Hi,
does somebody know about a solution to check whether one runs in a
buildd chroot or not? I need this to prevent hal from starting in buildd
chroots (via invoke-rc.d from postinst) as it breaks there because of
several reasons, including no /sys mounted.
This currently makes it impossible to ha
ti, 2007-09-25 kello 12:19 +1000, Ben Finney kirjoitti:
> Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > How do you determine that being able to [parse email addresses in
> > package metadata] is more important than concerns over disseminating
> > other people's email addresses without their permiss
On 24-Sep-07, 17:21 (CDT), Helmut Grohne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Description : graphical siteswap animator
>
> JuggleMaster is a siteswap animator. If you know what that is, great.
> If you don't, you can just install the program and look at some of the
> builtin patterns, without unde
Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How do you determine that being able to [parse email addresses in
> package metadata] is more important than concerns over disseminating
> other people's email addresses without their permission ?
They're distributing a work, with their chosen contact e
Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:34:35PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>> You seem to be suggesting that policy should require this *before* it
>> becomes common practice. That's not generally how policy is crafted:
>> Debian policy generally does not prescribe packa
I like text mode. Not because X and vga (adapters) sux, but because i
have no art vision at all. I amazed by any trivial paining and drawing,
required in art/architecture courses (not by official art, though).
I happened to see some ascii art occasionally, never thought, that
there was/is some kin
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 12:04:15AM +0200, Martin Uecker wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Actually, if you do not trust the path down which a binary
> > package flows, you can not use any information down that flow path to
> > test your implementation. You need to do
Hallo Goswin,
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some tools use randomization to get out of worst case situations or
> general optimization. For example when you look for an optimal
> allocation of register usage you can do a search by picking a random
> register allocation and repe
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:04:15 +0200, Martin Uecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:56:45 +0200, Martin Uecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> said:
>> Actually, if you do not trust the path down which a binary package
>> flows, you can not
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 08:43:09PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Hamish Moffatt [Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:18:34 +1000]:
>
> > Perhaps rt2500-source should recommend bzip2? The relationship seems to
> > fit the definition - a package that is usually installed along with it
> > but not strictly require
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Helmut Grohne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: jugglemaster
Version : 0.4
Upstream Authors: Gary Briggs, Per Johan Groland, Ken Matsuoka, Greg Gilbert
* URL : http://icculus.org/jugglemaster/
* License : GPL and modifi
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 08:35:50PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Martin Uecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think it would be really cool if the Debian policy required
> > that packages could be rebuild bit-identical from source.
> > At the moment, it is impossible to independly verif
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:56:45 +0200, Martin Uecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > If policy would require the exact reproducability of binaries, then it
> > would be a policy violation.
>
>That is not how things work around here. In a case l
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 09:02:23PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 01:17:44PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > On 24-Sep-07, 04:30 (CDT), Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 2007-09-24 18:21 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > > > Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 01:17:44PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 24-Sep-07, 04:30 (CDT), Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2007-09-24 18:21 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > > Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > On 2007-09-23 17:22 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> >
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 08:35:50PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> Some tools use randomization to get out of worst case situations or
> general optimization. For example when you look for an optimal
> allocation of register usage you can do a search by picking a random
> register allocatio
* Hamish Moffatt [Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:18:34 +1000]:
> Perhaps rt2500-source should recommend bzip2? The relationship seems to
> fit the definition - a package that is usually installed along with it
> but not strictly required.
Can you tell us in which "unusual installation" is a package that *on
Martin Uecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Patrick Winnertz wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, 18. September 2007 21:12:44 schrieb Julien Cristau:
>> > > Hmmhh, what do you do about programs etc that encode the build-time in
>> > > the binary? I mean they obviously will change between builds?
>> >
>> > Hopef
On 24-Sep-07, 04:30 (CDT), Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-09-24 18:21 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On 2007-09-23 17:22 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > > The package should include in the copyright file the correct email
> >
On 23-Sep-07, 19:18 (CDT), Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:00:25AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 08:40 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > > I wouldn't expect rt2500-source to depend on bzip2 any more than I
> > > expect any package provi
David Given wrote:
> You've got two major tasks ahead of you:
>
> - - port gcc
>
> - - port the kernel
>
> - - cross-compile a basic userland
>
Nobody expects the Spanish inquisition.
Actually, there is one more major headache, which is porting a boot
loader. Probably uBoot or something similar
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:30:48 -0400, Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:34:35PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>> You seem to be suggesting that policy should require this *before* it
>> becomes common practice. That's not generally how policy is crafted:
>> Debian policy
Hope Lugo
unbelievable 18+ offer
www.xxxpromo dot cn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2007-09-24 18:21 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 2007-09-23 17:22 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > The package should include in the copyright file the correct email
> > > address for whatever contact information the upstream author(s)
> > > use to
Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2007-09-23 17:22 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > The package should include in the copyright file the correct email
> > address for whatever contact information the upstream author(s)
> > use to receive queries from users and other people.
>
> This e
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Andre Majorel wrote:
> This email address will be used by humans. Why does it have to be
> machine readable ?
Because it will be read by machines too, of course. Unless you plan on
never allowing the information in the copyright file to be extracted
by anything which is rather
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:02:01 +0200, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On 11150 March 1977, Marc Haber wrote:
>>>Same goes for those idiots with
>>>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" addresses.
>> Using a plus sign in the mail address is a _very_ _very_ effective
>> spam filter.
>
>I dont care about the +.
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:34:35PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> You seem to be suggesting that policy should require this *before* it
> becomes common practice. That's not generally how policy is crafted:
> Debian policy generally does not prescribe packaging practice, but
> rather describes it.
Cal
On 2007-09-23 17:22 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Andre Majorel wrote:
> > On 2007-09-20 23:10 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> >
> > > I would not be against a policy requirement that email addresses
> > > in package metadata should be the literal address without
> > > munging.
> >
On 23/09/07 at 23:32 +0200, Martin Uecker wrote:
>
> Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 18. September 2007 21:12:44 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> > > > Hmmhh, what do you do about programs etc that encode the build-time in
> > > > the binary? I mean they obviously will change between builds?
> >
30 matches
Mail list logo
