , buscando por internet
hemos conocido su empresa ,adonde sacamos vuestro contacto.
Nuestro interese en contactarles,es ver de que forma podemos comprar vuestros
productos ,y satisfacer mejor las necesidades de nuestro mercado.
P
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2007, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
>> Is there a good way to let Maemo-specific packaging files coexist with
>> Debian unstable files in the upstream tree? Currently there is a
>> debian/ upstream, but it is Debian unstable specific. Btw tinymail
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Summary
> ===
>
> I've done some work in dak to improve the binary upload restrictions
> that are currently in place to hopefully reduce some of the collateral
> damage that resulted fro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Erik Vetters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libxml-rss-feed-perl
Version : 2.212
Upstream Author : Jeff Bisbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~jbisbee/XML-RSS-Feed-2.212/
* License : Perl (Artisti
> Is it technically and/or socially possible to send build logs to
> buildd.debian.org?
Yes, the current security model does not prohibit that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tital: Leather Clothing
url; http://www.leather-clothing-online.com/
Desc: Offers leather Clothings for mans and women at heavy discounted rates.
Title: Leather Laptop Bags
URL: http://www.leather-bags-online.com/leather-laptop-bags.html
Desc: Offers leather bags for mans and ladies at heavy di
Dear user of lists.debian.org, Mail server administrator of lists.debian.org
would like to let you know the following:
Your e-mail account was used to send a large amount of spam messages during
this week.
Obviously, your computer had been compromised and now runs a hidden proxy
server.
We rec
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 03:44:39AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> However, as I can be drummed out of Debian for not fulfilling my quota of
> complaining, may I ask why this was sent to debian-devel and not
> debian-devel-announce? :-)
Because it really just is an implementation detail of our
b
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, James Troup wrote:
Summary
===
Credit where credit is due. This is exactly the kind of informative
explanation I have been looking for and I hope we'll see a lot of more of
this sort of thing from the in
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
> Is there a good way to let Maemo-specific packaging files coexist with
> Debian unstable files in the upstream tree? Currently there is a
> debian/ upstream, but it is Debian unstable specific. Btw tinymail is
> not part of the official Debian Archive.
Le jeudi 25 janvier 2007 à 01:23 +, James Troup a écrit :
> The idea of emulated buildds or cross compiling has been around for a
> long time. Personally I don't think it's a good idea, but that's not
> really the point. The point is that one person should not
> unilaterally make the decision
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I would assume 10 days is enough to "automatically" build all that
> is in experimental...
Some packages can not be autobuilt due to complex dependencies across
unstable and experimental. AFAIK, sbuild is not designed to work from
multiple APT sources
James Troup a écrit :
> Why are the current set of restrictions in place?
> =
>
> arm has had restrictions in place ever since Aurelien decided to
> unilaterally turn on emulated buildd(s) for arm with no consensus from
> the arm port
25 matches
Mail list logo
