"Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I failed to fetch a human-readable patch info for psi in testing from
> patch-tracking.debian.net, for example.
Okay, take another example then:
http://patch-tracking.debian.net/package/ffmpeg-debian
When looking at the individual patches, you
ti, 2008-09-09 kello 12:50 +1000, Mark Purcell kirjoitti:
> We provide a patch target, which we felt meets the requirement of policy 2.8.
(There is no section 2.8 in the policy manual. The relevant section is
4.14,
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-readmesource)
> debian-de
"Mark Purcell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We provide a patch target, which we felt meets the requirement of policy 2.8.
>
> debian-devel, is there a view, does one need README.source if you
> provide a patch target and use one of the standard patch management
> systems? Seems like this would co
Sven,
We provide a patch target, which we felt meets the requirement of policy 2.8.
debian-devel, is there a view, does one need README.source if you provide a
patch target and use one of the standard patch management systems? Seems like
this would cover 90% of use cases and add very little val
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:44 AM, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As has been mentioned, you don't need a full project for a small script,
> or even just for hosting. You can always host things in your home space
> on alioth.
Fair enough.
> ~/public_bzr should work now. It's not as pol
"Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Many of Debian packages have a patches that fixes some important
> bugs which have not accepted by upstream for some reasons, some of
> them also contains improvements, Debian-specific or not.
[…]
> But how can users know about this changes in D
LinkedIn
REMINDERS:
Invitation Reminders:
* View Invitation from Shobhit Jindal
http://www.linkedin.com/e/uwTRS9NuUj0vo8kjIcGBPqZTCi3vo8VBXfNSMrhwsPJn/blk/725475667_2/cBYTdzoRdPgRczsLqnpPbOYWrSlI/svi/
PENDING MESSAGES:
There is a message
awaiting your resp
This one time, at band camp, Paul Wise said:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:12 AM, Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > and a sponsor for some space on alioth?
>
> That should not be nessecary, you can create a login and register a
> project (which is then manually approved) without being a
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2008-09-08, Eugene V. Lyubimkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> My proposal is make the new file named, for example, debian/divergences, =
[snip]
> I think you are trying to overengineer something.
> I really prefer the documentation of debian patches in the patch itself.
>
On 2008-09-08, Eugene V. Lyubimkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My proposal is make the new file named, for example, debian/divergences, =
> containing
> important for end users changes made in Debian package. Suggested format =
> may be the same
> we are using now to display lists in packages' lon
Hi -devel!
Many of Debian packages have a patches that fixes some important bugs which
have not
accepted by upstream for some reasons, some of them also contains improvements,
Debian-specific or not. Many maintainers in process of preparing Lenny release
cherry-picked important fixes and backport
Vincent Danjean wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
If you've got devscripts installed, then "bts reopen $bug .
reportspam $bug" will do the same.
I suppose that the 'reportspam' command does the same thing as the
link 'Send a report that this bug log contains spam' on the bts
webpage ?
Yes. It GE
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> If you've got devscripts installed, then "bts reopen $bug . reportspam
> $bug" will do the same.
I suppose that the 'reportspam' command does the same thing as the link
'Send a report that this bug log contains spam' on the bts webpage ?
When I saw this spam (on the glibc
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 06:35:12PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Maybe you should focus on providing the data in a machine-parseable
> > format, and write a seperate tool that would allow to gather data from
> > all the tests we are running (I can think of lintian and piuparts, at
> > least), and d
Your message dated Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:30:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing, as this is just a general request that...
has caused the Debian Bug report #271841,
regarding fonts and gui settings
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:39:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc already provides this
has caused the Debian Bug report #404715,
regarding make: add an option to allow system wide gcc options
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 166937 keep track of original permissions of package-owned files?
Bug#166937: general: package integrity/compliance testing with dpkg?
Changed Bug title to `keep track of original permissions of package-owned
files?' from `general: package inte
Your message dated Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:43:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line implemented elsewhere already (or please file seperate bugs if
thats not enough)
has caused the Debian Bug report #363486,
regarding dpkg: [update-alternatives] New categories for: WORD, EXCEL,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 173829 devscripts
Bug#173829: program to check against list of uncleaned files after build
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `devscripts'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trackin
reassign 173829 devscripts
thanks
Hi,
IMHO debuild should have an option to test for this, thus reassigning.
regards,
Holger
pgps1C1REqVOs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:37:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line there is newbiedoc now
has caused the Debian Bug report #128852,
regarding Ultra-newbie introductory documentation needed somewhere
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:28:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing after (more than) a week, as announced
has caused the Debian Bug report #482994,
regarding general: gnome applications fails to print with cups on remote
printer, authorization request n
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan, 2008-09-08 21:53:47 +0700 :
> I think this case is difficult for spam filter. The text is
> deliberately shuffled with HTML tables so that the final rendered
> page becomes readable to human readers, but the source is completely
> meaningless to the filter. It's then end
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It is the second times that this bug is closed by a spam to the -done
>> address. Is there something to do ? Someone to contact ?
>
> I believe t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, this reopens and also reports.
[...]
echo reopen $bug|
mail -s "Reopening $bug closed by spam" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w3m -dump
"http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugspam.cgi?bug=$bug;ok=ok"; else echo
If you've got devscripts installed, then "bts reopen $bug . r
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OK, this reopens and also reports.
> #!/bin/sh -eu
> #Reopen and report a Debian bug closed by spam, which you feed in via stdin.
> bug=$(
> perl -nwe 'if (s/^X-Debian-PR-Message: they-closed (\d+)$/$1/){print;exit}')
> if test $bug
> then
> set
OK, this reopens and also reports.
#!/bin/sh -eu
#Reopen and report a Debian bug closed by spam, which you feed in via stdin.
bug=$(
perl -nwe 'if (s/^X-Debian-PR-Message: they-closed (\d+)$/$1/){print;exit}')
if test $bug
then
set -x
echo reopen $bug|
mail -s "Reopening $bug closed by
Gentlemen, I can't take it anymore. That's why I hand it to
$ cat spam-bug-reopener
#!/bin/sh -eu
#reopen a Debian bug closed by spam, which you feed in via stdin
bug=$(
perl -nwe 'if (s/^X-Debian-PR-Message: they-closed (\d+)$/$1/){print;exit}')
if test $bug
then
echo reopen $bug|
mail -s
Your message dated Mon, 8 Sep 2008 14:29:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line dpkg has triggers now
has caused the Debian Bug report #229715,
regarding apt: Add a "postinst command spool"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 250102 debian-policy
Bug#250102: sometimes hard to figure out what package put files in /etc
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `debian-policy'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Patrick Winnertz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ldiskfsprogs
Version : 1.40.11
Upstream Author : Sun && Theodore Ts'o (see e2fsprogs package)
* URL : http://www.lustre.org && http://e2fsprogs.sourceforge.net/
* License
Your message dated Mon, 8 Sep 2008 10:38:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line "some combinations of fonts/terminals don't work"
has caused the Debian Bug report #62878,
regarding Screen display problems with terminals
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [2] http://www.g10-code.de/p-card.html
I assume this was supposed to be
http://www.g10code.de/p-card.html
Bjørn
--
Luser
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Franklin PIAT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> * More explicit messages (!)
internationalized ?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
34 matches
Mail list logo
