(usual dilemna: who to put in answer to an ITP...using the bug number
and -devel to avoid too many CC)
Quoting Cyril Brulebois ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On 02/04/2008, Joost van Baal wrote:
> > In this package you will find the Debian GNU/Linux FAQ, which gives
> > frequently asked questions (with
On Wed, April 2, 2008 22:13, John Goerzen wrote:
> I've been very happy that the Etch installer supports dm-crypt out of the
> box. This is a wonderfully nice feature.
>
> Here's my gripe: it gets in the way of unattended boots.
...
> So I haven't submitted a bug anywhere because I don't know wher
Hi Bart,
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 20:43 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 17:46 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wro
Hi,
On Thursday 03 April 2008 07:19, Anibal Avelar wrote:
> Totally I agree. Testing is fine for a personal Desktop machine.
I disagree.
It's fine for some persons desktops, yes.
But it is neither "feature"-supported nor security supported, if users have
problems they'll get "use stable if y
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But it is ... nor security supported
Correction, it is supported by the testing security team, and rather well IMO.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 09:57:31 +0100
Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 03 April 2008 07:19, Anibal Avelar wrote:
> > Totally I agree. Testing is fine for a personal Desktop machine.
>
> I disagree.
>
> It's fine for some persons desktops, yes.
>
> But it is neither
On Thu Apr 03 11:54, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> And stable is not fine for a desktop in general, because it has outdated
> packages which are not what a desktop user wants.
_you_ may want more up to date packages, but a lot of people are
entirely happy with etch on their desktop. For example, both
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: snmpmon
Version: 0.5
Upstream Author: Christof Musik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL: http://snmpmon.sourceforge.net/
License: GPL v2
Programming Lang: C++
Description: Qt
[Holger Levsen]
> But it is neither "feature"-supported nor security supported,
The testing security team is actually doing a very good job at
supporting testing, so this is not completely accurate.
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
On Wed, 02 Apr 2008, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > The document is supplied in HTML, PDF, PostScript and plain ascii.
>^ ASCII?
No, _plain text_. ASCII is just an encoding.
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Il giorno gio, 03/04/2008 alle 01.58 +0200, Loic Dachary ha scritto:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: jaxer
> Version : 0.9.6
> Upstream Author : Aptana
> * URL or Web page : http://www.aptana.com/jaxer/download
> * License : GPL
> Description
> Upstream Author : Benedikt Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Benedikt Meurer is an Xfce developper. If this is/will be part of Xfce, you
may want to talk with pkg-xfce maintainers about this and see it may be
suitable for the pkg-xfce repository.
(that said with my pkg-xfce hat)
--
Yves-Alexis
--
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 15:16 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 00:38:36 -0300
> Joel Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think that the testing or above releases may be suitable for the
> > desktop of a EXPERT linux user. I need a stable release because my
> > desktop must
On Thu April 3 2008 03:03:51 Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Thu Apr 03 11:54, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > And stable is not fine for a desktop in general, because it has outdated
> > packages which are not what a desktop user wants.
>
> _you_ may want more up to date packages, but a lot of people are
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 11:03:51AM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> _you_ may want more up to date packages, but a lot of people are
> entirely happy with etch on their desktop. For example, both me and my
> mother.
>
> I'd also go as far to say that most corporate Linux desktops, to pick
> another
On mer, 2008-04-02 at 21:07 -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
> How expensive is running gtk-update-ican-cache? I mean, it would be easy
> enough to have a script run
> that runs "gtk-update-icon-cache /usr/share/icons/$subdir" for each of the
> subdirectories. Then the /usr/share/icons
> trigger would jus
Package: wnpp
Owner: Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
Package name: sn
Version : 0.3.8-8
Upstream Author : Patrik Rådman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
License : GPL2
Description : Small NNTP server for leaf sites
I am still using sn for locally storing n
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 10:55:40AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> I run unstable on my home machines, and stable on my work machines. At
> work I am trying to get things done, not play with my software. At home
> is different. I don't need to spend 4 hours figuring out why X no
> longer works
Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> as upstream is considering some changes in the upgrade path that will
> make upgrading with pure sql files quiet hard and they never really
> supported upgrading through pure sql files (and therefore dbconfig-common)
> I could need someone to help w
Josselin Mouette writes ("Re: triggers wishlist"):
> On mer, 2008-04-02 at 21:07 -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
> > How expensive is running gtk-update-ican-cache? I mean, it would be easy
> > enough to have a script run
> > that runs "gtk-update-icon-cache /usr/share/icons/$subdir" for each of the
> >
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 04:13:19PM +0100, Dave Holland wrote:
> Strange; I run stable at home, because if I spent 4 hours figuring out
> why X no longer works, my wife would kill me (a) for breaking X, and (b)
> for wasting 4 hours. ;-)
My wife would only be upset if I messed with her machine, or
On Thu April 3 2008 9:55:40 am Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 11:03:51AM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> > _you_ may want more up to date packages, but a lot of people are
> > entirely happy with etch on their desktop. For example, both me and my
> > mother.
> >
> > I'd also go a
On Thu April 3 2008 9:17:54 am Mike Bird wrote:
> On Thu April 3 2008 03:03:51 Matthew Johnson wrote:
> > On Thu Apr 03 11:54, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > And stable is not fine for a desktop in general, because it has
> > > outdated packages which are not what a desktop user wants.
> >
> > _you_
On 2008-04-03, Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu April 3 2008 03:03:51 Matthew Johnson wrote:
>> On Thu Apr 03 11:54, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
>> > And stable is not fine for a desktop in general, because it has outdated
>> > packages which are not what a desktop user wants.
>>
>> _you_
On 2008-04-03, Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> as upstream is considering some changes in the upgrade path that will
>> make upgrading with pure sql files quiet hard and they never really
>> supported upgrading through pure sql files (an
On Thu April 3 2008 14:38:14 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On 2008-04-03, Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Stable is a poor solution for desktops because it doesn't support
> > recent hardware. For a long time now we've had to run Testing
> > mixed with the Unstable versions of xserver-xorg.
Your message dated Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:55:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#453954: general: Lenny release goal: UTF-8
debian/changelog and debian/control
has caused the Debian Bug report #453954,
regarding general: Lenny release goal: UTF-8 debian/changelog and
Le Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 10:55:40AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen a écrit :
>
> Given how much uproar there is about Microsoft's desire to retire
> Windows XP while many people would rather stick with it that go to
> Vista, perhaps the idea that everyone wants the latest and greatest is
> no longer true.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unblock 438885 by 341413
Bug number 341413 not found. (Is it archived?)
Unknown blocking bug/s: 341413.
Bug#438885: Mass bug filing: must use invoke-rc.d
Was blocked by: 341413 341415 348259 348263 367722 367725 367729 367730 367731
367732 367733 3677
Your message dated Fri, 4 Apr 2008 01:17:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#412940: general: every other OS can receive an HTTP
response, but not etch
has caused the Debian Bug report #412940,
regarding general: every other OS can receive an HTTP response, but n
Your message dated Fri, 4 Apr 2008 01:21:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#202888: unstable x86 rrdtool installation segfault
has caused the Debian Bug report #202888,
regarding unstable x86 rrdtool installation segfault
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Fri, 4 Apr 2008 01:23:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#268709: Architecture names should have a "${kernel}-"
prefix
has caused the Debian Bug report #268709,
regarding Architecture names should have a "${kernel}-" prefix
to be marked as done
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
> reassign 448274 kde
Bug#448274: general: Create a meta package named debian-kde-desktop
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `kde'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 419 (new: 12)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 101 (new: 3)
Total number of packages reques
34 matches
Mail list logo
