"Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What kind of elegant solution would you recommend? :)
>
> debian/rules:
>
> clean:
> ...
> make maintainer-clean
Note that, by the GNU Make documentation, you s
Hi,
there are currently 122 RC bugs remaining that affect both testing and
unstable. We need to fix them NOW.
However, in the permanent BSP state that has lasted for quite some time,
people seem to lose focus on this urgent need for the release. So the
idea is:
122 developers × 5 days =
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ocaml-batteries
Version : 1.0~alpha1
Upstream Author : David Teller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://batteries.forge.ocamlcore.org/
* License : LGPL (+ OCaml linking
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 02:35:20PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 01:36:28PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> >> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:10:07 +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> >>
> >>> In this case though, a second build will show changes in the diff
>
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 02:00:13PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 11.10.2008, 08:16 +0200 schrieb Sylvain Beucler:
>
> > The 'ballz' package (platform/puzzle game) requires a few changes in
> > the build system to avoid using the builtin copy of 'chichan' (GUI
> > toolkit for games
Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 01:36:28PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:10:07 +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
>>
>>> In this case though, a second build will show changes in the diff
>>> outside of debian/ (removed files).
>> No. Removed files don't show up i
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 01:36:28PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:10:07 +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
>
> > In this case though, a second build will show changes in the diff
> > outside of debian/ (removed files).
>
> No. Removed files don't show up in diff. :)
Ah, my bad.
Am Samstag, den 11.10.2008, 08:16 +0200 schrieb Sylvain Beucler:
> The 'ballz' package (platform/puzzle game) requires a few changes in
> the build system to avoid using the builtin copy of 'chichan' (GUI
> toolkit for games)
Besides your question: You should ask upstream to provide a configure
s
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:10:07 +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> In this case though, a second build will show changes in the diff
> outside of debian/ (removed files).
No. Removed files don't show up in diff. :)
David
--
. ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Li
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 01:10:07PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> In this case though, a second build will show changes in the diff
> outside of debian/ (removed files).
Did you even try that? dpkg-buildpackage -S ignores removed files for
the .diff.gz.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> However, in the permanent BSP state that has lasted for quite some time,
> people seem to lose focus on this urgent need for the release. So the
> idea is:
> 122 developers × 5 days = 122 RC bugs fixed
>
> The rules are
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 03:56:16PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > - a static patch to go to the 'maintainer-clean' state
>
> No, just running 'make maintainer-clean' in the clean rule of debian/rules.
>
> > - plus using
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: exe
Version : 1.04.0.3532
Upstream Author : Jim Tittsler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://exelearning.org/
* License : (GPL)
Programming Lang: (Python)
Description :
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 08:16:35 +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> What kind of elegant solution would you recommend? :)
>
remove all the generated files in debian/rules clean.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:20:40PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Manoj Srivastava said:
> > I can go either route. Comments?
> I'd say a -common package makes the most sense to me. The other way
> seems like you could conceivably end up with several roughly iden
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 02:23:54PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What kind of elegant solution would you recommend? :)
>
> debian/rules:
>
> clean:
> ...
> make maintainer-clean
Do you mean:
- a static
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - a static patch to go to the 'maintainer-clean' state
No, just running 'make maintainer-clean' in the clean rule of debian/rules.
> - plus using 'autoreconf' in debian/rule
Yep.
> Otherwise they will also be several
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Manoj Srivastava engaged keyboard and shared this with us
all:
>--} Hi folks,
>--}
>--} A new version of kernel-package has made its way to unstable.
>--} This is a extensive change, and addresses most of the problems that
>--} have been plaguing kernel-package, part
18 matches
Mail list logo
