On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Debian release team wrote:
That was the good news. Unfortunately, there is also the bad side:
due to several grave security problems in some of the core packages,
we cannot release "etch" as originally planned[0] on 2 Apr 2007. By
rough calculation, we are looking at another
On Friday 30 March 2007 08.47:53 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > OK, so please take this honest.
>
> I don't think I have ever been dishonest about it. Amused,
> perhaps, dishonest, no.
Language issue. s/honest/serious/
Admittedly, I'm guessing.
cheers
-- vbi
--
The young lady had an
On Thursday 29 March 2007 06.24:52 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:52:33 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > You do not handle signing subkeys?
> >
> > What makes you think th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: stereo
Version : 2.0 beta
* URL : http://www.mono-project.com/Stereo
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C#
Description : Mono (.NET) extension for running multiple a
Package: wnpp
Owner: Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gtkcanvas-muxitex-slur-k
Version : 4.1
Upstream Author : Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : N/A
* License : CDDL
Programming Lang: C#, with Markov Chain support
On Saturday 31 March 2007 10:17, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this is so important, why, after so many many months of freeze, no Xen
> users found this and submited a bug report? (Now its #413601, filed 24 days
> ago)
Probably because it's dependent on the order
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > Indeed it accounts for some part of the problem; after I cloned and
> > replaced my /var/lib/dpkg/info tree with the copy, the figure dropped
> > from 22 seconds to 15 seconds.
> It's not that. It's /var/lib/dpkg/available.
Err, I timed before an
Heya,
>
> Which library?
>
According to the mail headers this mail was a reply to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
google found it in the archive:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/1999/02/msg00565.html
So we're talking about pdflib.
And I think the package php-fpdf should be a way to create pdf files
fro
* Adam Borowski:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 08:57:03PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
>> Indeed it accounts for some part of the problem; after I cloned and
>> replaced my /var/lib/dpkg/info tree with the copy, the figure dropped
>> from 22 seconds to 15 seconds.
>
> It's not that. It's /var/lib/dpk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
> Hello, debian-devel.
>
> Yes, this library needed for generating pdf docs from PHP.
> Could you package it into next version?
>
Hi,
1 - Exists RFP: http://www.us.debian.org/devel/wnpp/requested
2 - We can't guess witho
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 08:57:03PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > Indeed it accounts for some part of the problem; after I cloned and
> > replaced my /var/lib/dpkg/info tree with the copy, the figure dropped
> > from 22 seconds to 15 seconds.
>
> It's
Scribit Magnus Holmgren dies 31/03/2007 hora 14:34:
> Have there been any discussion about adding a field to the Release and/or
> Packages files pointing at e.g. changelogs, so that aptitude etc. could
> display those for packages from unofficial repositories as well?
Maybe it would be worth des
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: perl-doc-html
Version : 5.8.8
Upstream Author : Larry Wall, et. al.
* URL : http://perldoc.perl.org/perldoc-html.tar.gz
* Lice
* Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070331 14:35]:
> Have there been any discussion about adding a field to the Release and/or
> Packages files pointing at e.g. changelogs, so that aptitude etc. could
> display those for packages from unofficial repositories as well? (I presume
> that the locati
Have there been any discussion about adding a field to the Release and/or
Packages files pointing at e.g. changelogs, so that aptitude etc. could
display those for packages from unofficial repositories as well? (I presume
that the location of official changelogs is hardcoded into aptitude
curre
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > What's the advantage over bug-buddy? Can't bug-buddy be extended to
> > implement similar functionality?
> I examined both possibilities and it turned out too complicated without
> re-using the reportbug modules. Hence the choice of python.
>
>
Le samedi 31 mars 2007 à 11:41 +0200, Loïc Minier a écrit :
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Debreaper is meant to be a drop-in replacement for the GNOME signal
> > handler, but can easily be used by any other software. It attempts to
> > remain as simple as bug-buddy, and m
On Mar 31, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm in favor of adding a note in the Release Notes but I think we should not
> delay the release (*again*) by modifying such a critical element as udev
> right now.
I think the fix would be harmless, but it's too late anyway.
18 matches
Mail list logo
