I have finally figured out how to remove the items with no owners from
the debconf database.
It took the fancy Makefile below, created by reverse engineering the
extremely complicated debconf system as far as I was able.
The big problem is that it is an extreme mystery how to do just
# debconf-wh
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo writes:
> The message you quoted is from Daniel Berrange, not me.
You're right. I should have read more carefully.
> Could you also tell your rationale for not agreeing with /?
The bar for adding new required entries to the root directory is now
very high. The fac
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 23:43 +0100, Harald Braumann wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:35:48 +0900
> Paul Wise wrote:
>
> > How about letting the person doing the installation write the labels
> > if they want to use LABEL and use UUID by default.
> >
> Or as a third option, put everything in LVM, in
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:40:39 -0800
Paul Menage wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Harald Braumann
> wrote:
> >
> > So, what's the problem with /dev/cgroups then? If shm/ and pts/
> > are allowed under /dev, wouldn't it be discriminating against
> > cgroups/, to not allow it there?
>
> Righ
> "LN" == Lucas Nussbaum writes:
LN> - using a local cache/proxy, such as approx, that would have the .debs
LN> you need if you first run piuparts online once on the packages you are
LN> interested in, before running it offline.
I used to run apt-get through WWWOFFLE, but then thought th
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Harald Braumann wrote:
>
> So, what's the problem with /dev/cgroups then? If shm/ and pts/
> are allowed under /dev, wouldn't it be discriminating against
> cgroups/, to not allow it there?
Right, that's what I proposed a couple of emails earlier in this thread.
P
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:14:03 -0800
Paul Menage wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:51 AM, sean finney
> wrote:
> > or /proc/bus/usb or /dev/shm or /dev/pts... :)
> >
>
> /dev is a bit different though - even if it's mounted as a udev fs,
> you can create a new directory in there to act as a mount
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:35:48 +0900
Paul Wise wrote:
> How about letting the person doing the installation write the labels
> if they want to use LABEL and use UUID by default.
>
Or as a third option, put everything in LVM, including boot and root,
and the problem goes away. GRUB2 would have to be
I found a bit of time to package up mdadm 2.6.7.2-1, which fixes two
RC bugs, but I cannot test it. I've built unofficial packages for
i386 and amd64 and put them at
http://debian.madduck.net/repo/pool/main/m/mdadm/
so please try them out if you can, otherwise I won't be able to
upload them soo
Best practises in team-maintaining packages - summary of the BOFs at DebConf8
=
Preface
---
* First of all please accept my apologies - I promised to write this summary
shortly after DebConf but ...
* I'm posting th
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:51 AM, sean finney wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 07:49:15PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> > Having one virtual filesystem mounted on top of another virtual
>> > filesystem seems like a recipe for problems.
>>
>> Like with /sys/fs/fuse/connections ? Come on, there is no
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 07:49:15PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Having one virtual filesystem mounted on top of another virtual
> > filesystem seems like a recipe for problems.
>
> Like with /sys/fs/fuse/connections ? Come on, there is no problem with a
> virtual filesystem mounted on top of anot
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 08:55:34AM -0800, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Gustavo Noronha wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 23:44 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> >> I agree with all that Thadeu Lima says here. I would add that cgroups
> >> are nothing to do with device nodes, so def
Paul Menage wrote:
>
> Having one virtual filesystem mounted on top of another virtual
> filesystem seems like a recipe for problems. /dev/cgroup or
> /dev/cgroup/ sounds more reasonable to me (although if
> anyone is still using devfs that would suffer from the same drawbacks)
I was leaning towa
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Gustavo Noronha wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 23:44 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
>> I agree with all that Thadeu Lima says here. I would add that cgroups
>> are nothing to do with device nodes, so definitely don't belong in
>> '/dev/' either.
>>
>> Since they're a file
Gabor Gombas (gomb...@sztaki.hu) said:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 10:24:16AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> > Putting new mount points in / is not really acceptable, so that rules
> > out the first two. /opt is just totally wrong, since that is intended
> > for add on software packages. /dev
Вы все еще задумываете над имиджем компании, поэтому не обращаетесь к e-mail
рассылкам?
Хватит! За окном кризис и надо выживать! Это недорого и действительно работает
(ведь Вы это письмо прочитали).
Звоните, пишите и уже завтра у Вас будут новые клиенты.
Тел.:(Ч95)585 62O9
ICQ: 3837 67 114
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 23:44 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> I agree with all that Thadeu Lima says here. I would add that cgroups
> are nothing to do with device nodes, so definitely don't belong in
> ‘/dev/’ either.
>
> Since they're a filesystem mapping “for browsing and manipulation
> from user spac
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 10:24:16AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Putting new mount points in / is not really acceptable, so that rules
> out the first two. /opt is just totally wrong, since that is intended
> for add on software packages. /dev/ feels a little odd, since it is
> not really dev
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 10:30:28AM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> Sorry. I didn't mean to imply that libvirt or Fedora did anything in
> respect to the mountpoint themselves. But that they are supporting or
> planning to support cgroups. And I think that one time we will need to
> so
--
# Nicolay DIMITROV .
# CRIS - Bât A 2ème étage
# Direction des Systèmes d'Information de l'Université Stendhal
# Domaine Universitaire 1180 avenue Centrale B.P.25 38040 Grenoble cedex 9
# Tel: 0476827797 Fax: 0476827754
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 11:44:00PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> "Daniel P. Berrange" writes:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:41:53PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> > wrote:
> > > So, we have some more options now: /cgroups, /containers,
> > > /dev/cpuset, /dev/cpuctl, /opt/cgroup, /opt/cp
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dominique Dumont
* Package name: libconfig-model-openssh-perl
Version : 1.203
Upstream Author : Dominique Dumont
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Config-Model-OpenSsh/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Desc
"Daniel P. Berrange" writes:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:41:53PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > So, we have some more options now: /cgroups, /containers,
> > /dev/cpuset, /dev/cpuctl, /opt/cgroup, /opt/cpuset.
>
> Putting new mount points in / is not really acceptable, so that
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 10:24:16AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:41:53PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > From what I've seen, most of them are in the same phases as Debian, or,
> > perhaps, behind. Fedora seems to plan that for Fedora 11, and they hav
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:41:53PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:52:46PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:26:11PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 18:00 -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > > > Hel
26 matches
Mail list logo
