Work-needing packages report for Apr 20, 2007

2007-04-19 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 386 (new: 17) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 83 (new: 2) Total number of packages request

Re: Xorg 7.2

2007-04-19 Thread Michael Koch
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:57:08PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > If anyone has any mysterious contacts at Sun that they could talk to about > this, that'd be great. They've got the bug report in their database, and > since the whole "java-in-debian" thing was a totally backroom affair, I > have no

Re: TaskSel proposal (Was: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business)

2007-04-19 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 04:05:38PM +0200, Frans Pop a écrit : > On Thursday 19 April 2007 14:46, Andreas Tille wrote: > > IMHO the best solution would be if tasksel would have a two level > > selection: > > I doubt this is going to happen in the in tasksel. For one thing, its > maintainer has qui

Re: TaskSel proposal (Was: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business)

2007-04-19 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:46:35PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit : > On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Luis Matos wrote: > > >At least, we could preseed some options, (like debian-med) but that > >wouldn't come in tasksel's options, like kde-desktop and xfce-desktop. > > IMHO the best solution would be if task

Re: Error with fakeroot

2007-04-19 Thread Brian May
> "Clint" == Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I created one package. When I try to perform the below command, >> come this error: >> >> pc101:# fakeroot debian/rules binary fakeroot: FAKEROOTKEY set >> to 818929733 fakeroot: nested operation not yet supporte

Re: Xorg 7.2

2007-04-19 Thread Kevin Mark
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:57:08PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > If anyone has any mysterious contacts at Sun that they could talk to about > this, that'd be great. isn't there this new guy at Sun called 'ian murdoch' ;-) - -- | .''`. == Debian GNU/

Re: Xorg 7.2

2007-04-19 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 04:13:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:15:21PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > > Also of major note, Julien clarified my post a bit in the comments. Most of > > 7.2 is actually in unstable, including the drivers (in addition, we have > > pre-relea

HT400 parts

2007-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We would like to purchase HT 400 mud pump parts. Please advise availaibilty. Simon from Oman

Re: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

2007-04-19 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Joey Hess wrote: Andreas Tille wrote: Yes, you are right and I'm even doing this in the med-common package. But I do not really regard this as a really nice solution if those extra tasks are mixed with the default Debian tasks. Note that you can hide the debian tasks by d

Re: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

2007-04-19 Thread Otavio Salvador
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andreas Tille wrote: >> Yes, you are right and I'm even doing this in the med-common package. >> But I do not really regard this as a really nice solution if those >> extra tasks are mixed with the default Debian tasks. > > Note that you can hide the debian

Re: TaskSel proposal (Was: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business)

2007-04-19 Thread Joey Hess
Andreas Tille wrote: > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:50:03 -0400 Little more needs to be said, although you might find tools/update_tasks in debian-cd worthwhile reading (or not). -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: UNSUSCRIBE

2007-04-19 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:24:53AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2007 20.51:16 Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: > > man procmailrc > > On gmail? > gmail does support POP. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com sig

Re: TaskSel proposal (Was: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business)

2007-04-19 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Joey Hess wrote: Andreas Tille wrote: I think they probably will install via DVD or network. If tasksel keeps its "install from one CD medium" philosophy Tasksel does not have any such philisophy. Quoting from #186085 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Andreas

Re: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

2007-04-19 Thread Joey Hess
Andreas Tille wrote: > Yes, you are right and I'm even doing this in the med-common package. > But I do not really regard this as a really nice solution if those > extra tasks are mixed with the default Debian tasks. Note that you can hide the debian tasks by diverting debian-tasks.desc. This coul

Re: TaskSel proposal (Was: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business)

2007-04-19 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Joey Hess wrote: I'm afraid that I can't seriously consider this kind of proposal unless it shows indications of taking into account all the issues and design goals listed in http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/tasksel/faq/ The answer to question one is very compelling if you fo

Re: 1241 not binNMU-safe packages found in sid

2007-04-19 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Evgeni Golov [Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:15:31 +0200]: > You can find a list of the packages here: > http://files.die-welt.net/bad-depends-in-sid Lintian should be giving proper warnings about non binNMU-safe packages, have a look at /usr/share/lintian/checks/version-substvars{,.desc}. One should get

Re: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

2007-04-19 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Joey Hess wrote: Er, do you know that it's possible to create a deb that, when installed, extends tasksel with any tasks you like? And d-i has hooks to allow a CDD to easily install such debs. Yes, you are right and I'm even doing this in the med-common package. But I do n

Re: TaskSel proposal (Was: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business)

2007-04-19 Thread Joey Hess
Frans Pop wrote: > It should be possibly to define tasks for CDDs and have them included in > tasksel, but I do not think they will ever be displayed by default in the > regular tasksel or for regular installations. After all, we are talking > about custom debian _distributions_. I won't say "n

Re: TaskSel proposal (Was: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business)

2007-04-19 Thread Joey Hess
Andreas Tille wrote: > I think they probably will install via DVD or network. > If tasksel keeps its "install from one CD medium" philosophy Tasksel does not have any such philisophy. apt even supports using debconf to prompt for a CD change. d-i does not currently support scanning more than one C

Re: TaskSel proposal (Was: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business)

2007-04-19 Thread Joey Hess
Ben Armstrong wrote: > But as Luis pointed out, having material on extra CDs or needing the > network to install it is a bit of a problem. No, it's not, because d-i _first_ lets the user decide how they want to configure apt, and then displays a tasksel that offers only the tasks that are availabl

Re: TaskSel proposal (Was: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business)

2007-04-19 Thread Joey Hess
Andreas Tille wrote: > IMHO the best solution would be if tasksel would have a two level > selection: I'm afraid that I can't seriously consider this kind of proposal unless it shows indications of taking into account all the issues and design goals listed in http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/tasksel/

Re: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

2007-04-19 Thread Joey Hess
Luis Matos wrote: > tasksel is a good tool, but it really lacks expansibility ... mainly > because it was not made with that purpose. > > At least, we could preseed some options, (like debian-med) but that > wouldn't come in tasksel's options, like kde-desktop and xfce-desktop. Er, do you know tha

Re: 1241 not binNMU-safe packages found in sid

2007-04-19 Thread Andreas Metzler
Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:15:31PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote: ...] >> gave me all the diff.gz from sid, so I could grep for "(= >> ${Source-Version})", and the result was shocking: >> Out of 10126 diff.gzs I got from sid, 1241 have "bad" dependencies - >> t

Re: Error with fakeroot

2007-04-19 Thread Rodrigo Faria Tavares
Hello, I don't know. I want to execute the fakeroot with success best regards, Faria - Original Message - From: "Clint Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Rodrigo Tavares" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 10:53 AM Subject: Re: Error with fakeroot Hi, The comman

Re: TaskSel proposal (Was: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business)

2007-04-19 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 19 April 2007 16:46, Luis Matos wrote: > Also, can we arrange some kind of cdds-pre-selection in d-i? > > One page fter tasksel that would have the cdds listed, or previously. > Or at least an yes/no question, do you want to install any CDD? Note that I'm just thinking out load here. F

Bug#420025: ITP: firegpg -- an iceweasel extension to use gnupg in any web page

2007-04-19 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: firegpg Version : 0.3.3 Upstream Author : FireGPG Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://firegpg.tuxfamily.org * License : GPL Programming Lang: js Descrip

Re: TaskSel proposal (Was: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business)

2007-04-19 Thread Luis Matos
Well ... i think you exagerated a little bit. 2 layer is not multiple layer and tasksel is not apt, aptitude or synaptic. but it can be done. I'll give you the desktop task example. there is a team, debian-desktop that "supports" and organizes all desktop tasks. by this i mean that there sh

Re: TaskSel proposal (Was: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business)

2007-04-19 Thread Luis Matos
Frans Pop escreveu: On Thursday 19 April 2007 14:46, Andreas Tille wrote: IMHO the best solution would be if tasksel would have a two level selection: I doubt this is going to happen in the in tasksel. For one thing, its maintainer has quite strong feelings against it. For another t

Estas a un click de tu judaismo

2007-04-19 Thread laense
B”H   Ahora tenés la oportunidad de recibir " La Enseñanza Semanal ", un compendio de historias y reflexiones profundas sobre La Torá. Suscribite ingresando a: http://www.jabad.org.ar/Suscrip.asp Además Descubrí el mundo del judaísmo y la filosofía jasídica a través de www.jabad.org.ar       -

Re: TaskSel proposal (Was: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business)

2007-04-19 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 19 April 2007 14:46, Andreas Tille wrote: > IMHO the best solution would be if tasksel would have a two level > selection: I doubt this is going to happen in the in tasksel. For one thing, its maintainer has quite strong feelings against it. For another thing, a two-level selection i

Re: TaskSel proposal (Was: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business)

2007-04-19 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Ben Armstrong wrote: But as Luis pointed out, having material on extra CDs or needing the network to install it is a bit of a problem. Well, IMHO shipping Lenny on CDs is a little bit - how to say - oldfashioned, right? I don't think a warning alone is sufficient (What i

Re: Error with fakeroot

2007-04-19 Thread Clint Adams
> Hi, > > The command: > > pc01:package/fakeroot debian/rules > fakeroot: FAKEROOTKEY set to 818929733 > fakeroot: nested operation not yet supported > > Att, > > Faria Let's try this another way. Why is FAKEROOTKEY already set? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: Error with fakeroot

2007-04-19 Thread Rodrigo Tavares
Hi, The command: pc01:package/fakeroot debian/rules fakeroot: FAKEROOTKEY set to 818929733 fakeroot: nested operation not yet supported Att, Faria --- Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > I created one package. When I try to perform the > below > > command, come this error: > > >

Re: Error with fakeroot

2007-04-19 Thread Clint Adams
> I created one package. When I try to perform the below > command, come this error: > > pc101:# fakeroot debian/rules binary > fakeroot: FAKEROOTKEY set to 818929733 > fakeroot: nested operation not yet supporte > > Any suggestion ? Are you trying to run fakeroot within fakeroot? -- To UNSU

Error with fakeroot

2007-04-19 Thread Rodrigo Tavares
Hello, I created one package. When I try to perform the below command, come this error: pc101:# fakeroot debian/rules binary fakeroot: FAKEROOTKEY set to 818929733 fakeroot: nested operation not yet supporte Any suggestion ? best regards, Faria _

Re: TaskSel proposal (Was: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business)

2007-04-19 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:46:35 +0200 (CEST) Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Luis Matos wrote: > IMHO the best solution would be if tasksel would have a two level > selection: ... > [ ] Custom Debian Distribution > [ ] Debian-Edu > [ ] Debian-Jr.

ITP: mmsrip -- client for the mms:// protocol

2007-04-19 Thread David Paleino
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: mmsrip Version : 0.7.0 Upstream Author : Nicolas Benoit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://nbenoit.tuxfamily.org/projects.php?rq=mmsr

TaskSel proposal (Was: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business)

2007-04-19 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Luis Matos wrote: At least, we could preseed some options, (like debian-med) but that wouldn't come in tasksel's options, like kde-desktop and xfce-desktop. IMHO the best solution would be if tasksel would have a two level selection: [x] Desktop environment [x

Re: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

2007-04-19 Thread Luis Matos
Maybe some kind of proposal to change tsksels behaviour to warn user that the option he has choosen requires more cd's or download of files trought network. tasksel is a good tool, but it really lacks expansibility ... mainly because it was not made with that purpose. At least, we could preseed s

Re: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

2007-04-19 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Luis Matos wrote: it true it's debian, but ... i meant in debian's main (general) distribution, that is, as option in tasksel and not only as meta-package ... but there is no problem. Well, there is definitely more in Debian than you can select via tasksel. ;-)) But your

Re: 1241 not binNMU-safe packages found in sid

2007-04-19 Thread Michael Koch
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:15:31PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote: > Hi *, > > after the latest pgsql transition, pgadmin3 wasn't upgradable, because > of bad dependencies on pgadmin3-common - usual binNMU problem. > After that I've decided to look on the rest of sid - there may be other > bad dependen

Re: 1241 not binNMU-safe packages found in sid

2007-04-19 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:25:22 +0200 Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Out of 10126 diff.gzs I got from sid, 1241 have "bad" dependencies - > > time for mass-bugfilling? > > Have you checked that those are effectively dependencies from "Arch: any" > on "Arch: all" packages ? Well, I did not - this would e

Re: Xorg 7.2

2007-04-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:15:21PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > Also of major note, Julien clarified my post a bit in the comments. Most of > 7.2 is actually in unstable, including the drivers (in addition, we have > pre-release drivers for intel in experimental). The missing thing though is > the

Re: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

2007-04-19 Thread Luis Matos
cc'ing debian-custom so we can get off devel. Qua, 2007-04-18 às 22:34 +0200, Andreas Tille escreveu: > On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Luis Matos wrote: > > > A cdd would be good for some first testing, but having it included in > > debian would be great. > > Argh - the usual missunderstanding: If you use

Re: 1241 not binNMU-safe packages found in sid

2007-04-19 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2007-04-19, Evgeni Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can find a list of the packages here: > http://files.die-welt.net/bad-depends-in-sid There are some false positives. AFAIK at least kde* is binNMU'able. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

Re: 1241 not binNMU-safe packages found in sid

2007-04-19 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Evgeni Golov wrote: > Hi *, > > after the latest pgsql transition, pgadmin3 wasn't upgradable, because > of bad dependencies on pgadmin3-common - usual binNMU problem. > After that I've decided to look on the rest of sid - there may be other > bad dependencies I thought.

Re: 1241 not binNMU-safe packages found in sid

2007-04-19 Thread Loïc Minier
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007, Evgeni Golov wrote: > gave me all the diff.gz from sid, so I could grep for "(= > ${Source-Version})", and the result was shocking: > Out of 10126 diff.gzs I got from sid, 1241 have "bad" dependencies - > time for mass-bugfilling? I hope you did consider other information th

1241 not binNMU-safe packages found in sid

2007-04-19 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi *, after the latest pgsql transition, pgadmin3 wasn't upgradable, because of bad dependencies on pgadmin3-common - usual binNMU problem. After that I've decided to look on the rest of sid - there may be other bad dependencies I thought. debmirror --host=ftp.uni-koeln.de --dist=sid --arch=none