Re: Bug#459776: RFP: manpages-cs -- Czech manual pages

2008-01-08 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Michal Čihař ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Okay, wget did the job and managed to download sources while I was at > lunch, so I will look at this package. Anyway upload will probably not > happen until utf-8 man pages will be supported. Please note that, in the past, the login and/or passwd pack

Re: Is Davide Puricelli MIA?

2008-01-08 Thread Bart Martens
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 16:47 +0100, Davide Puricelli wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 04:33:18PM +0600, Ivan Shmakov wrote: > > Does someone know if Davide Puricelli (evo at debian.org) is > > MIA? > > > > Apparently, the last upload by him was on 2007-06-10 [1]. I've > > tried to

Re: List of packages defining a RPATH on amd64 (differs from i386/lintian.d.o)

2008-01-08 Thread Raphael Geissert
Russ Allbery wrote: > > Oh, the other challenge with running lintian across multiple architectures > is that, at least in previous days, some things didn't work right unless > the binutils installed corresponded to the package architecture. I wonder > if that's still true. > What kind of proble

Re: Bug#459627: ITP: libdmtx-dev -- header files for libdmtx

2008-01-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 09/01/2008, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > Which is what I did...but I grokked that I was supposed to create an > ITP for each .deb, not for each source package. One per source package. You could eventually specify after the usual fields and the descriptions that you're going to build binaries foo, ba

Re: Bug#459627: ITP: libdmtx-dev -- header files for libdmtx

2008-01-08 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 07:30:30PM -0800, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:51:25AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > What you want instead is one source package creating 3 binary packages. > Which is what I did...but I grokked that I was supposed to create an ITP > for each .deb, no

Re: List of packages defining a RPATH on amd64 (differs from i386/lintian.d.o)

2008-01-08 Thread Russ Allbery
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 17:01:27 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Oh, the other challenge with running lintian across multiple >> architectures is that, at least in previous days, some things didn't >> work right unless the binutils installed corresponded to

Re: Bug#459776: RFP: manpages-cs -- Czech manual pages

2008-01-08 Thread Michal Čihař
owner 459776 ! retitle 459776 ITP: manpages-cs -- Czech manual pages thanks Hi On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:15:57 + Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: manpages-cs > Version : 0.17.20070905 > Upstream Author : hajma > *

Re: Bug#459627: ITP: libdmtx-dev -- header files for libdmtx

2008-01-08 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:51:25AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > What you want instead is one source package creating 3 binary packages. Which is what I did...but I grokked that I was supposed to create an ITP for each .deb, not for each source package. If that was in error, I can close all three

Re: Bug#459776: RFP: manpages-cs -- Czech manual pages

2008-01-08 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:15:57 + Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: manpages-cs > Version : 0.17.20070905 > Upstream Author : hajma > * URL : http://sweb.cz/tropikhajma/man-pages-cs/index.html > * Lice

Re: List of packages defining a RPATH on amd64 (differs from i386/lintian.d.o)

2008-01-08 Thread Guillem Jover
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 17:01:27 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Oh, the other challenge with running lintian across multiple architectures > is that, at least in previous days, some things didn't work right unless > the binutils installed corresponded to the package architecture. I wonder > if that's

Re: Bug#459627: ITP: libdmtx-dev -- header files for libdmtx

2008-01-08 Thread Michael Biebl
Todd A. Jacobs wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Todd A. Jacobs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libdmtx-dev Version : 0.4.0-codegnome.3 Upstream Author : Mike Laughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.libdmtx.org/ * License : LGPL P

Re: Bug#459778: ITP: tinydyndns -- pop-before-dyndns service using djbdns

2008-01-08 Thread Joel Franco
On Tue Jan 08 08 16:44, Gerrit Pape wrote: >tinydyndns is a simple but powerful dynamic DNS solution that uses >djbdns. It cooperates with the djbdns package to publish dynamic IP >addresses authenticated through POP connections. On successfully >authenticated POP connections, the tinydyndns-upda

Re: List of packages defining a RPATH on amd64 (differs from i386/lintian.d.o)

2008-01-08 Thread Russ Allbery
"Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Perhaps lucas could use his access to Grid'5000 to do these lintian runs > when you upgrade lintian? I imagine that would take very little time to > do on the grid. There would need to be some way of merging the results > back to lintian.d.o and ensuring t

Re: List of packages defining a RPATH on amd64 (differs from i386/lintian.d.o)

2008-01-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Jan 9, 2008 5:15 AM, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Make lintian.d.o process debs from architectures other than i386/all > > It already takes over a day for Lintian to process the entire archive, so > I don't have any immediate plans to run it on more architectures unless we > ca

Re: List of packages defining a RPATH on amd64 (differs from i386/lintian.d.o)

2008-01-08 Thread Russ Allbery
Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Russ Allbery wrote: >> I suppose we could do something fancy where the archive is rebuilt in >> the background, but gluck doesn't have a lot of spare cycles as it is, >> and I'm not sure it's worth the effort at the moment to get coverage of >> the re

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-08 Thread Ben Finney
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Finney wrote: > > Why do you think "debian package" is proper capitalisation? What does > > the word "debian" refer to in that term, if not Debian? > > A package format. That format is called "the Debian package format", surely? -- \ "

Re: List of packages defining a RPATH on amd64 (differs from i386/lintian.d.o)

2008-01-08 Thread Raphael Geissert
Russ Allbery wrote: > > That's what we do now. It takes about a half-hour, usually, or less. > However, when I upgrade lintian.d.o to a new version of lintian, I have to > regenerate the entire results for the whole archive to have consistent > results, and I don't want that to take a week. > >

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-08 Thread Joey Hess
Ben Finney wrote: > Why do you think "debian package" is proper capitalisation? What does > the word "debian" refer to in that term, if not Debian? A package format. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-08 Thread Ben Finney
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Raphael Geissert wrote: > > Some weeks ago I noticed that some package descriptions > > incorrectly spell some project names, mainly because of > > capitalisation. [...] > > I can't help but roll my eyes at this. There are so many valid reasons > to write "

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 05:36:50PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Raphael Geissert wrote: > > Some weeks ago I noticed that some package descriptions incorrectly spell > > some project names, mainly because of capitalisation. > > For example GNOME is being spelt in some packages as Gnome, or simply gnom

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-08 Thread Russ Allbery
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can't help but roll my eyes at this. There are so many valid reasons > to write "linux", "debian", or even "gnome" or "xerox"^W"kde". You can find > some good in examples in the descriptions of devscripts and debhelper > ("debian/", "debian package") whic

Re: List of packages defining a RPATH on amd64 (differs from i386/lintian.d.o)

2008-01-08 Thread Russ Allbery
Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Russ Allbery wrote: >> It already takes over a day for Lintian to process the entire archive, >> so I don't have any immediate plans to run it on more architectures >> unless we can find some dramatic way to speed it up or find other >> places to run

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-08 Thread Joey Hess
Raphael Geissert wrote: > Some weeks ago I noticed that some package descriptions incorrectly spell > some project names, mainly because of capitalisation. > For example GNOME is being spelt in some packages as Gnome, or simply gnome, > when its right spelling: GNOME. Other project names such as De

Re: Bug#458819: ITP: nettee -- a network "tee" program

2008-01-08 Thread Joel Franco
Hi Joe, I already have corrected that issues and i've send the answer but appears that it didn't get there. I will answer it again. Thank you very much. On Tue Jan 08 08 14:38, Joe Smith wrote: > > "Joel Franco" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> HEY SPONSORS.. PLEASE LOOK NETTEE

Re: List of packages defining a RPATH on amd64 (differs from i386/lintian.d.o)

2008-01-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 08/01/2008, Raphael Geissert wrote: > According to some people (I remember reading something about it in > -mentors) chrpath doesn't always remove the rpath, although I can't > confirm (I've never used chrpath) it should be investigated. Either it is misused, or bugs should be opened. The BTS c

Re: List of packages defining a RPATH on amd64 (differs from i386/lintian.d.o)

2008-01-08 Thread Raphael Geissert
Cyril Brulebois wrote: > On 08/01/2008, Michal Čihař wrote: >> Adding --disable-rpath to configure might be easier solution for this >> problem. > > Another workaround is chrpath. > According to some people (I remember reading something about it in -mentors) chrpath doesn't always remove the rpa

Re: List of packages defining a RPATH on amd64 (differs from i386/lintian.d.o)

2008-01-08 Thread Raphael Geissert
Russ Allbery wrote: > "Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Jan 8, 2008 1:32 PM, Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: > >>> Some time ago I noticed some packages were defining a RPATH on non i386 >>> architectures, notably amd64. > >> Is either of these planned? > >> * Make lin

Re: List of packages defining a RPATH on amd64 (differs from i386/lintian.d.o)

2008-01-08 Thread Russ Allbery
"Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Jan 8, 2008 1:32 PM, Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Some time ago I noticed some packages were defining a RPATH on non i386 >> architectures, notably amd64. > Is either of these planned? > * Make lintian.d.o process debs from architect

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-08 Thread Russ Allbery
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 11:54:32PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >> BTW, the way that the Lintian spell-checking works is that it looks for >> errors rather than looking for each word in a dictionary. It has a >> table of pairs of error and correct wo

Re: Bug#458819: ITP: nettee -- a network "tee" program

2008-01-08 Thread Joe Smith
"Joel Franco" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] HEY SPONSORS.. PLEASE LOOK NETTEE :) I'm guessing that sponsors are waiting for your acknowledgment and correction of the issues mentioned in http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2008/01/msg00034.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Re: Is Davide Puricelli MIA?

2008-01-08 Thread Ivan Shmakov
> Davide Puricelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Does someone know if Davide Puricelli (evo at debian.org) is MIA? >> Apparently, the last upload by him was on 2007-06-10 [1]. I've >> tried to communicate him last year, but didn't succeed. >> I've mostly interested in the `chicken' pac

Bug#459778: ITP: tinydyndns -- pop-before-dyndns service using djbdns

2008-01-08 Thread Gerrit Pape
tinydyndns is a simple but powerful dynamic DNS solution that uses djbdns. It cooperates with the djbdns package to publish dynamic IP addresses authenticated through POP connections. On successfully authenticated POP connections, the tinydyndns-update program manipulates tinydns' constant databa

Re: netconf control socket protocol: rfc822, xml-rpc, or dbus

2008-01-08 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On mar, jan 08, 2008 at 11:32:29 +, martin f krafft wrote: > While working on Ikiwiki, it dawned on me that I really ought to be > using XML RPC for this [2]. Why? Because it's already > there to do exactly the kind of thing I am doing, and standardised. > Furthermore, dbus *is* XML RPC. Tha

Re: Is Davide Puricelli MIA?

2008-01-08 Thread Davide Puricelli
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 04:33:18PM +0600, Ivan Shmakov wrote: > Does someone know if Davide Puricelli (evo at debian.org) is > MIA? > > Apparently, the last upload by him was on 2007-06-10 [1]. I've > tried to communicate him last year, but didn't succeed. > > I've

Bug#459776: RFP: manpages-cs -- Czech manual pages

2008-01-08 Thread Colin Watson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: manpages-cs Version : 0.17.20070905 Upstream Author : hajma * URL : http://sweb.cz/tropikhajma/man-pages-cs/index.html * License : various, but "all freely distributable"; presumably same lice

Re: RFH: How to debug FTBFS of erlang on sparc (UltraSPARC III)?

2008-01-08 Thread Michael Shuler
On 01/08/2008 09:51 AM, Sergei Golovan wrote: Which kernel version do you have installed? But anyway, if the build is successful then this machine is useless for me :) It is an Etch scratch box running 2.6.18-5-sparc64. You could certainly upgrade/install anything on the box you would like to

Re: RFH: How to debug FTBFS of erlang on sparc (UltraSPARC III)?

2008-01-08 Thread Sergei Golovan
On 1/8/08, Michael Shuler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 01/07/2008 04:29 PM, Sergei Golovan wrote: > > I can't build it on UltraSPARC III because I don't have an access to > > it. > > Have you gotten access to a machine, Sergei? If not, let me know, I > would be happy to give you a login. I suc

Re: RFH: How to debug FTBFS of erlang on sparc (UltraSPARC III)?

2008-01-08 Thread Michael Shuler
On 01/07/2008 04:29 PM, Sergei Golovan wrote: I can't build it on UltraSPARC III because I don't have an access to it. Have you gotten access to a machine, Sergei? If not, let me know, I would be happy to give you a login. I successfully (slowly) built erlang_11.b.5dfsg-12 last night with p

Re: netconf control socket protocol: rfc822, xml-rpc, or dbus

2008-01-08 Thread Chris Hanson
On 1/8/08, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Furthermore, dbus *is* XML RPC. Umm, no -- dbus is a custom binary protocol. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: netconf control socket protocol: rfc822, xml-rpc, or dbus

2008-01-08 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 08 janvier 2008 à 12:32 +0100, martin f krafft a écrit : > Many people have suggested using dbus for this, but I always refused > because I did not want the dependency. OK, now just have a look at what has been proposed, and please reconsider this decision. The dbus library is 300 KB of

Bug#459753: ITP: btk-core -- Biomolecule Toolkit C++ library

2008-01-08 Thread Morten Kjeldgaard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Morten Kjeldgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: btk-core Version : 0.8.1 Upstream Author : Tim Robertson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/btk/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C++ De

Re: netconf control socket protocol: rfc822, xml-rpc, or dbus

2008-01-08 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, martin f krafft wrote: However, that would be independendent of the control socket, for which I still need a protocol. CORBA? There is excellent support for it from C++, and since the interface definitions are compiled into stub code rather than including a full parser covering all eve

Re: testing migration/autobuilding postgresql-filedump-8.2

2008-01-08 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:45:29PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> On 07/01/2008, Michael Meskes wrote: >>> Now the question ariss, what went wrong? And also of course could >>> someone please reschedule this package or do whatever is needed to get >>>

Re: reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2008-01-08 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Am 8.1.2008 schrieb "Javier Fernandez-Sanguino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >I do not suggest you report automatically, as you will not review >false positives. That wasn't my plan; acutally listmasters strongly discourage from doing so. Problem was, that I sorted spam to one directory, and was to lazy

Re: reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2008-01-08 Thread Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
> Am 8.1.2008 schrieb "Kumar Appaiah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Would be cool, if your script would then automatically detect, if the > mail was received via bts or via a list and bounce it to the correct > report address. I do not suggest you report automatically, as you will not review false positi

Re: netconf control socket protocol: rfc822, xml-rpc, or dbus

2008-01-08 Thread Neil Williams
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 12:32 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > Hi there, > > As you may know, netconf[0] sports a control socket with which you > can control a running instance of the daemon. The idea is that tools > like /sbin/ifup then are nothing more than clients of this socket, > issuing the rig

Re: testing migration/autobuilding postgresql-filedump-8.2

2008-01-08 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:45:29PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > On 07/01/2008, Michael Meskes wrote: > > Now the question ariss, what went wrong? And also of course could > > someone please reschedule this package or do whatever is needed to get > > this version into the archive. > > Being buil

netconf control socket protocol: rfc822, xml-rpc, or dbus

2008-01-08 Thread martin f krafft
Hi there, As you may know, netconf[0] sports a control socket with which you can control a running instance of the daemon. The idea is that tools like /sbin/ifup then are nothing more than clients of this socket, issuing the right commands to the daemon process. 0. http://netconf.alioth.debian.or

Is Davide Puricelli MIA?

2008-01-08 Thread Ivan Shmakov
Does someone know if Davide Puricelli (evo at debian.org) is MIA? Apparently, the last upload by him was on 2007-06-10 [1]. I've tried to communicate him last year, but didn't succeed. I've mostly interested in the `chicken' package. The last vers

Bug#459729: ITP: pyglet -- a cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python

2008-01-08 Thread Michael Hanke
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: pyglet Version : 1.0~beta3 Upstream Author : Alex Holkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.pyglet.org * License : BSD Programming Lang: Python Description :

Re: reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2008-01-08 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 04:26:30PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > macro index , "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > macro index , "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" OK, the second index should be `pager'. And I just tested it on a real spam with report-listspam@, and it works! :-) Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel,

Re: reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2008-01-08 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 12:41:23PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > Would be cool, if your script would then automatically detect, if the > mail was received via bts or via a list and bounce it to the correct > report address. Er, that's too cool, but here's a simple one to start. Just add this t

Re: reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2008-01-08 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi! Am 8.1.2008 schrieb "Kumar Appaiah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [ reporting spam to listmasters and bts admins ] >I think a single keystroke can be scripted for this. I'll try later >tonight, though someone else is welcome to do this ahead of me. :-) Would be cool, if your script would then auto

Re: reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2008-01-08 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:29:21PM +0100, Amaya wrote: > That is incredibly useful, is tehre any similar tool to report spam > delivered through the Debian Mailing Lists? > > Sorry if this has been answered before, I am just starting to keep up > with mail backlog. Well, the steps are simply: 1.

Re: List of packages defining a RPATH on amd64 (differs from i386/lintian.d.o)

2008-01-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Jan 8, 2008 1:32 PM, Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some time ago I noticed some packages were defining a RPATH on non i386 > architectures, notably amd64. Is either of these planned? * Make lintian.d.o process debs from architectures other than i386/all * A way to put all thes

Re: reporting BTS spam easily from Mutt

2008-01-08 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:29:21PM +0100, Amaya wrote: > Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > In case it's useful to anyone, here's a quick hack I put together for > > easy BTS spam reporting from mutt. > > That is incredibly useful, is tehre any similar tool to report spam > delivered through the Debia

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-08 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-02 13:17]: > Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >tess (U) Fixed: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2008/01/msg00693.html Thanks for spotting this problem. -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

Re: List of packages defining a RPATH on amd64 (differs from i386/lintian.d.o)

2008-01-08 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 06:20:20AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > On 08/01/2008, Michal Čihař wrote: > > Adding --disable-rpath to configure might be easier solution for this > > problem. > > Another workaround is chrpath. > which is my preferred dirty trick when I'm not enable to manage the up

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-08 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 11:54:32PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > BTW, the way that the Lintian spell-checking works is that it looks for > errors rather than looking for each word in a dictionary. It has a table > of pairs of error and correct word. So if you notice any common > misspelled words t

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-08 Thread Ralf Treinen
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:07:14AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On lun, 2008-01-07 at 20:06 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > Some weeks ago I noticed that some package descriptions incorrectly > > spell > > some project names, mainly because of capitalisation. > > For example GNOME is being

Bug#459699: ITP: sdlroads -- SDL-based recreation of classic plane-jump game

2008-01-08 Thread Christopher Schmidt
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Christopher Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: sdlroads Version : 0.10 Upstream Author : Peter Newman * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdlroads/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description :