Hello,
I didn't get a response to the enclosed mail which was sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there some reason why a package
will not be Installed even after a build succeeds?
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> I uploaded ffmpeg2theora 0.21-0.1 to the archive on Jun 28th.
> It was b
Drake Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoth Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 2008-07-19 00:44:04 +1200:
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 08:23:27PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> > > Description : text viewer, mainly used for reading text originally
> > > novels
> >
> > Do you mean:
> >
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:48, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 01:44, Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> reportbug uses the package
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 22:29 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I'm wondering... do we have binary packages for all kernel modules we have
> (free) -source packages for so that such kernel modules don't need to be
> built by users ?
No, but *most* of them are built by linux-modules-extra-2.6 or
linux-mo
Quoth Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 2008-07-19 00:44:04 +1200:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 08:23:27PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> > Description : text viewer, mainly used for reading text originally
> > novels
>
> Do you mean:
>
> Description : text viewer, mainly used for readin
"Sandro Tosi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm more inclined to Chris' position (not strip because binNMU can
> introduce bugs not present in previous version) but DDs more
> experienced than me can have a wider view and a different opinion.
I'd tend to agree -- better to err on the side of send
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 08:37:01AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
[..snip..]
> dom0 support is being worked on by Fedora people (I think) but there are
> no patches upstream yet.
We could recommend kvm+xenner+libvirt as "dom0" for people with
hardware virtualization support:
http://kraxel.fedorapeopl
Hello Developers!
I would like to hear some suggestions about this (#480563) bug
(trascript below):
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:48, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 01:44, Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Loïc Minier <[EMA
Il giorno gio, 17/07/2008 alle 17.30 -0500, William Pitcock ha scritto:
> > audacious-plugins is already compatible with the new version of
> > libprojectM... I've looked at the logs of buildd of
> audacious-plugins
> > and the projectM plugin isn't build from version 1.4.5-1, so the
> update
> > o
Florian Reitmeir dijo [Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:39:22AM +0200]:
> >openvz is actively working on namespace merge and using the emerging
> >bits. their patchsize is decreasing.
>
> and whats about vserver?
vserver support is just fine.
--
Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 08:23:27PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: txtreader
> Version : 0.4.4
> Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * URL : http://www.minisrc.com/?q=taxonomy/te
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:08:43AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 01:04:45AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> right but still no excuse to bring in a patch set that is *known*
> to not be merged upstream.
So OpenVZ is also out
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:44:53AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:23:19AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:08:43AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 01:04:45AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > > right but still no
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:23:19AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:08:43AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 01:04:45AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > right but still no excuse to bring in a patch set that is *known*
> > > to not be merged u
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:08:43AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 01:04:45AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > right but still no excuse to bring in a patch set that is *known*
> > to not be merged upstream.
>
> So OpenVZ is also out of reach.
openvz is actively working o
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 01:04:45AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> right but still no excuse to bring in a patch set that is *known*
> to not be merged upstream.
So OpenVZ is also out of reach.
Bastian
--
There is an order of things in this universe.
-- Apollo, "Who Mourns for
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 09:57:29AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
> Of course it is when it is to prevent a fairly substantial regression
> from etch. Whether etch should have shipped a dom0 or not is a
> different question and a little late to complain about now; we just have
> to do the best w
]] maximilian attems
| On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:45:21AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
| > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 05:34:28PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
| > > That SLES forward-port for 2.6.26 is not acceptable based on Debian kernel
| > > patch policy: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchA
18 matches
Mail list logo
