Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 08:40 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Lots of other packages do this -- one of mine off the top of my head is
>> xml-security-c.
> Nope. No mention of aclocal.m4 in debian/rules for that package,
> just /usr/share/misc/config.guess a
On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 08:40 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 13:19 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> >> If you run autotools at build time you should also ensure that the
> >> changes which autotools makes are reverted in the clean target.
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 04:07:55PM +0200, Patrik Fimml wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the latest eboard package in unstable is version 1.0.3-1. It is rather
> unusable, because it keeps crashing frequently (#452686). Meanwhile, upstream
> has moved on to version 1.1.1, released three months ago.
>
> I have tri
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think everyone involved did a wonderful job, especially given the
> appalling constraints they were under. There is a difference, though,
> between acknowledging the excellent work that was done and burying one's
> head i
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 01:45:25AM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Am Di den 27. Mai 2008 um 1:09 schrieb Colin Watson:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 09:15:57AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> > > The rollout of information and updates was appalling - even adding in
> > > the material from Ubuntu the informa
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 05:49:59PM +0200, Patrik Fimml wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 04:51:36PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > Well, I actually had false positives (on amd64) -- even freshly
> > > generated keys with the new libopenssl package were reported as bad,
> > > which irritated me a
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 03:53:48PM +0100, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2008, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> > It's not convenient to download 20M only for viewing a changelog -
> > i want look at changelog to decide, should i upgrade this package or
> > no.
>
> In general you will be able
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> With current kernels, if you use /dev/input/mice, the port can be shared
> by gpm and X at the same time, and all mice you connect (no matter what)
> show up in that device. Of course PS/2 mice can not be connected while
> the system is on, since the hardware simply is no
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 12:57:11PM -0700, Stephen Powell wrote:
> Per the suggestion of J?r?my Bobbio when he closed Bug
> # 481514 against installation-reports, I am posting
> this item to the debian-devel mailing list.
>
> The Debian installer needs some improvement when it
> comes to mouse conf
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> FYI, the most recent CVS snapshots of GDB can read zlib-compressed
> debug info. If someone gets around to an objcopy patch to create it,
> then we can change debhelper to use it...
>
What's the runtime cost?
Usually things get slower with such kind of changes.
Che
* Joerg Jaspert:
> Any comments?
In the long term, I'd like to see a better CDN, so that such
considerations would magically disappear.
> Timeframe for this? I expect it to be ready within 2 weeks.
Oooh. For a production-quality CDN, 2 years seem more reasonable.
I don't know the reason for t
Per the suggestion of Jérémy Bobbio when he closed Bug
# 481514 against installation-reports, I am posting
this item to the debian-devel mailing list.
The Debian installer needs some improvement when it
comes to mouse configuration. Currently, if the user
requests a "standard system" and a "deskt
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Patrik Fimml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: eboard-extras-pack2
Version : 1
Upstream Author : Felipe Bergo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.bergo.eng.br/eboard/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: N/A (only imag
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 02:05:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 05:52:13PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
> > I demand that Alexander E. Patrakov may or may not have written...
> >
> > > Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > >> That already has a problem: How to define "large"? One way,
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 05:52:13PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Alexander E. Patrakov may or may not have written...
>
> > Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> >> That already has a problem: How to define "large"? One way, which we
> >> chose for now, is simply "everything > 50MB".
>
> > Random th
* Florian Weimer:
> Well, you can send me the key in private if you want. Let's see if I
> can factor it. 8-)
I got the key from Patrik, but it's not contained in my blacklist. We
couldn't find a dowkd version that flagged the key as weak, nor could we
definitely confirm that the very same key
16 matches
Mail list logo
