On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:02:27AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > Is it interesting for the user/sysadm that the frontend is developed in
> > Python? I would remote that (while I will keep the reference to GTK) and
> > perhaps adding something about the intended targets: both advanced users
> >
Hi
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:49:47 +0200
Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anybody know how to tell CMake not to use /usr/lib64 but /usr/lib
> when building a package on amd64?
There are needed some special steps? I recently switched Gammu package
to CMake and it automatically insta
Le mercredi 11 avril 2007 à 23:20 +0100, Luis Matos a écrit :
> Tasksel has no devel task.
>
> There are no development environments for example: C/gtk, C#/GTK,
> Java/Gtk, python/gtk pre-defined.
apt-get install gnome-devel
--
.''`.
: :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 06:23:32PM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
> Qua, 2007-04-11 às 17:33 +0200, Robert Millan escreveu:
> > > I don't know what the critical mass of Linux users is that generates
> > > interest for Linux among software vendors. We seem to be far from
> > > it.
> >
> > Yes, but Mic
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:55:36PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:13:07PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
> > I don't think it needs win64-only games.
>
> Please remember that this is debian-devel and not some general
> discussion list.
This thread has been moved from debi
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:13:07PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
>
> I don't think it needs win64-only games. It just needs games that run
> with a 10% higher frame rate on win64 to create demand. Or on
> Linux-amd64.
Not even that. The hype factor is enough to create demand, but this kind of
d
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:12:00PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Do we have plans for lenny to enable the use of bzip2 instead of gzip
> for the upstream orig.tar source tarballs? Does dpkg/apt support this
> already or has this already been thought about?
>
> This would reduce our archive size by
According to the benchmarks in http://www.linuks.mine.nu/sizematters/ , the
size of the archive would be nearly 30% smaller, but the decompression would
be 5 times slower, meaning that it would take 500% the time it takes now to
uncompress the archives. Compression time would be 10 times more (100
On to, 2007-04-12 at 10:12 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:12:00PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > This would reduce our archive size by some 20% if all packages moved to
> > bzip2.
>
> Why not lzma? It reduces size even more and doesn't suffer from the "all our
> code bel
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:57:09AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I don't think "beginner" and "developer" belong in the same sentence.
Yes they do. I met people who develop commercial software but who are
completely ignorant about any system administration tasks. They're not
the people who use co
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> i don't mean all the debug and etc stuff... But the a beginner
>> environment for people to start to use and learn about linux
>> development.
>
> I don't think "beginner" and "developer" belong in the same sentence.
At least for debian, this seems to
Looking at the submission numbers from
http://popcon.debian.org/>, I am happy to report that the number
of Etch installations is increasing fast. Here are the number of
submissions collected by popularity-contest, with the increment. It
is easy to see when Etch was released.
date submiss
Petter Reinholdtsen schrieb:
Looking at the submission numbers from
http://popcon.debian.org/>, I am happy to report that the number
of Etch installations is increasing fast. Here are the number of
submissions collected by popularity-contest, with the increment. It
is easy to see when Etch was
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Looking at the submission numbers from
> http://popcon.debian.org/>, I am happy to report that the number
> of Etch installations is increasing fast. Here are the number of
> submissions collected by popularity-contest, with the increment. It
> is easy to see when Etc
* 2007-04-12 11:29, Joey Hess wrote:
> I wonder if it would be reasonable to make d-i hit one of two urls
> depending on whether the user chose to enable popcon, and count the
> results.
Isn't this a violation of user's privacy? If the user hitted `No', this
really means that he doesn't want to ca
Hello
As I had much too few time for testing and improving the MySQL packages during
the last month and will be away for the whole May, I need some Co-Maintainer.
Preferably someone who is motivated enough to maybe somewhen take over the whole
package as I'm getting a bit bored on it after 8 year
Hi,
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> * 2007-04-12 11:29, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I wonder if it would be reasonable to make d-i hit one of two urls
> > depending on whether the user chose to enable popcon, and count the
> > results.
>
> Isn't this a violation of user's privacy? If th
* 2007-04-12 12:09, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> As long as we don't use that to collect sensitive information, it would be
> ok IMO. (Of course, a preseed question could avoid it completely too)
I think Google Earth for Linux does the same, and IIRC the general
agreement in the free software communit
Hi Enrico,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 11:01:10PM +0200, Cherubini Enrico wrote:
> Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 04:49:21PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>
>> Hmm, I was under the impression that before 2.0, debian wasn't released
>> as binaries yet, only source packages and the source code to the
>> utilitie
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> > * 2007-04-12 11:29, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > I wonder if it would be reasonable to make d-i hit one of two urls
> > > depending on whether the user chose to enable popcon, and count
> the
> > > results.
> >
> > Isn't
Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * 2007-04-12 11:29, Joey Hess wrote:
>> I wonder if it would be reasonable to make d-i hit one of two urls
>> depending on whether the user chose to enable popcon, and count the
>> results.
>
> Isn't this a violation of user's privacy? If the user h
On to, 2007-04-12 at 12:16 +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> * 2007-04-12 12:09, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > As long as we don't use that to collect sensitive information, it would be
> > ok IMO. (Of course, a preseed question could avoid it completely too)
>
> I think Google Earth for Linux does
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 05:29 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I wonder if it would be reasonable to make d-i hit one of two urls
> depending on whether the user chose to enable popcon, and count the
> results.
Since there are some potential drawbacks to this functionality, what
concrete gain would the pro
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:39:32 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > I may be wrong, I don't know, but in my opinion a ping to call back home
> > even if the user said `No' is a evil behaviour and Debian should avoid it.
> I agree. If the user says "no", we should do nothing.
Full ack.
> [ ] N
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 01:13:55PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 05:29 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I wonder if it would be reasonable to make d-i hit one of two urls
> > depending on whether the user chose to enable popcon, and count the
> > results.
>
> Since there are som
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xmds-doc
Version : 0~svn.1321
Upstream Author : P.T. Cochrane, G. Collecutt, P.D. Drummond, and J.J. Hope
* URL : http://xmds.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Progra
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
I may be wrong, I don't know, but in my opinion a ping to call back home
even if the user said `No' is a evil behaviour and Debian should avoid it.
I agree. If the user says "no", we should do nothing.
Indeed, I also think that "No" here means "I don't want to send any k
[Sebastian Mach]
> Is that only for stable? Me for example uses a february testing, and
> I might not be alone
These numbers are for everyone, including oldstable, stable, testing
and unstable.
Friendly,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
[Lars Wirzenius]
> However, changing the popcon debconf question to something like the
> following might be an acceptable compromise:
>
> Would you like to participate in the Debian package popularity
> contest meter? Blah blah blah. You may also choose to only
> report onc
Qui, 2007-04-12 às 09:53 +0200, Josselin Mouette escreveu:
> Le mercredi 11 avril 2007 à 23:20 +0100, Luis Matos a écrit :
> > Tasksel has no devel task.
> >
> > There are no development environments for example: C/gtk, C#/GTK,
> > Java/Gtk, python/gtk pre-defined.
>
> apt-get install gnome-devel
Qui, 2007-04-12 às 11:03 +0200, Reinhard Tartler escreveu:
> Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> i don't mean all the debug and etc stuff... But the a beginner
> >> environment for people to start to use and learn about linux
> >> development.
> >
> > I don't think "beginner" and "dev
Qui, 2007-04-12 às 10:58 +0200, Gabor Gombas escreveu:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:57:09AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > I don't think "beginner" and "developer" belong in the same sentence.
>
> Yes they do. I met people who develop commercial software but who are
> completely ignorant about
2007/4/12, Luis Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Qui, 2007-04-12 às 09:53 +0200, Josselin Mouette escreveu:
> Le mercredi 11 avril 2007 à 23:20 +0100, Luis Matos a écrit :
> > Tasksel has no devel task.
> >
> > There are no development environments for example: C/gtk, C#/GTK,
> > Java/Gtk, python/gtk
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Actually, I've considered adding hardware reporting to popcon, using a
> separate question (or more options, not sure which), and hardware
> reports do not need to be sent as often as package usage. Such
> report-once setting should report the outp
Le jeudi 12 avril 2007 à 14:25 +0100, Luis Matos a écrit :
> gnome-devel has what? anjuta, devhelp, glade and ...
... and gnome-core-devel.
> i see for example
> that it has no -dev dependency ... so ... how are people going to
> compile stuff against gnome/gtk/linux libraries? They are only
> r
Qui, 2007-04-12 às 09:37 -0300, André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira escreveu:
>
> 2007/4/12, Luis Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Qui, 2007-04-12 às 09:53 +0200, Josselin Mouette escreveu:
> > Le mercredi 11 avril 2007 à 23:20 +0100, Luis Matos a
> écrit :
> > > Tasksel has
Qui, 2007-04-12 às 14:39 +0200, Josselin Mouette escreveu:
> Le jeudi 12 avril 2007 à 14:25 +0100, Luis Matos a écrit :
> > gnome-devel has what? anjuta, devhelp, glade and ...
>
> ... and gnome-core-devel.
you killed me ... true, it has the -dev packages.
do you agree with the previous post ab
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Sebastian Mach]
>> Is that only for stable? Me for example uses a february testing, and
>> I might not be alone
>
> These numbers are for everyone, including oldstable, stable, testing
> and unstable.
And what is most interesting about them i
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> However, changing the popcon debconf question to something like the
> following might be an acceptable compromise:
>
> Would you like to participate in the Debian package popularity
> contest meter? Blah blah blah. You may also choose to only
> repor
I was wondering, as I did not find any clear info on the subject by
Googling: is Debian the only distro that renamed the Mozilla packages?
If not, which ones?
Curiously,
Pierre
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Henrique de Moraes Holschuh]
> dmidecode output is a big problem. It includes machine UUID and serial
> numbers.
Yes.
Perhaps we only want to collect a subset of that information, or at
least warn the admin about the issues.
I believe The ubuntu hardware database collect that kind of
informati
Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> If not, which ones?
+ http://www.gnewsense.org/ ?
--
Chris Lamb, Cambridgeshire, UK GPG: 0x634F9A20
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On April 12, 2007 11:34:00 am Chris Lamb wrote:
> Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> > If not, which ones?
>
> + http://www.gnewsense.org/ ?
Gentoo has done renames of Mozilla products such as Firefox too.
- Lawrence
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Hi,
On Thursday 12 April 2007 11:03, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Since this inquiry is valid however, it seems to me that it would make
> sense the think about some CDD specialised for developers.
I recently heard about this "Debian sid" thingy, maybe you give it a try?
Seriously, I dont understan
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:22:37 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > dmidecode output is a big problem. It includes machine UUID and serial
> > numbers.
> Yes.
> Perhaps we only want to collect a subset of that information, or at
> least warn the admin about the issues.
I'd suggest to show the per
On 2007-04-12, Lawrence Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On April 12, 2007 11:34:00 am Chris Lamb wrote:
>> Pierre THIERRY wrote:
>> > If not, which ones?
>>
>> + http://www.gnewsense.org/ ?
>
> Gentoo has done renames of Mozilla products such as Firefox too.
I asked one of my local gentoo d
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:02:56 +0200
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The reference to GTK is useless, too.
> > We have tags for that sort of things.
>
> I disagree. Tags can express a lot more of information of what does fit
> a *short* description. One has to make a choice about w
I demand that Miriam Ruiz may or may not have written...
[snip]
> Compression time would be 10 times more (1000% the time it takes now).
No; either that's 1100%, or you mean 10 times as much.
[snip]
--
| Darren Salt| linux or ds at | nr. Ashington, | Toon
| RISC OS, Linux | you
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:28:50 +0100
Luis Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since this inquiry is valid however, it seems to me that it would make
> > sense the think about some CDD specialised for developers.
>
> This would be very nice ... maybe some livecd's? ( it does not need
> necessarilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
debian-devel-digest Digest Volume 2007 : Issue 198
Today's Topics:
Draft spec for new dpkg "triggers" f [ Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
Some fairly usel
On April 12, 2007 01:10:53 pm Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2007-04-12, Lawrence Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On April 12, 2007 11:34:00 am Chris Lamb wrote:
> >> Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> >> > If not, which ones?
> >>
> >> + http://www.gnewsense.org/ ?
> >
> > Gentoo has done renames of Mozil
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Drew Parsons wrote:
>> Do we have plans for lenny to enable the use of bzip2 instead of gzip
>> for the upstream orig.tar source tarballs? Does dpkg/apt support this
>> already or has this already been thought about?
[...]
> A more co
Scribit Andrea Bolognani dies 12/04/2007 hora 18:01:
> I think a live CD aimed at developers would be quite useless. But
> feel free to correct me.
The Université Jussieu (Paris) found it useful. They distribute a live
CD based on Knoppix to the students, called Juppix:
http://www.pps.jussieu.fr
On 4/12/07, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looking at the submission numbers from
http://popcon.debian.org/>, I am happy to report that the number
of Etch installations is increasing fast. Here are the number of
submissions collected by popularity-contest, with the increment. I
On 4/12/07, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007-04-12, Lawrence Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gentoo has done renames of Mozilla products such as Firefox too.
I asked one of my local gentoo devs - and he says "no - it is not
rebranded/renamed"
It's a USE flag called "mozbran
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 11:01:10PM +0200, Cherubini Enrico wrote:
> I have the 1995 InfoMagic 5 cd set, and it contains Debian 1.0 with .deb
> packages and of course install floppy images :)
>
> Maybe I'll try it in some qemu/xen virtual system :)
>
> home:/cdrom/debian/debian-1.0# du -s binary/
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 08:10:43AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> No, binaries were provided for all official releases (buzz/1.1 onwards).
> There was an installer (known as boot-floppies); its appearance was
> fairly similar from buzz right through to woody when it was retired.
>
> There was no a
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 10:12 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:12:00PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Do we have plans for lenny to enable the use of bzip2 instead of gzip
> > for the upstream orig.tar source tarballs? Does dpkg/apt support this
> > already or has this alread
On 4/12/07, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This thread has been moved from debian-release already.
That's because debian-release is not a discussion list, it's only for
coordination of the release.
We're discussing a question that could affect decisions on the lenny release
schedul
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:18:27 +0200
Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think a live CD aimed at developers would be quite useless. But
> > feel free to correct me.
>
> The Université Jussieu (Paris) found it useful. They distribute a live
> CD based on Knoppix to the students, called
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 20:25:35 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> Still I don't see the advantage of having a complete development
> environment on a live CD. Who is supposed to use this?
>
Students, who typically only have a windows install at home. It's much
easier (for them and for the teache
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 11:31 +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> * 2007-04-12 11:29, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I wonder if it would be reasonable to make d-i hit one of two urls
> > depending on whether the user chose to enable popcon, and count the
> > results.
>
> Isn't this a violation of user's priva
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 10:39 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> However, changing the popcon debconf question to something like the
> following might be an acceptable compromise:
>
> Would you like to participate in the Debian package popularity
> contest meter? Blah blah blah. You may
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:27:25 +0200
Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 20:25:35 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
>
> > Still I don't see the advantage of having a complete development
> > environment on a live CD. Who is supposed to use this?
> >
> Students, who typic
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 17:32 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:22:37 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> > > dmidecode output is a big problem. It includes machine UUID and serial
> > > numbers.
> > Yes.
> > Perhaps we only want to collect a subset of that information, or at
Qui, 2007-04-12 às 20:40 +0200, Andrea Bolognani escreveu:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:27:25 +0200
> Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 20:25:35 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> >
> > > Still I don't see the advantage of having a complete development
> > > environ
Hi. I have recently installed debian etch from scratch, but samba is
crashing.
I have installed the samba-dbg package but i'm not getting a stack trace
in the samba panic-action.
Have i done anything wrong?
I get this e-mail:
The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action,
was c
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 03:16:55PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> >We're discussing a question that could affect decisions on the lenny
> >release schedule.
>
> The release schedule will not be affected by whatever ESR says in his
> essays.
Why does the essay's authorship matter?
> Debian
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:33:46AM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> According to the benchmarks in http://www.linuks.mine.nu/sizematters/ , the
> size of the archive would be nearly 30% smaller, but the decompression would
> be 5 times slower, meaning that it would take 500% the time it takes now to
> u
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:38:56AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Why not lzma? It reduces size even more
>
> It's the same question really. "Do we want to move on from gz?"
>
> I guess bzip2 is more widely known than lzma, that is we're more likely
> to directly use upstream's tarballs by ad
Qui, 2007-04-12 às 21:03 +0200, Robert Millan escreveu:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:38:56AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > Why not lzma? It reduces size even more
> >
> > It's the same question really. "Do we want to move on from gz?"
> >
> > I guess bzip2 is more widely known than lzma, t
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 08:38:34AM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On to, 2007-04-12 at 10:12 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:12:00PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > This would reduce our archive size by some 20% if all packages moved to
> > > bzip2.
> >
> > Why not lzma
Hi Fred,
Frederico Rodrigues Abraham wrote:
> I have recently installed debian etch from scratch, but samba is
> crashing.
thank you for contacting us with your issue. In order to alert the
people that are most likely to be able to help you, it would be best if
you filed a bug report for the samb
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 09:07:57PM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
> Qui, 2007-04-12 às 21:03 +0200, Robert Millan escreveu:
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:38:56AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > > Why not lzma? It reduces size even more
> > >
> > > It's the same question really. "Do we want to move o
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 01:49:19PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Actually, I've considered adding hardware reporting to popcon, using a
> separate question (or more options, not sure which), and hardware
> reports do not need to be sent as often as package usage. Such
> report-once settin
Hi all,
I notice ia64 has ia32-libs and ia32-libs-dev, but I can't seem to find a
compiler to build i386 binaries.
The reason being is that I want to add support for the Debian nspluginwrapper
package to run on ia64 machines, since they are biarch and have ia32-libs
and ia32-libs-gtk.
If there i
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 09:24:38PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 01:49:19PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I've considered adding hardware reporting to popcon, using a
> > separate question (or more options, not sure which), and hardware
> > reports do
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> It's OK, I planned to discuss this after the release.
> Experience showed that generally other packages do not need an easy way
> to disable their whole rules files, so I think we can conclude that
> usage of symlinks can be restricted to some of udev's own files and
> eventua
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> However, changing the popcon debconf question to something like the
> following might be an acceptable compromise:
Farid not, it might result in slightly more installations being
reported, but it will not let us calculate the approximate total number
of new installations, s
[Robert Millan]
> I would be very interested in an i386-only feature to report wether
> the CPU is 64-bit capable (I have code in win32-loader with this
> functionality).
>
> I'm not sure how this would fit in your client/server protocol, but I can
> easily grab the code from win32-loader and inte
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 09:32:33PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > I would be very interested in an i386-only feature to report wether the CPU
> > is 64-bit capable (I have code in win32-loader with this functionality).
> >
> > I'm not sure how this would fit in your client/server protocol, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/12/07 14:32, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
[snip]
>
> You can also see this by looking at /proc/cpuinfo looking for "lm" in
> flags.
Does lahf_lm count?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fis
* Ron Johnson:
> On 04/12/07 14:32, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> You can also see this by looking at /proc/cpuinfo looking for "lm" in
>> flags.
>
> Does lahf_lm count?
The file should also list "lm" earlier on the same line.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 02:27:51PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> >> Gentoo has done renames of Mozilla products such as Firefox too.
> >I asked one of my local gentoo devs - and he says "no - it is not
> >rebranded/renamed"
>
> It's a USE flag called "mozbranding". It lets the user choose w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/12/07 15:14, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Ron Johnson:
>
>> On 04/12/07 14:32, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> You can also see this by looking at /proc/cpuinfo looking for "lm" in
>>> flags.
>> Does lahf_lm count?
>
> The file should also list "
On 04/10/07 10:19:02PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 06:39:16PM -0400, Jim Crilly wrote:
> > And don't forget games. Game developers will start releasing 64-bit binaries
> > and gamers will eat them up just because 64 > 32. So the Win64 market will
> > have a fair amount of
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 05:29:13AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > Looking at the submission numbers from
> > http://popcon.debian.org/>, I am happy to report that the number
> > of Etch installations is increasing fast. Here are the number of
> > submissions collected by
Looks like with current setup, [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not accept
mail from domain that does not exist for the outside world.
This looks suboptimal for me: why not accept all mail that looks like a
popcon report?
I know that it is possible to do local setup such as mail will look more
legitimat
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 07:25:02PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Please keep on sending these interesting stats, perhaps once-per-week,
> to some blog or some mailing list. I'll be real glad. Thanks...
Better yet, set up a MRTG-like graph. Everybody loves fancy graphs and they
are really us
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 12:21:09AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>
> The only caveat I can think of (but there might be others) is that it would
> not be possible to properly count installations that are using
> corporate (or ISP's) caching proxies (in somecases those are transparen
Greetings, Kindly advice of the way to submit for an Arabic linguist position
or cultural adviser within USA. Thanks and regards Michael Ford
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Better yet, set up a MRTG-like graph. Everybody loves fancy graphs and they
> are really useful in presentations at conferences :)
http://popcon.debian.org/stat/sub-i386.png
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 12:12:00 +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Do we have plans for lenny to enable the use of bzip2 instead of gzip
> for the upstream orig.tar source tarballs? Does dpkg/apt support this
> already or has this already been thought about?
As other people have replied etch's dpkg supp
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 21:03 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:38:56AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > Why not lzma? It reduces size even more
> >
> > It's the same question really. "Do we want to move on from gz?"
> >
> > I guess bzip2 is more widely known than lzma, t
yeah, i can report the bug, but there will be no stack trace, although
samba-dbg is supported to supply these?
Greets
-- Fred
On 4/12/07, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Fred,
Frederico Rodrigues Abraham wrote:
> I have recently installed debian etch from scratch, but samba is
>
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 02:21 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> Looks like with current setup, [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not accept
> mail from domain that does not exist for the outside world.
>
> This looks suboptimal for me: why not accept all mail that looks like a
> popcon report?
>
> I kno
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 08:35:50PM +0200, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 17:32 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:22:37 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> >
> > > > dmidecode output is a big problem. It includes machine UUID and serial
> >
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 397 (new: 26)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 82 (new: 2)
Total number of packages request
Hello,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> Looks like with current setup, [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not accept
> mail from domain that does not exist for the outside world.
>
> This looks suboptimal for me: why not accept all mail that looks like a
> popcon report?
This has alread
* Ron Johnson:
> On 04/12/07 15:14, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Ron Johnson:
>>
>>> On 04/12/07 14:32, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>>> [snip]
You can also see this by looking at /proc/cpuinfo looking for "lm" in
flags.
>>> Does lahf_lm count?
>>
>> The file should also list "lm" earlier on the s
100 matches
Mail list logo
