On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:39:10AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 12-Mar-08, 04:21 (CDT), Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yay for portability: many compilers don't support forward static prototypes
> > properly. And then we hear about using (char *)0 instead of NULL for
> > port
Was this intended for me? If so, I'm not clear why...
Robert.
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Tille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 3:16 PM
To: Debian Developers
Cc: Aaron Darling; Robert C. Edgar Bob; Todd J Treangen
Subject: Re: Packaging Mauve and libClustalW
[Robert and Todd please read below about some issues about muscle]
Everybody: PLease keep the debian-med mailing list in CC. We would like
to build reasonable Debian packages out of a uniform source that contains
all features that are needed and as less bugs as possible. The Debian-Med
mailing l
* John Goerzen:
> What is it that people don't get from git-rebase(1)?
>
>When you rebase a branch, you are changing its history in a way that
>will cause problems for anyone who already has a copy of the branch in
>their repository and tries to pull updates from you. You s
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 11:16 -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> Ian appears to have chosen to speak truth to power rather than
> forking. Do you have a constructive alternative to suggest?
$ echo ":/dpkg/i" >> ~/.killfile
William
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed March 12 2008 10:26:52 Luk Claes wrote:
> Ian Jackson wrote:
> > It would be flogging a dead horse if we didn't have the core packaging
> > software maintained by an obstructive and naive programmer supported
> > by someone who is more interested in pretty revision logs than good
> > code.
>
On 12 Mar 2008, at 8:15 am, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 04:28:31PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
Just thought you might like to read that as a break from the flame
wars.
Thanks, this kind of interruptions have indeed chance of breaking
flamewars :-)
However, you might be in
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 08:35:28AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:33:12 +0200, Andrei Popescu
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 03:51:14PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
> >> I uploaded ELinks 0.12~20080127-2 a few days ago to experimental. If
> >> you
Ian Jackson wrote:
> William Pitcock writes ("Re: dpkg semi-hijack - an announcement (also,
> triggers)"):
>> On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 22:06 -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
>>> It's easy to see negatives such as making it harder to merge
>>> long-awaited features. What positives do you see for Debian?
>> Th
On 12-Mar-08, 04:21 (CDT), Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yay for portability: many compilers don't support forward static prototypes
> properly. And then we hear about using (char *)0 instead of NULL for
> portability reasons,
As has been explained, the problem is not replacing "0"
On Mon 10 Mar 2008, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11320 March 1977, José "L. Redrejo" Rodríguez wrote:
>
> > Description : Free fonts for education and institutions
> Please keep the "free" out of the description(s). Thats already pretty
> clear thanks to the archive it should be uploaded to.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: libnet-nis-perl
Version: 0.43
Upstream Author: Rik Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ed Santiago Muñoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL:
On Tue March 11 2008 10:45:43 pm Guillem Jover wrote:
> Anyway, after the freeze was announced it was clear that Ian was not
> going to fix the branch, and because having this feature for lenny is
> highly desirable I was just going to have to fix it myself and review
> during that process, but got
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 01:19:58PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> And most importantly, you wouldn't contemplate deploying somewhere else an
> implementation of triggers that hasn't been accepted in dpkg, because of the
> danger of creating (and maintaining) a sustained incompatibility.
Oh wait,
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:01:35AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 14:42:48 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > Against the wishes of, afaict, Guillem and Raphael, Ian's made applying
> > > his triggers patch dependent on:
> > >
> > > - reversion to two space indenting
>
> The
Hi all!
> I've been talking with the maintainer[1] of xchat-xsys[2] for several
> bugs and many new upstream releases hold back on Debian, and he
> communicated me that he is not longer interested on maintaining it any
> more.
> Unfortunately, my suggestion of orphaning the pkg made no differ
Hi Martin,
* Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-12 11:52]:
> On Wed Mar 12, 2008 at 11:39:10 +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> > Does anybody know where Steffen Joeris is?
> >
> > He has not answered my mails for a month+ already.
> > Is everything OK with him?
>
> IIRC: Broken la
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
The history of this change is as follows:
* At some point, without any kind of discussion, Guillem
unilaterally reformats several files to 8-character indents.
...
Well, I don't want to interrupt your guys thrilling discussion
about indentation of so
On Wed March 12 2008 02:21:24 Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=122fdc0fa5fe90a7d5f6919f2d3177fd0830c360
>
> Code has been refactored in a generic module to deal with usages and
> so on. The functions aren't static anymore, because they *do* have a
>
On Wednesday 12 March 2008 09:39:10 Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Does anybody know where Steffen Joeris is?
>
> He has not answered my mails for a month+ already.
> Is everything OK with him?
Yes, his laptop is broken and he doesn't yet know when he will get it back.
Furthermore he can't access in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Source package: nxproxy
Binary package(s): nxproxy
Version: 3.1.0-2-1
Licence: GPL
Author: NoMachine
Homepage:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Source package: nxcomp
Binary package(s): libxcomp3 libxcomp-dev
Version: 3.1.0-6-1
Licence: GPL
Author: NoMachine
Ho
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Source package: nxcl
Binary package(s): libnxcl1 libnxcl-dev libnxcl-bin
Version: 0.9-1
Licence: GPL
Author: Seb James [EMAIL PRO
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Source package: qtnx
Binary package(s): qtnx
Version: 0.9-1
Licence: GPL
Author:
Homepage:
Description: NX cli
Le mercredi 12 mars 2008 à 10:01 +, Ian Jackson a écrit :
> Guillem Jover writes ("Re: dpkg semi-hijack - an announcement (also,
> triggers)"):
> > I'd like to clarify few more things, which have been brough up the past
> > few days. Even if I don't usually accept open invitations to flamefest
Hi,
On Wed Mar 12, 2008 at 11:39:10 +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Does anybody know where Steffen Joeris is?
>
> He has not answered my mails for a month+ already.
> Is everything OK with him?
IIRC: Broken laptop and no Internet connection somewhere in .au.
Last time a had active smoke s
Guillem Jover writes ("Re: dpkg semi-hijack - an announcement (also,
triggers)"):
> I'd like to clarify few more things, which have been brough up the past
> few days. Even if I don't usually accept open invitations to flamefests
> (re the OP).
Guillem emerges! At last!
The key claim Guillem m
> Maybe he could answer if you try and contact white@, rather than [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
Upss.. :)
sorry the typo was only in subject.
I send my mails to him with the command 'Reply' so there' s no typos
there. :)
> Anyway, he gave away some of his packages, because of his being busy,
> which might
William Pitcock writes ("Re: dpkg semi-hijack - an announcement (also,
triggers)"):
> On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 22:06 -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> > It's easy to see negatives such as making it harder to merge
> > long-awaited features. What positives do you see for Debian?
>
> The horse is dead. Stop
On 12/03/2008, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Does anybody know where Steffen Joeris is?
>
> He has not answered my mails for a month+ already.
> Is everything OK with him?
Maybe he could answer if you try and contact white@, rather than [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Anyway, he gave away some of his packages
Hi all,
I'd like to know the situation of fonts for MathML.
As far as I know, to display MathML it need some TeX fonts,
Symbol fonts, and fonts of Mathematica4.1 and of MathType.
(cf. http://www.mozilla.org/projects/mathml/fonts/)
Mathematica and MathType are, of course, commercial applications
On mar, mar 11, 2008 at 09:41:57 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> [2] His most recent commit is 402 diff lines of stuff like this:
> -static void usage(void) {
> +void
> +usage(void)
> +{
You know what you're doing is FUD from the worst kind ?
On mar, mar 11, 2008 at 11:37:22 +, John Go
Does anybody know where Steffen Joeris is?
He has not answered my mails for a month+ already.
Is everything OK with him?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libclass-dbi-sweet-perl
Version : 0.09
Upstream Author : many :)
MAINTAINERS
Fred Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
AUTHORS
Christian Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ma
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 04:28:31PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
> Just thought you might like to read that as a break from the flame wars.
Thanks, this kind of interruptions have indeed chance of breaking
flamewars :-)
However, you might be interested in http://times.debian.net, it is an
"advertisem
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:33:12 +0200, Andrei Popescu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 03:51:14PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
>> I uploaded ELinks 0.12~20080127-2 a few days ago to experimental. If
>> you happen to use ELinks, please test this and report any bugs etc. that
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:19:01PM -0200, UlisesVitulli wrote:
> I've been talking with the maintainer[1] of xchat-xsys[2] (...)
> Unfortunately, my suggestion of orphaning the pkg made no difference
> to the current maintainer, as he showed no cares at all for it.
If he showed no care at all for
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 22:19 -0200, UlisesVitulli wrote:
> I've been talking with the maintainer[1] of xchat-xsys[2] for several
> bugs and many new upstream releases hold back on Debian, and he
> communicated me that he is not longer interested on maintaining it any
> more.
Tell him to orphan
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Or use the aptitude frontend for package management which will show such
> packages under the header "Obsolete and Locally Created Packages".
Thanks for reminding this very obvious feature which helped me
removing about 20 obsolete packages from my laptop
Karl Chen wrote:
> Good points, I also discovered Synaptic works well for manually
> looking for removed packages. Notifying PTS subscribers by email
> also sounds very useful. Still, I worry about the people who
> don't know to check for removed packages - and aren't watching
> the packages that
On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 22:19 -0200, UlisesVitulli wrote:
> Hi debian-devel,
>
> I've been talking with the maintainer[1] of xchat-xsys[2]
Private conversation ?
> for several
> bugs
I don't see "several bugs".
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=xchat-xsys
> and many new upstream
[sent to -devel for a wider audience]
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 11:54 +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
> [Please CC me in all replies, or reply only to me]
>
> We've had bits from the DPL[1][2], bits from the release team[3], bits
> from the listmasters[4] and bits from other people and groups within
> Debia
42 matches
Mail list logo
