to, 2008-07-03 kello 08:39 +0200, Johannes Wiedersich kirjoitti:
> What is the proper way to get the s_p_a_m removed from the bts and to
> reopen the bug? To contact the 'sender' of the spam mail as suggested by
> the bts seems absurd.
For removing the spam, see the link near the bottom of the bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all!
One of my bug reports appears to have been closed by a s_p_a_m mail:
> #325588: kile crashes on auto-save, incurring data loss
>
> It has been closed by "Theron Landers"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (reply to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>
> Their expl
to, 2008-07-03 kello 08:24 +0200, Andreas Tille kirjoitti:
> /me as a completely uneducated apt / aptitude user thinks: Triggers have
> done more harm than good.
I haven't been following trigger adoption very much, so I'm ignorant:
what harm have triggers done?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
#473461
But this bug ends with a question:
What do you think?
/me as a completely uneducated apt / aptitude user thinks: Triggers have
done more harm than good. Please consider this as a stupid users opinion
but I would not mention this "feature" as
Decklin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wrote this ages ago, and in the meantime another package was
> renamed to "mnemosyne", so in the tradition of epiphany-browser (and
> sup-mail, which I am presently packaging) I'm going with
> "mnemosyne-blog" and renaming things out of the way approp
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Decklin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mnemosyne-blog
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Decklin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.red-bean.com/~decklin/mnemosyne/
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: P
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Marvin Renich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080701 20:45]:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> >> I mean the pending-write case is the most obvious. But what about resolver
>> >> caches, VPNs and the like?
>> >
>> > W
Tilo Schwarz wrote:
> Actually, as "Joe User" (me ;-) I'm wondering, why I get during an update
> of let's say 20 packages the triggers message for man-db and menu not
> once at the end, but several times every few packages. I thought, the
> idea is, to let the triggers to the work once during o
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:27:55 +0200, Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[...]
From a "Joe User" perspective, I think delay rather misses the point.
The
reason for triggers is not to do stuff later, it's to consolidate
processing
so actions don't need to be done multiple times.
A
"Marvin Renich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080701 20:45]:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> I mean the pending-write case is the most obvious. But what about
>> resolver
>> caches, VPNs and the like?
>
> What
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 00:13:06 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
> The real issue is not that you were posting without disclaimers. The real
> issue is that you post to debian-legal with *content* that is inappropriate
> *because* you are not a lawyer or a Debian developer.
>
> When someone posts t
* Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080701 20:45]:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >> I mean the pending-write case is the most obvious. But what about resolver
> >> caches, VPNs and the like?
> >
> > What kind of data loss do you expect to arise from shutting down a VPN
> > clien
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:34:31PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The real issue is not that you [Francesco Poli] were posting without
> > disclaimers.
> The issue that led to those disclaimers was *exactly* that some
> thought Francesco should make it c
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Angel Abad (Ikusnet SLL)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libdata-report-perl
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-Report/
* License : (GPL, Arti
Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > [debian-legal] does not restrict itself to dispensing the
> > decisions of the ftp-masters.
>
> Perhaps that should be fixed then.
What would your proposed fix entail? Surely not divorcing the
ftp-mas
Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Your [Steve Langasek's] complaint, on the other hand, is just as valid
> or invalid whether Francesco is a Debian developer or not. However,
> the description of the list says:
>
> debian-legal mailing list
> Copyright, licensing and patent issues
>
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The real issue is not that you [Francesco Poli] were posting without
> disclaimers.
The issue that led to those disclaimers was *exactly* that some
thought Francesco should make it clear he is not speaking officially.
> When someone posts to debian-le
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 07:34:22PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > As a consequence I began adding the disclaimers to my messages, in
> > order to explicitly remind readers about the above facts.
>
> > Now, you say that those disclaimers are a waste of
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 07:34:22PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:16:28 +0200 Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> I *used* to think that those disclaimers are implicit in most cases.
> But then, I was harshly accused of not making it clear enough that
> I am neither a lawyer, nor a Debi
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Please explain why these third parties are doing something so braindead as
> to rely on the VPN connection only ever disappearing gracefully.
I am not talking about the third party, it could be an internal VPN, and yes
it is braindead, welcome to the rea
20 matches
Mail list logo
