Hi all,
in the past the use of debconf notes has been discussed, and it seemed
to be general consensus that they are mostly useless (or misused), but
that there are still a couple of legitimate uses which prevent their
removal from debconf (or making them a no-op) [1]
Now I am at the point where
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jeremie Corbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kaa-base
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Authors: Jason Tackaberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dirk Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://freevo.org/kaa
* License
On 5/27/07, A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But I think that 'printtool' has outlived its usefullness: its database
of printers (that is actually contained in the package
'printfilters-ppd', for some strange reason) is outdated;
Have all of the printer files (especially the older ones) in
Hi,
>
> d-i uses the following hack to figure out where to download udebs from
> when building installation media:
>
> grep '^deb[ \t]' $(SYSTEM_SOURCES_LIST) \
> |grep -v '^deb[ \t]cdrom:' \
> |grep -v
> '\(security.debian.org\|volatile.debian.\(
Hi,
> > After 6 years or so of setting ftp.jp.debian.org as default for
> > pbuilder, I'm finally determined that it shouldn't stay like this. So
> > I'd like to have some default guessing to happen. Preferably I don't
> > want to ask via debconf, since users should have already answered the
> >
Le Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:36:05AM -0700, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:15:31PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Dear Hwei, Uwe and John,
> >
> > I did not manage to contact you in private (see below), therefore by
> > policy 10.1 I have to move the discussion on debian-devel (
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tmexpand
Version : 0.1.2.0
Upstream Author : John E. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : ftp://space.mit.edu/pub/davis/jed/tmexpand
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: S
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:15:31PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear Hwei, Uwe and John,
>
> I did not manage to contact you in private (see below), therefore by
> policy 10.1 I have to move the discussion on debian-devel (copy sent
> to debian-med). We (the members of the pkg-emboss project on
Vincent Fourmond dijo [Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:34:29AM +0200]:
> Hello dear debian Ruby developpers !
>
> If you are interested in having a ruby section (after all, we make
> up nearly half of the interpreter section) and if you didn't do it
> yet, please second the proposal for the creation
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 06:14:46AM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> 1. Change the Makefile and/or debian/rules as necessary to add -g to the
> compilation options.
Most already do that.
> 2. In debian/rules, comment out the instruction to strip the binaries
> (such as dh_strip).
No, use the enviro
Dear Hwei, Uwe and John,
I did not manage to contact you in private (see below), therefore by
policy 10.1 I have to move the discussion on debian-devel (copy sent to
debian-med). We (the members of the pkg-emboss project on Alioth) have
uploaded a new package in the experimental section of Debian,
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 19:49 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 27 May 2007 19:43, Joey Hess wrote:
> > d-i uses the following hack to figure out where to download udebs from
> > when building installation media:
>
> Note that this can result in multiple sources. If you want only one, this
> hack
"Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:56:12AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>>
>> Yes, you simply submit a bug report with a patch, and wait for a couple
>> of year for it to be applied.
>>
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=www
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:56:12AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>
> Yes, you simply submit a bug report with a patch, and wait for a couple
> of year for it to be applied.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=www.debian.org&archive=no&version=&dist=unstable&include=patch
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 09:39:31AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, if I did use emdebian, I would be mirroring
> > anything I need, and would be rather upset if emdebian tools would
> > insist on clogging my network connection (which I might not
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 27 May 2007 01:53, David Nusinow wrote:
>> The only thing I've ever heard about helping out with the website is
>> that it's a herculean task that no mere mortal should attempt.
>
> Yes, a complete redesign of the website is a herculean task, but
>
On Sun, 27 May 2007 22:42:41 +0300
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On su, 2007-05-27 at 20:06 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Unless your own mirror supports all Debian architectures, you will
> > still need a primary for emdebian-tools. Do you test build your own
> > Debian packages a
On Sun, 27 May 2007 20:53:18 +0100
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 12:25:50AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > After 6 years or so of setting ftp.jp.debian.org as default for
> > pbuilder, I'm finally determined that it shouldn't stay like this.
> > So I'd like
18 matches
Mail list logo
