On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:38:22AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > You can certainly obtain a similar result nowadays by putting the
> > > dependency that you want in debian/control directly and by using
> > > the -x option of dpkg-shlibdeps to strip the dependency that you did not
> > > want.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: ttf-sawarabi-gothic
Version: 20090302-1
Upstream Author: mshio
URL: http://sourceforge.jp/projects/sawarabi-fonts/
License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: ttf-misaki
Version: 11-20080603-1
Upstream Author: Num Kadoma
URL: http://www.geocities.jp/littlimi/misaki.htm
License: These fonts are free softwares.
Unlim
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Evgeni Golov
* Package name: u3-tool
Version : 0.0~svn5
Upstream Author : Daviedev
* URL : http://u3-tool.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-2+, LGPL-2.1
Programming Lang: C
Description : tool for controlling the s
On 2009-03-08 jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Package: exim4-config
> Version: 4.69-9
> Severity: important
> File: /usr/sbin/update-exim4.conf
> starting with bash version 4.0-1:
> /var/log/boot:Sun Mar 8 19:13:03 2009: Starting
> MTA:/usr/sbin/update-exim4.conf: line 38: $@: unbound variable
> b
Hi,
since I'm working on svn-buildpackage which aims at a similar target I'm
open for suggestions, so I pick some of your ideas up...
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:55:11AM +1000, James Westby wrote:
[bzr-builddeb]
> * Building a 3.0 (quilt) package worked ok. There are two things
> that
> wi
Dear debian-devel,
dear maintainers of packages that contain lrmi.{c,h},
today Lucas has reported #518725 - atitvout FTBFS because of missing
*_MASK defines.
Seeing that bug and remembering fun with lrmi myself, I thought I can
have a look how many other packages will FTBFS.
The following package
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009, James Westby wrote:
> * Building a 3.0 (native) package worked fine.
> * Building a 3.0 (quilt) package worked ok. There are two things that
> will need work here though:
> - If there are more tarballs required than .orig.tar.gz and
> .debian.tar.gz then it w
Evgeni Golov wrote:
>All other (incl David), is there any interest in forking libx86 and
>using it globally instead of fixing that ftbfs 7 times?
You could just send a patch to libx86 upstream, you know...
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.de...@srcf.ucam.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 05:11:59PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> In theory you can use "dpkg-source --skip-patches -x" and import
> everything except the debian dir. Those are the upstream sources, I'm not
> sure it's interesting to handle each upstream tarball separately. In fact,
> doing so cou
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:17:44 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >All other (incl David), is there any interest in forking libx86 and
> >using it globally instead of fixing that ftbfs 7 times?
>
> You could just send a patch to libx86 upstream, you know...
The patch for what?
For the *_MASK defines F
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 16:49:33 +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> Dear debian-devel,
> dear maintainers of packages that contain lrmi.{c,h},
Hello Evgeni,
thanks for this heads up.
> [..]
> The following packages contain lrmi.{c,h}, [..]
> But actually we should stop duplicating code (esp. OLD code - som
Evgeni Golov wrote:
>On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:17:44 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
>> >All other (incl David), is there any interest in forking libx86 and
>> >using it globally instead of fixing that ftbfs 7 times?
>>
>> You could just send a patch to libx86 upstream, you know...
>
>The patch for w
David Paleino wrote:
>I'll start work on liblrmi (i.e. ITP, making it, buildtesting relevant
>packages, [..]) if some interest is shown.
I'm not sure what the benefit would be over libx86? liblrmi would leave
you stuck with x86, whereas using libx86 means that much of the code
will also work o
Please don't break threads ;)
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:12:01 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> David Paleino wrote:
>
> >I'll start work on liblrmi (i.e. ITP, making it, buildtesting relevant
> >packages, [..]) if some interest is shown.
>
> I'm not sure what the benefit would be over libx86?
IMV
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 19:19:47 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:12:01 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > David Paleino wrote:
> >
> > >I'll start work on liblrmi (i.e. ITP, making it, buildtesting relevant
> > >packages, [..]) if some interest is shown.
> >
> > I'm not sure w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Mohammed Adnène Trojette"
* Package name: xz
Version : 4.999.8beta
Upstream Author : Lasse Collins
* URL : http://tukaani.org/xz/
* License : - public domain (src/liblzma/check, tests/files)
- LGPL 2.
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:37:33 +0100
Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Mohammed Adnène Trojette"
>
> * Package name: xz
Would xz-utils not be a better package name?
> XZ Utils consist of a few relatively separate parts:
Short package names are n
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:37:33 +0100
> Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
>
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: "Mohammed Adnène Trojette"
> >
> > * Package name: xz
>
> Would xz-utils not be a better package name?
xz will be the sou
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 19:24:22 +0100 David Paleino wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 19:19:47 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:12:01 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >
> > > David Paleino wrote:
> > >
> > > >I'll start work on liblrmi (i.e. ITP, making it, buildtesting relevant
>
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> In practice, there's one exception, the debian tarball can contain
> binary files that are installed outside of the debian dir. Those are
> necessary listed in debian/source/include_binaries.
According to the dpkg-source man page, you mean include-binaries.
Is there a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marius Vollmer
* Package name: magit
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Marius Vollmer
* URL : http://zagadka.vm.bytemark.co.uk/magit/
* License : GPLv3, FDL
Programming Lang: Elisp
Description : A Emacs interface
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 16:49:33 +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> [..]
> David, is there any chance that libx86 will be updated someday? Esp
> because upstream of v86d has an updated 0.10 in his git at
> http://repo.or.cz/w/v86d.git and Debian's v86d is not using it in
> favour of not build duplicate code.
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 20:34:12 +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 19:24:22 +0100 David Paleino wrote:
>
> > [.. regarding libx86 ..]
>
> May I throw in the fact that one sometimes wants x86emu on i386?
Yes, I *do* remember your bugreport about it ;) (apropos: sorry if I didn't
even re
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vsevolod Velichko
* Package name: qutim-protocol-mrim
Upstream Author : Peter Rusanov
* URL : http://qutim.org/
* License : GPL v2 or later
Programming Lang: C++
Description : qutIM MRIM protocol support
Protocol plugin,
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 09:07:29PM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> Matthew: since you're libx86 upstream, you might be interested in the contents
> of debian/patches, I'll remove those as soon as you release a new version
> (also, please drop debian/ from upstream tarballs)
Thanks, I'll take a look
Hi folks,
I have released sbuild version 0.58.0. This is the first release for
quite some time (August 2008), and there are a lot of changes since that
time which got queued up waiting for the release of Lenny. There are
quite a few user-visible changes, and some older options and features
which
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rafael Laboissiere
* Package name: csv2latex
Version : 0.12
Upstream Author : Benoît Rouits
* URL : http://brouits.free.fr/csv2latex/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C
Description : a CSV to LaTeX file conve
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Roberto C. Sanchez"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: shorewall6
Version : 4.2.6
Upstream Author : Tom Eastep
* URL : http://www.shorewall.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Des
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Roberto C. Sanchez"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: shorewall6-lite
Version : 4.2.6
Upstream Author : Tom Eastep
* URL : http://www.shorewall.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: sh
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2009-03-08
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: parallel
Version : 20090218
Upstream Author : Ole Tange
* URL : https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/parallel/
* License : GPLv3
Description : build and execute command line
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2009-03-09
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dots
Version : 0.0.20090222
Upstream Author : Eitan Isaacson
* URL : https://github.com/eeejay/dots/tree
* License : GPLv3
Description : braille translation user interface
Jan Hauke Rahm dijo [Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:15:21AM +0100]:
> > All in all, things are in a rather good shape but I still need some help.
> > While I tested extensively the dpkg-source side, we still need to ensure
> > that all our additional tools cope well with the new source package
> > format
Hi,
Joerg Jaspert dijo [Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:07:35PM +0100]:
> As Lenny is finally released, and we are early in the cycle for squeeze,
> now is the best time to do some long-needed changes to our archive.
> Much of what we are currently doing is not visible to you as a user of
> this archive,
Gunnar Wolf writes:
> Ok. Lintian does not yet like httpd as a section, but I guess you will
> not reject an upload just because I listened to you ;-)
Lintian is waiting for the d-d-a post saying that the new section changes
have been implemented, FWIW.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 03:45:01PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Jaap Boender [Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:47:01 +0100]:
>
> Hello, Jaap.
>
> > The explanation: since ppmtofb conflicts with any python version strictly
> > higher than 2.4, any package that depends on python-2.4 will not be
> > install
36 matches
Mail list logo
