On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Paul Wise (au) for fixing #479607 (still to be uploaded)
:D cookies :D
On the serious side, as I wrote in the bug report, I'm not as familiar
with debconf and maintainer scripts as I should be in order to fix
t
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> Why not, but note that local breweries are not that common around the
> world as they are (IIRC) in Germany. At least they weren't that common
> in Italy, but that's compensated by home-made liquors usually :) So
> let's generalize it to whatever liquid containing alc
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 07:48:21PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Let's make it a Beer Sprint. The winners receive a package with the
> local brew from the people who didn't manage to fix their bugs. I'm
> offering German beer to five winners, just as Joss did for cookies.
Why not, but note th
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:41:14AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: general
> Severity: serious
> Justification: DFSG
>
> raff.debian.org uses a Compaq Smart 5i RAID card. A flash memory is used
> to store the firmware. While the firmware is freely downloadable (as in
> beer) on HP website
Re: Pierre Habouzit 2008-10-30 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 04:52:58PM +, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Re: Pierre Habouzit 2008-10-30 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Anyways, the information is: I don't intend to maintain or run bts-link
> > > anymore[2], it is up for adoption. If the B
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ssvnc
Version : 1.0.20
Upstream Author : Karl J. Runge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.karlrunge.com/x11vnc/ssvnc.html
* License : GPL 2
Programming Lang: C, She
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>=2E.. hence, given that Lenny hasn't been release yet, when are we gonna
> make another one? :)
Let's make it a Beer Sprint. The winners receive a package with the local
brew from the people who didn't manage to fix their bugs. I'm offering
German beer to five winners, j
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 05:07:44PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>> Exactly because of the option of using custom built kernels, virtualbox
>> does not depend on the Debian modules packages, but only recommends
>> them (which IMO is correct: the Debian module package will be instal
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 01:39:47PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> the lenny Bug Sprint is over. I think it is a mitigated success.
^^^
this
I think it was a great success, it has proven that fun/game is a good
motivation among hackers, and that initiatives like this should be
done more frequ
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 01:39:47PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> The following people deserve a honorable mention for dealing with their
> bugs.
> * Gaudenz Steinlin for proposing approaches for #488669 (this is
> still work in progress)
Oh thanks for the honorable mention. I wi
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 05:07:44PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Because of some recent events, I thought about the possibility for
> > packages to depend against kernel module packages. As we don't want to
> > dictate the usage of Debian provided kernels, we need a last resort
[Alexandre Oliva]
> That's why packages that contain Free Software along with
> documentation under licenses that don't pass the DFSG end up split
> into separate packages. Keeping the documentation that didn't pass
> the DFSG wasn't deemed acceptable, neither was moving the whole
> package to no
On 31/10/08 at 13:39 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> The following people definitely deserve cookies. They provided patches
> for long-standing RC issues which are all fixed or soon to be.
> * Lucas Nussbaum (fr) and Emmanuel Bouthenot (fr) for working
> together on #501800/#496954
Bastian Blank wrote:
> Because of some recent events, I thought about the possibility for
> packages to depend against kernel module packages. As we don't want to
> dictate the usage of Debian provided kernels, we need a last resort
> fallback to the modules source.
Exactly because of the option o
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 01:39:47PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> * Sean Finney (us) for downgrading #501574 and fixing #267040
i'm in .se, actually :)
sean
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Damyan Ivanov escribió, en fecha 31/10/08 02:08:
> [Cc me on replies, thanks]
>
> Hi Jose and Anibal,
>
> You did sponsor packages for Christian Sánchez before, do you know if
> he is still active in Debian or how could I contact him?
Hello,
I've
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 09:01:18PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 16:33 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > So if any of the hardware that requires non-free firmware to operate and
> > currently works in etch was to not work with Lenny, then that's
> > completely unaccepta
Hello *,
while reading the forwarded messages in the BTS, I am supporting Bill
to continue maintaining "menu" since the "desktop" is hit by to many
limitations.
I have an Add-On to "menu" called "tdfvwm-menu" which is currently not
updated since I have some problems here in France...
Joss wrote:
>
>The following people failed to fix the bugs they were assigned, but the
>issues were either too complex or already tackled by other people. They
>are encouraged to contribute to the baking effort, still!
> * Josselin Mouette (fr) for not fixing the hppa kernel (I will
>b
On Friday 31 October 2008 22:20:26 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 31 octobre 2008 à 12:44 +0100, Bastian Blank a écrit :
> > Because of some recent events, I thought about the possibility for
> > packages to depend against kernel module packages. As we don't want to
> > dictate the usage of
Hi folks,
the lenny Bug Sprint is over. I think it is a mitigated success. A
success since a number of RC bugs were fixed, but mitigated by the small
number of players.
I’d like to thank all players for their contributions. The game was not
really fair since some issues were much easier to deal w
Le vendredi 31 octobre 2008 à 12:44 +0100, Bastian Blank a écrit :
> Because of some recent events, I thought about the possibility for
> packages to depend against kernel module packages. As we don't want to
> dictate the usage of Debian provided kernels, we need a last resort
> fallback to the mo
Hi folks
Because of some recent events, I thought about the possibility for
packages to depend against kernel module packages. As we don't want to
dictate the usage of Debian provided kernels, we need a last resort
fallback to the modules source.
My first solution was something like the following
Le jeudi 30 octobre 2008 à 17:37 -0200, Alexandre Oliva a écrit :
> It does make a difference when the components don't quite form an
> inseparable unit, but rather they're just put together in a single
> tarball for convenience.
Kernel modules are not really separable from the kernel image. You c
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 20:02 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> [1] I promised Christoph Berg that I am going to write a PHP extension,
> actually
> an interface, to libapt's functions; but I haven't been lucky enough to find
> the docs (libapt-pkg-doc isn't what I expected). If somebody can point me
25 matches
Mail list logo
