Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ganeti Debian Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ganeti
Version : 1.2~b1
Upstream Author : Ganeti Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/ganeti/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: Python
Descr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Iustin Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ganeti
Version : 1.2~b1
Upstream Author : Google Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/ganeti/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 03:19:43PM -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
> The Debian OCaml maintenance team is looking at how to organize the
> HTML documentation provided by the various OCaml packages. Our first
Right, to add some details to that:
- each library we have (will) ship an HTML documentation of
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 01:15:57PM +0200, Alessandro De Zorzi wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Alessandro De Zorzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: original
IMHO this should be renamed to something less general like
original-webgallery.
Gaudenz
> Version
Reid Priedhorsky wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:00:13 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>>> Has there ever been a case where an RFP bug has actually stimulated anyone
>>> into packaging a given piece of software?
>> Yes, I've closed three RFPs during the last month or so,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessandro De Zorzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: original
Version : 0.11.2
Upstream Author : Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tuomas Kuosmanen <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> Larry Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://jimmac.mus
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 02:53:01PM -0300, Luciano Bello wrote:
> El Mar 17 Jul 2007, Jan Wagner escribió:
> > Hi Luciano,
> >
> > On Wednesday 20 June 2007 19:15, Luciano Bello wrote:
> > > I need your opinion and comments about: http://bugs.debian.org/399892
> > > Nepenthes has a module (modul
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 05:15:50PM +0200, Maarten Verwijs wrote:
> > The documentation I have found about the different versions and
> > process is somewhat vague.
>
> I'm sure that the Debian Documentation guys would like to receive your
> patches.
Even identifying the troublesome documentation
[Charles Plessy]
> Actually, I would be happy to hear opinions (in private if you think the
> question was trivial) on the follwing bug :
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425508
>
> Basically, IBM does not distribute anymore the tarballs supported by
> Etch's `java-package',
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessandro De Zorzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: phamm
Version : 0.4.13
Upstream Author : Alessandro De Zorzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.phamm.org/
* License : GPL v2
Programming Lang: PHP, Perl, Bash
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 08:39 +0100, Brett Parker wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:35:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > One issue is that only a few programs appear in the IceWM menu. The
> > rest you need to know the names of and type in by hand. I can of
> > course create a menu if I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Prokop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: op
Version : 1.32
Upstream Author : Alec Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://swapoff.org/wiki/op
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : sudo like
Le Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 01:45:40AM +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
>
> Only release-critical bugs are fixed in a stable release. You can get
> non-critical fixes for some packages by selective use of backports.org.
>
Actually, I would be happy to hear opinions (in private if you think the
questi
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:35:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One issue is that only a few programs appear in the IceWM menu. The
> rest you need to know the names of and type in by hand. I can of
> course create a menu if I have a prepackaged selection of software,
> which is what I
On 2007-08-28 12:22 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I don't have any time to work on this, but it occurred to me
> reading this that it might be useful for QA purposes to have a
> version of debuild that *unsanitizes* the environment to test
> robustness. An evil-debuild that sets every problematic
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 06:09:42AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 15:19:02 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > I think my work is mostly ready for unstable as it is. The last step is to
> > convince Guillem Jover, the main dpkg maintainer, to merge that in the
> > master branch.
16 matches
Mail list logo