Re: Using apt-file db to find possible conflicts

Hi, On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:16:39PM -0400, Matthew Rosewarne wrote: > On Thursday 20 March 2008, Sami Liedes wrote: > > I don't know if there's any previous work on this, but since I as a > > sid user often see conflicts in packages, and I've seen those on > > numerous oldstable->stable upgrade

Re: [DSE-Dev] New version of refpolicy headed towards incoming

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:51:17 +0100, Václav Ovsík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Maybe we should test the policy first even without packaging. Changes > can be pushed upstream before packaging the latest reference policy. Well, the policy in Sid is now the SVN HEAD/ > Latest refpolicy is al

Re: source:Version and ancient dpkg-dev

On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:12:44 +0900, "Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm curious why you are using sarge? Any particular reason or just intertia? > Just inertia; I forgot to buy etch DVDs. (I don't have enough bandwidth to do apt-get upgrade without DVDs.) -- Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: source:Version and ancient dpkg-dev

On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:26:31 +0100, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We do our best to support partial upgrades, but supporting compilation > of (testing/unstable) packages on machines which are running a partially > upgraded olstable is not something we target. > I read the policy aga

Re: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] I am confused about configuration files

Le Thursday 20 March 2008 18:58:00 Artur R. Czechowski, vous avez écrit : > So what should be the proper way to allow switching between ATI and Debian > debs with drivers? The packages are never to be compatible or upgradable. To be more clear, we should even renamed them at some point. The prope

Bug#471954: ITP: lxde -- Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andrew Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: lxde Version : 0.2.10 Upstream Author : Hong Jen Yee (PCMan) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://lxde.sourceforge.net * License : (GPL) Programming Lang: (C) Description

Candidatura rete agenti | Life - Bellaria

Documento senza titolo LIFE. comunicazione / commercializzazione / risor= se umane e-mail inf= [EMAIL PROTECTED] . website www.gruppolife.net Egregi signori, siamo la direzione Commerciale dell'azienda = LIFE che ha sede in Romagna e opera nel settore de

Re: [DSE-Dev] Debian refpolicy and core SELinux package update

Hi, On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:01:40PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > > As of this writing, all the core SELinux packages in Debian have > been updated to the latest release earlier this month; and thus are > fairly up to date. > > I have also merged SVN HEAD of refpoli

Bug#471965: ITP: mozilla-webmailnotifier -- WebMail Notifier checks your webmail accounts and notifies unread emails

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Philippe Coval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: mozilla-webmailnotifier Version : 1.0.9 Upstream Author : Byungwook Kang * URL : http://webmailnotifier.mozdev.org * License : MPL 1.1/GPL 2

Re: Using apt-file db to find possible conflicts

From: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Using apt-file db to find possible conflicts Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:27:31 +0100 > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:16:39PM -0400, Matthew Rosewarne wrote: > > On Thursday 20 March 2008, Sami Liedes wrote: > > > I don't know if there's any p

Re: Using apt-file db to find possible conflicts

> Hi, > > I don't know if there's any previous work on this, but since I as a > sid user often see conflicts in packages, and I've seen those on > numerous oldstable->stable upgrades, I thought something could be done > about it. Actually, most often oldstable->stable updates seem to me to > have

.desktop files for x-www-browser and x-terminal-emulator

Hello, It has been brought to my attention that we don't have .desktop files to launch what is the standard Debian way to launch web browsers and terminal emulators: how come? Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digit

Re: Using apt-file db to find possible conflicts

Would the collab-qa or devscripts teams be interested in working on and/or hosting this tool? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Bug#471954: ITP: lxde -- Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 06:32:10PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote: [...] > - Fast, rund well even on older machines produced in 1999 [...] > - Suitable for old machines(old Pentium II CPU is enough). Maybe you could merge those two lines? Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you do

Re: .desktop files for x-www-browser and x-terminal-emulator

#include * Enrico Zini [Fri, Mar 21 2008, 10:21:53PM]: > Hello, > > It has been brought to my attention that we don't have .desktop files > to launch what is the standard Debian way to launch web browsers and > terminal emulators: how come? Good question. A while ago I was looking for a reliably

Re: Using apt-file db to find possible conflicts

* Sami Liedes [Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:34:36 +0200]: > I don't know if there's any previous work on this, There is . I don't know how it compares to your code. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.e

Re: Version numbering for security uploads of native packages

On 2008-03-16, Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 03:47 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: >> The current binNMU numbering scheme was selected explicitly to allow >> security uploads to sort later by numbering as >> +; e.g., 1.2-5.1+etch1. > > That makes sense, although do

SELinux overhead

Is there available data about the overhead of enforcing various SELinux policies? Quantitatively, Pierre -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Architecture not in legend in %-built graphs on buildd.d.o

Hi list, I'm not sure where to send this comment, so I guess debian-devel will have to do. The per-architecture "percent built" graphs at http://buildd.debian.org/stats/ -- for instance, see http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph-week-big.png -- show 13 arches on the plot but only 12 in the legend.

Re: [DSE-Dev] Debian refpolicy and core SELinux package update

Hi, On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:52:53 +0100, Václav Ovsík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I have already some open threads over [EMAIL PROTECTED] I hope > they will continue to some final state. Maybe the discussion about > SELinux problems can be managed on > [EMAIL PROTECTED] now. I'm going to post

Re: Using apt-file db to find possible conflicts

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 09:11:05AM -0500, Andrew Dougherty wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I don't know if there's any previous work on this, but since I as a > > sid user often see conflicts in packages, and I've seen those on > > numerous oldstable->stable upgrades, I thought something could be done > >

Re: .desktop files for x-www-browser and x-terminal-emulator

Hello! On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:14:49 +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include > * Enrico Zini [Fri, Mar 21 2008, 10:21:53PM]: >> It has been brought to my attention that we don't have .desktop files >> to launch what is the standard Debian way to launch web browsers and >> terminal emulators: how com

Re: Installation of suggested packages: recursive or not?

Le Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 08:13:30AM -0700, Daniel Burrows a écrit : > > BTW, aptitude already supports non-recursively installing Suggests, and > flagging them as manual at the same time: "~Rsuggests:^package$" will > install everything that's directly suggested by "package". Dear Daniel, Thank

Re: SELinux overhead

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 07:48:40PM +0100, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > Is there available data about the overhead of enforcing various SELinux > policies? > > Quantitatively, > Pierre Is this in comparison to 'having SELinux support' which is what I understand was the case for Etch. -k -- | .''`. ==

Re: SELinux overhead

On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:48:40 +0100, Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Is there available data about the overhead of enforcing various > SELinux policies? I do not have data, no, But I recall a talk at the SELinux symposium a couple of years ago which pegged the overhead of a