On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:53:37PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 23:48:21 +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > Although not very probably, until now Debian used to support static linking
> > (libdev packages provide .a files, and depend on libdev packages that
> > pro
also sprach Anibal Avelar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.02.26.0805 +0100]:
> http://fixxxer.cc/images/mascot/Penguin_Fat.gif
> http://fixxxer.cc/images/mascot/Jhas.png
> http://fixxxer.cc/images/mascot/little_pinguin.jpg
> http://fixxxer.cc/images/mascot/calimero.jpg
> http://fixxxer.cc/images/mascot/A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/25/08, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On su, 2008-02-24 at 19:48 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Sam Hocevar [2008.02.24.1316 +0100]:
> > >I also would like to spend some Debian money on a contest, similar to
> > > the FreeBSD logo
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 09:39 +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > > Feel free to pass it to me for adding your hints into
> > > package.
> >
> > Would it make sense to make a page in the wiki about it? That might
> > make it easier for peo
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > Feel free to pass it to me for adding your hints into
> > package.
>
> Would it make sense to make a page in the wiki about it? That might
> make it easier for people to add hints :)
Great idea. Please check: http://wiki.debian.org/For
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:57 AM, nic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried to send 2 messages but I guess they failed because of the
> attached files (~ 6 mb)? so where can I put the drafts? citation below.
If you don't have your own server, try one of these sites:
http://www.google.com/search?
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:05:46AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Aaron M. Ucko said:
> > Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > BTW, I think that hg is now the only VCS package which is not maintained
> > > in its
> > > own VCS format. (or are there
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 09:31:10PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:34:55 +1100, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >>
> >> > No matter what you want to say about your featu
This one time, at band camp, Julien Cristau said:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 23:48:21 +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
>
> > Although not very probably, until now Debian used to support static linking
> > (libdev packages provide .a files, and depend on libdev packages that
> > provide depende
This one time, at band camp, Aaron M. Ucko said:
> [migrating to -curiosa]
>
> Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > BTW, I think that hg is now the only VCS package which is not maintained in
> > its
> > own VCS format. (or are there other packages, too?)
>
> $ apt-cache showsr
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 03:56:49AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> No, it does not. If branch A has
> pi = 2.34567;
>and branch B has
> pi = 3.14159;
>
> No matter how much quilting you do you cannot reconcile the
> fundamental conflict in the final. Either pi is 3.14159; o
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I stopped providing static libraries in all my library packages quite a
> while back. No one used them, and they were just needless bloat. I
> can't say I would be upset if we dropped all the static libraries from
> the entire archive--is there actually
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefan Sobernig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xotcl
Version : 1.6.0+
Upstream Author : Gustaf Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Uwe Zdun <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.xotcl.org/
* License : BSD
Programming La
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:48:21PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > > While it is easy for build-dependency (just use libcurl4-gnutls-dev |
> > > libcurl3-gnutls-dev), I see a problem here with libdev package
> > > dependency. It should depend not on libcurl4-gnutls-dev |
> > > libcurl3-gnut
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Frank K??ster wrote:
Uh, you can dpkg-divert conffiles, but not generally configuration files, since
many won't even be known to dpkg. I must admit I'm a bit sceptical about a
proposal on configuration, written by someone who lets this important
distinction slip by...
No,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:03:59PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> [crossposted to debian-{devel,[EMAIL PROTECTED];
> Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
This still applies.
> Summary: around 400 *-perl packages have a debian/rules bug that
> makes them FTBFS with perl 5.10, currently in experimenta
[ Reply-To: set to debian-cd list ]
Hi Julian,
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:17:46PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>Dear Debian Developers (and other readers),
>
>debimg will be a free alternative to debian-cd, written
>in Python.
I hope you're not meaning to imply that debian-cd itself is _not
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 19:48 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.02.24.1316 +0100]:
> >I also would like to spend some Debian money on a contest, similar to
> > the FreeBSD logo contest [2], to create a friendly mascot for the Debian
> > project (in
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:11:05AM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> >> While it is easy for build-dependency (just use libcurl4-gnutls-dev |
> >> libcurl3-gnutls-dev), I see a problem here with libdev package
> >> dependency. It should depend not on libcurl4-gnutls-dev |
> >> libcurl3-gnutls-d
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> Hi
>
> I maintain libetpan package, which build-depends on libcurl4-gnutls-dev.
> Resulting library package dependency is calculated using ${shlib:Depends},
> however libdev package dependency on libcurl4-gnutls-dev is manually
> written in debian/control file. The
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:56:09PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
>
>> I maintain libetpan package, which build-depends on libcurl4-gnutls-dev.
>> Resulting library package dependency is calculated using
>> ${shlib:Depends}, however libdev package dependency on
>> libcurl4-gnutls-dev is m
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 04:25:06PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Humm
>
>
>
> And why not a marmot ??
Screw marmots. What about a human?
I would suggest this one:
http://people.debian.org/~amaya/wallpapers/dsc01074.jpg
--
1KB // Microsoft corollary to Hanlon's razor:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:48:21PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > > > While it is easy for build-dependency (just use
> > > > libcurl4-gnutls-dev | libcurl3-gnutls-dev), I see a problem here
> > > > with libdev package dependency. It should depend not on
> > > > libcurl4-gnutls-dev | lib
Dear Debian Developers (and other readers),
debimg will be a free alternative to debian-cd, written
in Python.
Attached are the file lenny.list, which is a "data file" (see comments in file),
and debimg.cfg which is the main configuration file.
Please tell me if you do not like one the listed th
[migrating to -curiosa]
Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, I think that hg is now the only VCS package which is not maintained in
> its
> own VCS format. (or are there other packages, too?)
$ apt-cache showsrc rcs | grep Vcs
Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=users/rfranc
Vincent Danjean wrote:
>
> mercurial in now imported in the PAPT repo:
> Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/python-apps/packages/mercurial/trunk
> Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/python-apps/packages/mercurial/trunk
Please add a / at the end (at least for VCS-Browser, which does not really work
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 23:48:21 +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> Although not very probably, until now Debian used to support static linking
> (libdev packages provide .a files, and depend on libdev packages that
> provide dependent .a files).
That's not true, afaik. If you're linking st
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:48:21PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > > While it is easy for build-dependency (just use libcurl4-gnutls-dev |
> > > libcurl3-gnutls-dev), I see a problem here with libdev package
> > > dependency. It should depend not on libcurl4-gnutls-dev |
> > > libcurl3-gnut
> > While it is easy for build-dependency (just use libcurl4-gnutls-dev |
> > libcurl3-gnutls-dev), I see a problem here with libdev package
> > dependency. It should depend not on libcurl4-gnutls-dev |
> > libcurl3-gnutls-dev, but on exact one that was actually used when
> > building package.
> >
On 24-Feb-08, 10:30 (CST), Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mercurial in now imported in the PAPT repo:
> Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/python-apps/packages/mercurial/trunk
Oh, the irony.
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operati
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:56:09PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> I maintain libetpan package, which build-depends on libcurl4-gnutls-dev.
> Resulting library package dependency is calculated using ${shlib:Depends},
> however libdev package dependency on libcurl4-gnutls-dev is manually
>
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:56:09PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> Hi
>
> I maintain libetpan package, which build-depends on libcurl4-gnutls-dev.
> Resulting library package dependency is calculated using ${shlib:Depends},
> however libdev package dependency on libcurl4-gnutls-dev is manua
Hi
I maintain libetpan package, which build-depends on libcurl4-gnutls-dev.
Resulting library package dependency is calculated using ${shlib:Depends},
however libdev package dependency on libcurl4-gnutls-dev is manually
written in debian/control file. The build package dependency is valuable
si
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 17:58 +, James Westby wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 10:19 -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > "Dirty history" is not only tolerated, but the *only* sane option with,
> > lesse... rcs cvs svn darcs tla baz (bzr?)
>
> bzr supports both ways of working, either cleaning up, or
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Preserving history is part of it, but not the objective. Sometimes you just
> have to plain clean up the mess, so as to be able to see anything of value
> through it.
As people ofthen do when using file based ChangeLog. People doesn't
put
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 02:15:10PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Note that also doesn't indicate how many were actually fixed. We have
> > nothing that look like bugzilla's NOTABUG or INVALID.
>
> It would be nice if we had this, actually, and it wouldn't
On lun, 2008-02-25 at 19:24 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Given that our admin is already a weasel and our browser is an ice
> weasel, it would only be logical to use this fluffy and beautiful
> animal
> as a mascot.
And (real) foxes are great!
--
Corsac
signature.asc
Description: This is a
hi,
I tried to send 2 messages but I guess they failed because of the
attached files (~ 6 mb)? so where can I put the drafts? citation below.
nic
> hi,
>
> here are 2 drafts attached. the debi-ant and the
> 'ameisenbaer' (ant-eater). look at
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:Anteater01.jp
2008/2/25, Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
> I have adopted package fortunes-debian-hints (#465936). The package
> contains various 'hints' regarding Debian system as name of package
> suggested.
>
> I therefore request to send 'hints' you encountered during your
> experience wi
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:07:20 +0200, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> We had a chicken[1]. We spent years actively getting rid of it.
> I loved the chicken. I had a character.
That would be the animal at:
http://lintian.debi
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On lun, 2008-02-25 at 10:23 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> ucf, from its DESCRIPTION in its man page, seems to handle the case of
>> shipping a configuration file upstream that may also be locally
>> modified, but I don't see where it handles merging i
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Mon February 25 2008 9:31:15 am Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Right. Well said.
> >
> > This however doesn't changes the value of logical changes. I doubt
> > git.git people would accept patches like:
> >
> > "Now it compiles again"
> > "Ouch! Syntax error
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 10:19 -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> "Dirty history" is not only tolerated, but the *only* sane option with,
> lesse... rcs cvs svn darcs tla baz (bzr?)
bzr supports both ways of working, either cleaning up, or preserving
the history as is.
It has rebase support through a p
I am logged in as root, and i try to su as a user : user1 ; I get the
following error:
rmachine:/home/user1/Maildir/cur# su user1
Cannot execute /bin/bash: Permission denied
On lun, 2008-02-25 at 10:23 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The problem is this: both krb5-kdc and krb5-admin-server have /etc/default
> files that control various aspects of the startup of the servers, such as
> whether a krb524d is run and what level of Kerberos v4 support is enabled
> in the KDC.
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le dimanche 24 février 2008 à 19:46 -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>> The ones that are overwritten completely that I'm aware of contain only
>> settings managed by debconf, or (as is the case for krb5-kdc and
>> krb5-admin-server) explicitly ask wheth
On lun, 2008-02-25 at 16:25 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> And why not a marmot ??
>
> It's a nice beautifull little animal, and, according to WP,
> "Marmots typically live in burrows, and hibernate there through the winter.
> Most marmots are highly social, and use loud whistles to communicate w
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 04:06:31PM +, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 25/02/2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > I'm planning to write a textual version of what I demonstrated at
> > FOSDEM, with some more ideas that I had talking with Julien Cristau
> > on the grass after.
>
> Please, pretty please
On ma, 2008-02-25 at 15:58 +0100, nic wrote:
> hi together,
>
> I'm not quite sure how to properly use this debian-list (I should have
> read before, I know...).
>
> I spontaneously thought of an ant: It works hard, it's tough, well, and
> with a fat grin on its face. just a first idea: the 'debi
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Dirty history" is not only tolerated, but the *only* sane option with,
> lesse... rcs cvs svn darcs tla baz (bzr?)
>
> Only the git and hg people seem to care (and the git people a lot more than
> hg people).
After you get used to get branches with p
Hi all,
I have adopted package fortunes-debian-hints (#465936). The package
contains various 'hints' regarding Debian system as name of package
suggested.
I therefore request to send 'hints' you encountered during your
experience with Debian till now which can be helpful to our users and
develope
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 02:15:10PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Note that also doesn't indicate how many were actually fixed. We have
> nothing that look like bugzilla's NOTABUG or INVALID.
It would be nice if we had this, actually, and it wouldn't be hard,
right? Just define a convention for a ne
On Mon February 25 2008 9:31:15 am Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Right. Well said.
>
> This however doesn't changes the value of logical changes. I doubt
> git.git people would accept patches like:
>
> "Now it compiles again"
> "Ouch! Syntax error"
> "First try to get it done"
> ...
>
> It's much nicer
On Sun February 24 2008 1:46:59 pm Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> I vote for clean history and a bissectable tree, and I think it is worth
> the effort. But I am no dpkg developer, this is a thing you guys have to
> find an agreement among yourselves.
See [1] for why this behavior stinks.
On 25/02/2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> I'm planning to write a textual version of what I demonstrated at
> FOSDEM, with some more ideas that I had talking with Julien Cristau
> on the grass after.
Please, pretty please, include graphics. Be it ASCII art-like
drawings, or gitk screenshots, with
Chip Norkus wrote:
> When installing Debian from the small net-install CD it shouldn't ask for
> the installation
> media by default in aptitude. This is small but kind of irritating when
> working on a fresh debian system in remotely.
This is already no longer the case if you use the Lenny insta
Le Monday 25 February 2008 15:58:16 nic, vous avez écrit :
> hi together,
>
> I'm not quite sure how to properly use this debian-list (I should have
> read before, I know...).
>
> I spontaneously thought of an ant: It works hard, it's tough, well, and
> with a fat grin on its face. just a first ide
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<...>
> And AFAICT, the kernel works in the very same way. What gets rebased
> though, are the bugfixes patches that come by 2 or 3, and that add no
> value when added as a specific branch. Usually those in git.git are
> applied on top of the 'maint' b
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 16:46 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> Yet, rebasing is still routinely performed in the Linux kernel
>> development.
>
> What I find interesting and rather amusing here is Linus talking
> negatively about rebase: in p
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance"):
>> However you haven't made it easy to merge your code... you repository is a
>> mess to proof-read and the cleaning work that you don't want to do has
>> thus to be done by Guillem.
>
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2/ Otavio was sort of acknowledging it as a good thing but a good thing
> that should be delayed for an unknown amount of time waiting for a fix on
> apt's side while the lack of fix didn't seem to create important problems
>
> Under those conditions,
hi together,
I'm not quite sure how to properly use this debian-list (I should have
read before, I know...).
I spontaneously thought of an ant: It works hard, it's tough, well, and
with a fat grin on its face. just a first idea: the 'debiant'. Just
playing with words. I tried some rough sketches,
"Miriam Ruiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2008/2/25, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, nic wrote:
>> > to cut the longway short: I'm iterested, but don't know how it works or
>> > how I could contribute.
>>
>> I don't know what needs to be explained... yo
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
sportman resistance like runners, swimmers, skiers, mountain bikers,
etc... Pytrainer works with your GPS fitness device and it is be able to
Ehm... using a better wording?
Hmm, I also care for content. Perhaps I'm to old fashioned but I c
2008/2/25, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, nic wrote:
> > to cut the longway short: I'm iterested, but don't know how it works or
> > how I could contribute.
>
> I don't know what needs to be explained... you don't need any special
> status to contribue a ma
Hi,
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, nic wrote:
> to cut the longway short: I'm iterested, but don't know how it works or
> how I could contribute.
I don't know what needs to be explained... you don't need any special
status to contribue a mascot, just find the idea, create the picture, send
it to us and wai
Am Montag, den 25.02.2008, 13:42 +0100 schrieb David Paleino:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:38:07 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
>
> > Am Montag, den 25.02.2008, 12:00 +0100 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Monday 25 February 2008 08:15, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 2
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:38:07 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Am Montag, den 25.02.2008, 12:00 +0100 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday 25 February 2008 08:15, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:07:20AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > > >We had a chicken[¹]
Am Montag, den 25.02.2008, 12:00 +0100 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 25 February 2008 08:15, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:07:20AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > >We had a chicken[¹]. We spent years actively getting rid of it.
> > >[¹] Technically sp
Hi,
On Monday 25 February 2008 08:15, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:07:20AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> >We had a chicken[¹]. We spent years actively getting rid of it.
> >[¹] Technically speaking it was a penguin. But it was a youthful
> >penguin, rebelling agains
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:40:31 +0100, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:33:48AM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> When it comes to specific patches of yours, I really believe that
> I really *don't*
>
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:33:48 +0100, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 03:37:07AM +, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:17:10 -0500, David Nusinow
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> > On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 06:08:17PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:35:13 +0100, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.02.25.0828
> +0100]:
>> I am not opposed to it. If you can somehow magically create a tool
>> that can linearize the feature branches, more power to you. I
>> per
Le dimanche 24 février 2008 à 19:46 -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> The ones that are overwritten completely that I'm aware of contain only
> settings managed by debconf, or (as is the case for krb5-kdc and
> krb5-admin-server) explicitly ask whether you want to manage the
> configuration file thro
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:33:48AM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> When it comes to specific patches of yours, I really believe that
I really *don't* believe
> topic branches like you advertise them are the best answer. Git makes
--
·O· Pierre H
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 03:37:07AM +, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:17:10 -0500, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 06:08:17PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > The problem is that you a
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 08:38:03AM +, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > I vote for clean history and a bissectable tree, and I think it is worth
> > > the
> > > effort. But I am no dpkg developer, this is a thing you guys have to find
> > > an agreemen
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:16:28 +0100
Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I would like to set up a Debian Marketing Team, whose work would
> be to organise all the promotional stuff (logos, t-shirt designs,
> wallpapers, etc.) so that the project can officially endorse good
> designs, and
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > I vote for clean history and a bissectable tree, and I think it is worth the
> > effort. But I am no dpkg developer, this is a thing you guys have to find
> > an agreement among yourselves.
>
> You vote for the mad route. Sorry, but it makes absol
also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.02.25.0828 +0100]:
> I am not opposed to it. If you can somehow magically create a
> tool that can linearize the feature branches, more power to you. I
> personally find the prospect highly unlikely; and I would like to see
> some co
Timothy G Abbott MIT.EDU> writes:
> Anders Kaseorg and I created a system of CDBS modules (which we've
> tentatively packaged as the config-package-dev package) for creating
> Debian configuration packages. By configuration packages, we mean
> packages that configure an existing Debian system
Hi,
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing
> debian/control Dependsfield??"):
> > I won't revert anything unless you come up with some proof that this
> > causes severe issues that will disturb the lenny release process.
>
82 matches
Mail list logo
