With this message I am unilaterally declaring myself a maintainer of
dpkg, and also declaring that Guillem is no longer a maintainer.
I have just made the hijack upload, dpkg 1.15.0, which contains
triggers support. You can find the specification in doc/ in the
source, or in
Hi list,
Just a question.
In Developer Locations page(*), it seems that Debian Developer is in
Antarctic Continent... awesome! Is it real??
*) http://www.debian.org/devel/developers.loc
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 10:14:14PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Hi list,
Just a question.
In Developer Locations page(*), it seems that Debian Developer is in
Antarctic Continent... awesome! Is it real??
Not that one; someone made a sign error with his coordinates.
--
To
On dim, mar 09, 2008 at 11:28:13 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
With this message I am unilaterally declaring myself a maintainer of
dpkg, and also declaring that Guillem is no longer a maintainer.
I have just made the hijack upload, dpkg 1.15.0, which contains
triggers support. You can find the
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 11:28:13AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
With this message I am unilaterally declaring myself a maintainer of
dpkg, and also declaring that Guillem is no longer a maintainer.
How can you possibly consider this justified, without even passing
through the TC? I find your
Dear QA,
Please remove the tkchooser package from Debian.
* First removal request in 2004:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/12/msg00018.html
* An important bug (#160136) is open for 5 years and 183 days.
* The Standards-Version is old (3.7.3 instead of 3.5.9.0)
* Upstream is abandoned
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 10:05:34AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 10:14:14PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
In Developer Locations page(*), it seems that Debian Developer is
in Antarctic Continent... awesome! Is it real??
Not that one; someone made a sign error with his
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 11:28:13AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
With this message I am unilaterally declaring myself a maintainer of
dpkg, and also declaring that Guillem is no longer a maintainer.
I find this unacceptable. This kind of situations are precisely those
in which people should resort
On dim, mar 09, 2008 at 11:28:13 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
REFERENCES, BACKGROUND and FURTHER DISCUSSION
[1] Guillem persistently reintroducing errors, wholesale
Here is an example of a big code change made by Guillem:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:50:16PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
AHAHAHAHAHA I totally missed that part in the first read. You're
totally on crack. Under C, NULL is defined as (void *)0
(and *NOT* (char *)0 that is TOTALLY wrong for obvious reasons), and
someone is not going to #define
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
With this message I am unilaterally declaring myself a maintainer of
dpkg, and also declaring that Guillem is no longer a maintainer.
For the record, Ian has been removed from the dpkg group on Alioth and
we asked for an UNACCEPT of his upload, but I'm
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:21:47PM +, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:50:16PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
AHAHAHAHAHA I totally missed that part in the first read. You're
totally on crack. Under C, NULL is defined as (void *)0
(and *NOT* (char *)0 that is TOTALLY
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 04:30:01PM +0100, Daniel van Eeden wrote:
Dear QA,
Please remove the tkchooser package from Debian.
The following page contains information on requesting a package removal:
http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
Regards,
--
Jonny Lamb, UK
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
[2] Reformatting changes
Guillem has been engaging in a programme of reformatting and restyling
of dpkg's code.
I agree that it's necessarily a good idea to reformat the code but you
^
not
brought up the
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 06:34:48PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:21:47PM +, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:50:16PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
AHAHAHAHAHA I totally missed that part in the first read. You're
totally on crack. Under C,
Ian Jackson wrote:
[4] Why not ask the Technical Committee to rule ?
The TC has not shown great dynamism in recent months. I have tried
quite hard as a TC member to get various questions that were put to
the TC decided, and the results have not been encouraging.
In any case, asking the TC
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 06:48:41PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
6.3.2.3 Pointers
[...]
3 An integer constant expression with the value 0, or
such an expression cast to type void *, is called a null
pointer constant.55) If a null pointer constant is assigned
to or
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 06:00:31PM +, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 06:48:41PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
6.3.2.3 Pointers
[...]
3 An integer constant expression with the value 0, or
such an expression cast to type void *, is called a null
pointer
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
Finally, of course, I am on the Technical Committee. For me to appeal
this dispute to it in this way would seem too much like me using it as
a personal bludgeon.
You could also appeal this dispute to it and not take part in the vote,
so that the TC's
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 06:34:48PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Here is the relevant C99 quote:
§ 7.17 Common definitions stddef.h
[...]
3 The macros are
NULL
which expands to an implementation-defined null pointer constant; and
0 is not a pointer, hence
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:50:16PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I fully support Guillem changes. C99 is almost 10 years old, we're
coding dpkg for Debian, in a sane C99/POSIX/X-OPEN/whatever
environment.
Hmm... Not really. GCC's default mode is still C89+GNU extensions. It
is true that the
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 07:09:39PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Well, I read it that way:
An integer constant expression with the value 0 (or such an
expression) cast to type void *, is called a null pointer constant.55)
Well, don't read it that way - the commas in the original version
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:13:14PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
So he's really in very-northern Finland/Sweden/Norway/Russia?
If I recall correctly, he was somewhere in or around Michigan.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 06:16:03PM +, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:50:16PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I fully support Guillem changes. C99 is almost 10 years old, we're
coding dpkg for Debian, in a sane C99/POSIX/X-OPEN/whatever
environment.
Hmm... Not
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 07:17:44PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 06:16:03PM +, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:50:16PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I fully support Guillem changes. C99 is almost 10 years old, we're
coding dpkg for Debian, in
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008, Clint Adams wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 10:14:14PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
In Developer Locations page(*), it seems that Debian Developer is in
Antarctic Continent... awesome! Is it real??
Not that one; someone made a sign error with his coordinates.
Can we
Pierre Habouzit writes (Re: dpkg semi-hijack - an announcement (also,
triggers)):
What a brilliant success for your new upload !
http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=dpkg
This was due to a buggy translation update (predating my efforts, but
not yet uploaded by anyone). It
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 02:17:04PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:13:14PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
So he's really in very-northern Finland/Sweden/Norway/Russia?
If I recall correctly, he was somewhere in or around Michigan.
Which really is not all that
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
With this message I am unilaterally declaring myself a maintainer of
dpkg, and also declaring that Guillem is no longer a maintainer.
For the record, Ian has been removed from the dpkg group on Alioth and
On Sun March 9 2008 12:27:59 Faidon Liambotis wrote:
I can't understand how a Debian Developer, let alone a Technical
Comittee member, can find it acceptable to hijack a package actively
maintained because of technical disagreements with its maintainer.
Especially if that package is a core
Raphael Hertzog writes (Re: dpkg semi-hijack - an announcement (also,
triggers)):
You can also read the log of #debian-dpkg since friday evening where I
spent two hours with him trying to find some compromise so that he can
contribute to dpkg. He just ignored everything we said and took this
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 19:27 +, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
You're hurting the credibility of the comittee and of the whole
project.
That's much more important than a disagreement on a technical matter.
On the other hand allowing dpkg to be maintained in the way that it
presently is, is
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 06:34:36PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Pierre Habouzit writes (Re: dpkg semi-hijack - an announcement (also,
triggers)):
If you're so afraid that one of the included headers defines NULL to
'0', then just assert (__builtin_types_compatible(NULL, void *))
somewhere
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 06:53:23PM +, Mike Bird wrote:
On Sun March 9 2008 12:27:59 Faidon Liambotis wrote:
I can't understand how a Debian Developer, let alone a Technical
Comittee member, can find it acceptable to hijack a package actively
maintained because of technical disagreements
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
Can you tell us in which situations we have #define NULL 0
as opposed to #define NULL (void*)0 ?
Some C libraries do this for the benefit of broken old programs which
use NULL when they mean an integer or character0. C99 says it's legal
for NULL to
Raphael Hertzog writes (Re: dpkg semi-hijack - an announcement (also,
triggers)):
The package got unaccepted by Anthony Towns.
OH FOR FUCK'S SAKE WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO GET SOMETHING DONE AROUND HERE?
SIX MONTHS THIS IMPORTANT CODE HAS JUST BEEN SITTING THERE
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Ian Jackson writes (Re: dpkg semi-hijack - an announcement (also, triggers)):
Raphael Hertzog writes (Re: dpkg semi-hijack - an announcement (also,
triggers)):
OH FOR FUCK'S SAKE WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO GET SOMETHING DONE AROUND HERE?
SIX MONTHS THIS IMPORTANT CODE HAS JUST BEEN SITTING THERE
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the jove package.
The package description is:
Jove is a compact, powerful Emacs-style text-editor. It provides the common
emacs keyboard bindings, together with a reasonable assortment of the most
popular advanced features
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the nn package.
The package description is:
The motto of nn is its expanded name, which is No News is good
news, but nn is better, and the nn newsreader is designed to let you
minimize the amount of time you spend reading
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the milter-greylist package.
The package description is:
milter-greylist is a stand-alone milter written in C that implements the
greylist filtering method, as proposed by Evan Harris.
.
Grey listing works by assuming that
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 11:28:13AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
[1] Guillem persistently reintroducing errors, wholesale
Here is an example of a big code change made by Guillem:
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commit;h=4e5846ccd3dcc33504aba8ef35a8962bccfd562e
However this is
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 20:38 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
And what is the problem exactly? The delay in patch integration?
A six month delay is unacceptable for code review. If it takes six
months, then new leadership is clearly required.
William
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Sun March 9 2008 13:44:08 Roger Leigh wrote:
I seriously can't believe that you hijacked this over a disagreement
about the definition/usage of NULL. Include stdlib.h and be done
with it already--it's not like this is a pressing or difficult problem
that warranted this action!
Roger,
On 09/03/2008, Mike Bird wrote:
Ian hijacked his own program back from the people who had been
blocking updates for six months - including the triggers enhancement
which is needed for boot time improvements
Is dpkg handling the boot sequence? Or are you confusing that with
dependency-based
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 13:19 -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
including the triggers enhancement which is
needed for boot time improvements and which should simplify some other
packaging issues.
I think you mean package install-time improvements, due to postponing
ldconfig until the end of the
William Pitcock a écrit :
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 13:19 -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
including the triggers enhancement which is
needed for boot time improvements and which should simplify some other
packaging issues.
I think you mean package install-time improvements, due to postponing
William Pitcock wrote:
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 20:38 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
And what is the problem exactly? The delay in patch integration?
If you'd look at submitting patches to dpkg from the perspective of any
recent patch submitter, I'd think that the problem would be clear.
--
see
William Pitcock wrote:
I think you mean package install-time improvements, due to postponing
ldconfig until the end of the installation. However, I am not sure how
useful this is because many maintainer scripts not generated by
debhelper call ldconfig locally.
Obviously the maintainer
On Sun March 9 2008 14:46:50 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
On 09/03/2008, Mike Bird wrote:
Ian hijacked his own program back from the people who had been
blocking updates for six months - including the triggers enhancement
which is needed for boot time improvements
Is dpkg handling the boot
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 11:05:11PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
* You need to be familiar with how the wide variety Debian packages
are maintained, patched and built. If you're not scared by
packages generating their patch series by applying sed statements
from cdbs include files
Dear readers,
The first release of debimg is available now: 0.0.1
Get the tarball: http://users.alioth.debian.org/~jak-guest/debimg_0.0.1.tar.gz
Clone git repo: git://git.debian.org/git/users/jak-guest/debimg.git
Browse the repo: http://git.debian.org/?p=users/jak-guest/debimg.git
This is the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Andres Klode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: debimg
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Julian Andres Klode
* URL : http://wiki.debian.org/debimg
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Python
Description :
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 02:17:04PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:13:14PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
So he's really in very-northern Finland/Sweden/Norway/Russia?
If I recall correctly, he was somewhere in or around Michigan.
Which really
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 02:17:15PM -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
On Sun March 9 2008 14:46:50 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Is dpkg handling the boot sequence? Or are you confusing that with
dependency-based initscripts?
I hope I'm not mis-stating Frans's position when I say that Frans
believes dpkg
Mike Bird [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ian hijacked his own program back from the people who had been blocking
updates for six months - including the triggers enhancement which is
needed for boot time improvements
dpkg triggers are nice to have, but they are not the reason why we
haven't
I'm going to have to agree with this; I admin m68k buildds; I had to
preinstall most of the texex packages simply because it was taking hours
(and that is not an exaggeration) to install them all, and then remove
them all again. A trigger based system would help relieve this problem. I
had a
Adam writes:
To put it in perspective, Michigan is at the same latitude as northern
half of Italy or even Spain.
Michigan extends from about 42N to about 48N: about from Rome to Munich.
Most of Canadians live south of the latitude of London, UK.
A fact which caused considerable consternation
On Sun March 9 2008 16:07:58 Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Mike Bird [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ian hijacked his own program back from the people who had been blocking
updates for six months - including the triggers enhancement which is
needed for boot time improvements
dpkg triggers are
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:21:19PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 02:17:04PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:13:14PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
So he's really in very-northern Finland/Sweden/Norway/Russia?
If I recall
[Not subscribed, Cc if you want me to see it.]
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 01:19:58PM -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
Ian hijacked his own program back from the people who had been blocking
updates for six months
So Ian Murdock would be perfectly entitled to kick out the DAM, DPL, TC,
DSA, and all others
Dear MIPS porters,
Despite the hard work you made for your buildds, the backlog is stil
stabilizing to a level that blocks into unstable the packages that
evolve at the periphery of the Debian galaxy, such as scientific
applications.
In order to help the people maintaining such packages to
On 10/03/2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
Dear MIPS porters,
Dear Charles,
Despite the hard work you made for your buildds, the backlog is stil
stabilizing to a level that blocks into unstable the packages that
evolve at the periphery of the Debian galaxy, such as scientific
applications.
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 07:52:28PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
With this message I am unilaterally declaring myself a maintainer of
dpkg, and also declaring that Guillem is no longer a maintainer.
For
[Not CCing -dpkg anymore, not relevant there]
Mike Bird [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Triggers are needed - a necessary condition, or at least a highly
desirable condition - for efficient installation of packages in order
to avoid unnecessary repetitive global reorderings of the initscript
On Sun March 9 2008 17:30:51 Daniel Stone wrote:
[Not subscribed, Cc if you want me to see it.]
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 01:19:58PM -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
Ian hijacked his own program back from the people who had been blocking
updates for six months
So Ian Murdock would be perfectly
On 2008-03-10, Mike Bird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it unlikely that the DAM, DPL, TC, and DSA would block useful
updates to Debian for six months
Welcome to real world.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Sun March 9 2008 18:40:25 Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Mike Bird [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In simple terms: dpkg triggers is a highly desirable precondition for
dependency-based initscripts, but so are several other preconditions,
not least of which is a substantial test period. The
Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 06:34:36PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Pierre Habouzit writes:
If you're so afraid that one of the included headers defines NULL to
'0', then just assert (__builtin_types_compatible(NULL, void *))
somewhere and be done with it.
On 09-Mar-08, 19:30 (CDT), Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was going to ask on which grounds exactly you were judging the dpkg
team's competence (and that of iwj's: have you reviewed the branch
yourself? can you confidently say that it's all fine?),
The problem is not the dpkg team
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 10:38:44PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 09-Mar-08, 19:30 (CDT), Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was going to ask on which grounds exactly you were judging the dpkg
team's competence (and that of iwj's: have you reviewed the branch
yourself? can you
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: flam3
Version: 2.7.9
Upstream author: Scott Draves spot draves org
URL: http://www.flam3.com/
License: GPLv2+
Description: Flam3, or Fractal Flames, are algorithmically generated images and
animations.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:26:28 -0400
Source: bobot++
Binary: bobot++
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.97-10.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James Vega
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:39:31 +0800
Source: ghostscript
Binary: ghostscript gs gs-esp gs-gpl gs-aladdin gs-common ghostscript-x
ghostscript-doc libgs8 libgs-dev
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 8.62.dfsg.1-1
Distribution: unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 07:30:19 +
Source: clamav-data
Binary: clamav-data
Architecture: source all
Version: 20080309.061900.6181
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marc Haber [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:13:27 +0100
Source: xml2rfc
Binary: xml2rfc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.33.dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Weimer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 08:36:42 +0100
Source: debram
Binary: debram debram-data
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.0.3-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thaddeus H. Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bart Martens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:33:42 +0100
Source: tcpquota
Binary: tcpquota
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.6.15-12.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:57:39 +0100
Source: libavg
Binary: python-libavg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.0-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Torsten Werner [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:07:28 +0100
Source: gcvs
Binary: gcvs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0final-16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:44:02 +0100
Source: kbd
Binary: kbd kbd-udeb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.12-19.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Console utilities maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marc 'HE'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:54:24 +0100
Source: pdbv
Binary: pdbv
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.11-0.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:02:13 +0100
Source: libnet-smtpauth-perl
Binary: libnet-smtpauth-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.08-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nacho Barrientos Arias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:22:12 +0100
Source: libclass-contract-perl
Binary: libclass-contract-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.14-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nacho Barrientos Arias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:54:55 +1100
Source: perl
Binary: perl-base libcgi-fast-perl perl-doc perl-modules perl-debug perl-suid
libperl5.10 libperl-dev perl
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 5.10.0-5
Distribution: experimental
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:17:14 +0100
Source: jack
Binary: jack
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.1.1+cvs20050801-23
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:16:13 +0100
Source: doc-linux-ja
Binary: doc-linux-ja-html doc-linux-ja-text
Architecture: source all
Version: 2006.05.25-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:25:32 +0100
Source: fruit
Binary: fruit
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.1.dfsg-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Oliver Korff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Oliver Korff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 23:40:37 +0100
Source: libsmbios
Binary: libsmbios1 libsmbios-dev libsmbios-bin libsmbios-doc libsmbiosxml1
libsmbiosxml-dev
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 0.13.13-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 16:11:23 +0100
Source: python2.5
Binary: python2.5 python2.5-minimal python2.5-examples python2.5-dev
idle-python2.5 python2.5-dbg
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.5.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:54:35 +0100
Source: uriparser
Binary: liburiparser1 liburiparser-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Xiph.org Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 20:41:08 +
Source: dpkg
Binary: dpkg dpkg-dev dselect
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.15.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dpkg Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ian Jackson [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:19:24 +0100
Source: idswakeup
Binary: idswakeup
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:53:44 +0100
Source: jasper
Binary: libjasper1 libjasper-dev libjasper-runtime
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.900.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:16:09 +
Source: avogadro
Binary: avogadro libavogadro0 libavogadro-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debichem Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:14:10 +
Source: earth3d
Binary: earth3d
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.5-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Luk Claes [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:26:40 +0100
Source: user-he
Binary: user-he
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.17-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Hebrew Packaging Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marc 'HE'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:21:16 +0200
Source: mpb
Binary: mpb mpb-mpi mpb-doc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.4.2-11.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Loïc Le Guyader [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Riku Voipio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 04:09:26 -0700
Source: samba
Binary: samba samba-common smbclient swat samba-doc samba-doc-pdf smbfs
libpam-smbpass libsmbclient libsmbclient-dev winbind samba-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 3.0.28-4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:10:14 +0100
Source: mailscanner
Binary: mailscanner
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.66.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Simon Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Simon Walter [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:43:16 +
Source: fgfs-atlas
Binary: fgfs-atlas
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.0-5.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Ove Kaaven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Luk Claes [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
