Re: Bug#419951: ITP: jexcelapi -- Java API to read, write and modify Excel spreadsheets

Alle 01:37, giovedì 19 aprile 2007, Torsten Werner ha scritto: > Description : Java API to read, write and modify Excel spreadsheets > The Java Excel API is an open source Java API which allows Java developers > to read Excel spreadsheets and to generate Excel spreadsheets dynamically. (Sor

Re: UNSUSCRIBE

On Tuesday 17 April 2007 20.51:16 Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: > man procmailrc On gmail? -- vbi -- this email is protected by a digital signature: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg pgpjhb3v1ODBT.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#419966: ITP: libclass-std-perl -- Perl module for creating standard "inside-out" classes

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ivan Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libclass-std-perl Version : 0.0.8 Upstream Author : Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-Std/ * License : same as Perl itself Program

Bug#419968: ITP: libconfig-std-perl -- Perl module to load and save configuration files in a standard format

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ivan Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libconfig-std-perl Version : 0.0.4 Upstream Author : Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Config-Std/ * License : same as Perl itself Progr

Re: Using dpkg-statoverride

Rodrigo Tavares wrote: > Hello, > > When I unpacked the package, the files permissions are > with a user than created the package. > > Using dpkg-statoverride, I can to change all files for > another user ? If the package is not one of your own, please immediately file a critical bug against it

Re: Xorg 7.2

On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 08:31:04AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > Just a quick heads-up for those who don't read planet and have been > wondering why Xorg 7.2 is lingering in experimental: There's an excellent > announcement on David Nusinov's blog at >

Bug#419951: ITP: jexcelapi -- Java API to read, write and modify Excel spreadsheets

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: jexcelapi Version : 2.6.3 Upstream Author : Andy Khan * URL : http://www.jexcelapi.org/ * License : LGPL Programming Lang: Java Description : Java API to read, wri

Re: Linux/Debian documentation suggestion

On 18-Apr-07, 15:03 (CDT), Debian Oracle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately, it cannot be told. The discussion involved happened on > debian-private, and its participants have said they don't want it > published. Not even the Debian Oracle is mighty enough to survive the > punishment for r

Re: Linux/Debian documentation suggestion

On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 05:10:20PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: > > > *If I want or need command xxzz, which packages can give me that? > > You'll need to explore the packages website. You mean the search page on packages.debian.org called "Search the contents of packages"? Which just like apt

Re: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Luis Matos wrote: A cdd would be good for some first testing, but having it included in debian would be great. Argh - the usual missunderstanding: If you use the term Custom Debian Distribution your first Google hit gives the definition: Custom Debian Distribution (CDD

Re: Linux/Debian documentation suggestion

On ke, 2007-04-18 at 14:31 -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: > apt-file (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low > > * Initial Release. > > -- Sebastien J. Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 13 Oct 2001 21:36:47 +0200 > > I've been living without this for 5+ years!?! How come no one told me > about t

Re: merging BTS manual and d.o/Bugs documentation?

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Mario Iseli wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 02:26:30AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > I see no real benefit to have both documents, what do you think > > about merging them or just use one? > > I'd say remove the very detailed explanations like the bts tags from > the /Bugs pag

Bug#419924: ITP: glusterfs -- A powerful network/cluster filesystem

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Christian Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Package name: glusterfs Version : 1.2.3 Upstream Author : Amar Tumballi Anand Avati Anand Babu Balamurugan A Basava

Re: Linux/Debian documentation suggestion

On 17-Apr-07, 18:22 (CDT), The Fungi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 05:10:20PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: > > On 17-Apr-07, 13:25 (CDT), Glenn Moeller-Holst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > *If I want or need command xxzz, which packages can give me that? > > > > You'll

Re: Not-so-mass bug filing for the patented IDEA algorithm

Am 2007-04-10 13:51:13, schrieb Neil Williams: > IANAL, but being open source, a patent lawyer would probably try to > claim that distributing the code ALLOWS the infringement of the patent > as if that makes Debian complicit in the infringement. Whether the code > actually does include an implemen

Re: Using dpkg-statoverride

On Wednesday 18 April 2007 16:03, Rodrigo Tavares wrote: > When I unpacked the package, the files permissions are > with a user than created the package. > > Using dpkg-statoverride, I can to change all files for > another user ? What package? All files in a package should be owned by root or poss

Re: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 15:24 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I would like to start a new sub-project called Debian4Business or perhaps > Debian-Office.I have a slight preference for the first name, but this is > discussable of course. Since your are using Debian as a base, have at it. Do you best

Re: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

Hello there ... Qua, 2007-04-18 às 15:24 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: > I would like to start a new sub-project called Debian4Business or perhaps > Debian-Office.I have a slight preference for the first name, but this is > discussable of course. a bit of background. Last week i emailed deb

Using dpkg-statoverride

Hello, When I unpacked the package, the files permissions are with a user than created the package. Using dpkg-statoverride, I can to change all files for another user ? Best regards, Rodrigo Faria __ Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Y

Re: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

Hi, * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-18 15:26]: > I have a small company, that provides legal services. About 6 months ago (I > use > linux for more than 8 years already) all desktops are running Linux now. And you still use DOS linebreaks? SCNR Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde

Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

I would like to start a new sub-project called Debian4Business or perhaps Debian-Office.I have a slight preference for the first name, but this is discussable of course. I have a small company, that provides legal services. About 6 months ago (I use linux for more than 8 years already) all deskto

Re: Package file names

On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 01:47:26PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > Is it a technical requirement (of dpkg, apt, and/or dak), that packages be > named ${pkgname}_${version}_${arch}.${ext} (${pkgname}_${version}.${ext} for > source), or merely (or mostly) policy? It's a technical requirement for a

Bug#419865: ITP: cruisecontrolrb -- A continuous integration tool written in ruby

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: James Healy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: cruisecontrolrb Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : Alexey Verkhovsky , Jeremy Stell-Smith * URL : http://cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com * License : Apache License Version

Package file names

Is it a technical requirement (of dpkg, apt, and/or dak), that packages be named ${pkgname}_${version}_${arch}.${ext} (${pkgname}_${version}.${ext} for source), or merely (or mostly) policy? I note that dpkg-deb and dpkg-source name files correctly, in normal use at least, and that jennifer (of

Bug#419866: ITP: ajaxtags -- Java based library supporting AJAX in Java Server Pages

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: ajaxtags Version : 1.2~beta3 Upstream Author : Darren L. Spurgeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://ajaxtags.sourceforge.net/ * License : Apache License Programming Lan

Re: should an init-script print output, if verbose is set to no in /etc/default/rcS or by /lib/init/vars.sh?

On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 06:31:35PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Petter Reinholdtsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > [Evgeni Golov] > > > Now my question to the init-gurus/maintainers is: is the behavior of > > > my script correct, or should verbose mean: "print minimal status > > > informati

Re: How to bet back to a sane version number?

On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 02:22:27PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > FWIW you can experiment quite easily using > > dpkg --compare-versions x lt y && echo Yes > > Interestingly, "4.22.." is considered higher than "4.22.3". I'm not sure > > if this is good advice though :-) > It's also a good ide

Re: merging BTS manual and d.o/Bugs documentation?

On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 02:26:30AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, Hi Nico! > Mario Iseli [0]reported that he started to translate the BTS > manual into german (good idea btw!) Thank you... > What makes me wonder is that there is also [1]another > manual which has more or less the same content a

Re: How to bet back to a sane version number?

On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 02:22:27PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > It's also a good idea to check against APT's implementation when > playing with strange version numbers (because it's not the same). Hrm? They used to be significantly different (apt wouldn't cope with numbers greater than ~0ul or