-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
First of all, I think it's a great idea.
Well, we have the src packages then we only needs other package '-dbg'.
This one only need to change the options and install the libraries
needed, It could make all the work to leave the dbg program ready to
us
Carlos San Esteban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First of all, I think it's a great idea.
> Well, we have the src packages then we only needs other package '-dbg'.
> This one only need to change the options and install the libraries
> needed, It could make all the work to leave the dbg program re
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Carlos San Esteban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> First of all, I think it's a great idea.
>> Well, we have the src packages then we only needs other package '-dbg'.
>> This one only need to change the options and install the libraries
>> needed, It coul
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 01:56:03AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> Is there a reason to still keep kbd around?
Kbd has upstream maintainer, console-tools is dead. Because of this
Alastair McKinstry has already tagged several bugs as wontfix [*].
The transition from console-tools to kbd has been
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Martin-Éric Racine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: uspp
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Isaac Barona Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ibarona.googlepages.com/uspp
* L
* Pierre Habouzit:
>> (I don't know anything about Perforce. Perhaps it's really dangerous
>> software. But perhaps it's just non-free.)
>
> OTOH I'm always reluctant to see new things enter non-free when there
> is perfectly suitable alternatives. I mean git, hg, bzr, or even the
> horrible s
also sprach Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.1059 +0100]:
> In particular, I have seen MTAs which would (taking your situation as
> a concrete example, and when relaying mail eg as a smarthost), after
> receiving a mail with
>RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> would look lapse.madduck.net
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libdevel-ebug-perl
Version : 0.48
Upstream Author : Leon Brocard, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~lbrocard/Devel-ebug-0.48/
* License : as Perl itself
martin f krafft writes ("Re: RFC 2?821 and CNAMEs"):
> Of course I can ensure that, and that's what I had a while ago: for
> each of my road-warriors (rw.madduck.net; 19 of them; no, not all
> laptops; long story), I had a separate pair of MX RRs.
>
> I sought to simplify that and created rw.maddu
RFC 1123 contains this requirement:
5.2.2 Canonicalization: RFC-821 Section 3.1
The domain names that a Sender-SMTP sends in MAIL and RCPT
commands MUST have been "canonicalized," i.e., they must be
fully-qualified principal names or domain literals, not
also sprach Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.1145 +0100]:
> RFC 1123 contains this requirement:
>
> 5.2.2 Canonicalization: RFC-821 Section 3.1
>
> The domain names that a Sender-SMTP sends in MAIL and RCPT
> commands MUST have been "canonicalized," i.e., t
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 11:35:15AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Martin-Éric Racine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> * Package name: uspp
> Version : 1.0
> Upstream Author : Isaac Barona
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: displayconfig-gtk
Version: 0.3.3
Upstream Author: Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Sebastian
Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL: https://la
On 08-Oct-07, 16:15 (CDT), "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:41:21PM -0400, Roberto C. S??nchez wrote:
> > Given the great abundance of revision control systems already packaged
> > for Debian, what is the point of adding another?
>
> I don't see the r
Quoting Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> The transition from console-tools to kbd has been planned for years
> and the only reason of the delay is the chronic shortage of console
> maintainers in Debian. It seems Alastair supports only console-tools
> and for the rest it is only me and Chris
Thomas Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Debian VDR Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: vdr-plugin-xine
> Version : 0.7.11
> Upstream Author : Reinhard Nißl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://home.vrweb.de/~rn
Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Robert Edmonds wrote:
>> This package provides the source code for the tg3dfsg kernel
>> module. Kernel source or headers are required to compile this module.
>>
>> This driver complies with GR 2006-004 and should support all Tigon3
>> hardware except for 5701a0 chipse
Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > Any modification to the tg3 driver to produce a GR 2006-004 compliant
> > driver would have to diverge from the kernel team's patch acceptance
> > guidelines[0] since upstream is intransigent[1] on making tg3
> > firmware-free or firmware-optional
Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Any modification to the tg3 driver to produce a GR 2006-004 compliant
> driver would have to diverge from the kernel team's patch acceptance
> guidelines[0] since upstream is intransigent[1] on making tg3
> firmware-free or firmware-optional. The kernel team does not appear
Hi,
* Reinhard Tartler schrieb am 10.10.07, um 18:39 Uhr:
> Right, but xine-lib in unstable doesn't support it. It will work with
> xine-lib in experimental though, but that is the xine-lib-1.2
> development branch. There is still a lot of work to do there, so I'm
> curious how you plan to package
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 02:57:59 pm Robert Edmonds wrote:
> The only rationale for removing the *firmware* is compliance with GR
> 2006-004...
Reading this feels about like reading someone write, "The only rationale for
not smoking cigarettes in this restaurant is compliance with state law."
* martin f. krafft:
> also sprach Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.1145 +0100]:
>> RFC 1123 contains this requirement:
>>
>> 5.2.2 Canonicalization: RFC-821 Section 3.1
>>
>> The domain names that a Sender-SMTP sends in MAIL and RCPT
>> commands MUST have b
On 2007-10-10, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 October 2007 02:57:59 pm Robert Edmonds wrote:
>> The only rationale for removing the *firmware* is compliance with GR
>> 2006-004...
>
> Reading this feels about like reading someone write, "The only rationale for
> not s
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 08:41:13AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Any reason why your 5701a0-removal patch can't be applied to our kernel
> packages?
None, at least from my point of view. Just someone have to do it. (See
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on d-kernel.)
Bastian
--
There are some things worth
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 12:44:54AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> None, at least from my point of view. Just someone have to do it. (See
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on d-kernel.)
The attached patch should apply on the pruned version.
Bastian
--
We have found all life forms in the galaxy are capable of
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 01:03:35AM -0700, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Oh, your private e-mail helped me understand what you're proposing.
> You're saying that we could set it up so that the local user could build
> the -dbg packages if they need them.
At this point, wha
tag 446050 help
thanks
The current version of liferea in Debian unstable (1.4.3-1), as well
as the latest upstream version (1.4.5) fail if used together with
libsqlite3-0 from experimental (3.5.1-1). The program works correctly
with the versions in testing and unstable (3.4.2-1, 3.4.2-2).
The fol
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The current version of liferea in Debian unstable (1.4.3-1), as well as
> the latest upstream version (1.4.5) fail if used together with
> libsqlite3-0 from experimental (3.5.1-1). The program works correctly
> with the versions in testing a
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:42:35 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
[...]
> Internet mail
> addresses (which are passed to /usr/sbin/sendmail, for instance) must be
> canonicalized before they are used in SMTP. At least that's the theory;
> Exim doesn't do it.
And apparently on purpose:
Exim delibe
29 matches
Mail list logo
