Hello,
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 01:18 +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <20090520155616.ga29...@bongo.bofh.it> you wrote:
> > Does anybody see any downsides to this?
>
> It does not make sense to me. the network will be stopped after the daemon
> if the daemon is confgured with correct depe
Dear User,
The Fax message you just sent:
Destination:
Subject:
Failed for the following reason(s):
___
* You forgot to place your password in the subject line of the email. Please
include the word 'pass' followed by a space and your password in the subject
line.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francois Marier
* Package name: pdfresurrect
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Matt Davis
* URL : http://www.757labs.com/projects/pdfresurrect/
* License : GPLv3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : extract or scrub
Hi folks,
As some of you may already know, I have been doing a lot of package
removals and QA work. One of the ones I ran across lately is
OpenMotif. It has been orphaned since 2006 and has several bugs against
it. However, it does still have 1 r(b)depends. (arb which is also in
non-free).
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 08:50:09PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Hmm, would that mean gpg --enable-dsa2 --cert-digest-algo SHA256 or
> something?
> Also, does gpg have an option to make it output the hash algorithms of key
> (ID) signatures? I can't seem to find one.
Feed a key to gpg --list-
Robert Millan writes:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 03:44:38AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 22:18:51 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>> > Package: wnpp
>> > Severity: wishlist
>> > Owner: Robert Millan
>> >
>> > * Package name: vsag
>> > Version : 0.0.1
In article <20090520155616.ga29...@bongo.bofh.it> you wrote:
> Does anybody see any downsides to this?
It does not make sense to me. the network will be stopped after the daemon
if the daemon is confgured with correct dependencies. And even if not, its
a matter of seconds until the host shuts dow
Goswin von Brederlow writes:
> Russ Allbery writes:
>> So, y'all realize that pdebuild --buildresult .. by default breaks
>> the *_source.changes file that it generates because it regenerates a
>> source package as part of the regular build, right? How are you
>> actually using that *_source.ch
On onsdagen den 20 maj 2009, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> My attitude to this is that yes, people should be considering replacing
> their existing GPG keys with something stronger using SHA256 or better
> for signatures (and a keysize of greater than 1024 bits).
Hmm, would that mean gpg --enable-ds
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dominic Hargreaves
* Package name: libnet-sslglue-perl
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Steffen Ullrich
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-SSLGlue/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Programming Lang: Perl
Description
Does anybody see any downsides to this?
- Forwarded message from Teodor -
From: Teodor
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: Bug#529624: netbase: networking should not be stopped on reboot or
halt
Package: netbase
Version: 4.34
Severity: important
Tags: patch
The current LS
Malte Forkel wrote:
> Sandro Tosi schrieb:
>> A general rule may be: patch upstream source code, not debian packaging file.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> Well, my patch is active if its in 00list :-)
>
> But you're right, adding the dependency to debian/control is safe and
> easy. It just "doesn't feel rig
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 02:28:52PM +0200, Malte Forkel wrote:
> an optional patch that I'd like to add to a package requires an
> additional build dependency. If I append that dependency to
> Build-Depends in debian/control as part of my patch, it is not checked
> in time. It seems, the build depe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ignace Mouzannar
* Package name: pytemplate
Version : 1.5.1
Upstream Author : Stéphane Bulot
* URL :
http://www.bulot.org/wiki/doku.php?id=projects:python:pytemplate
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Descrip
Sandro Tosi schrieb:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 14:28, Malte Forkel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> an optional patch that I'd like to add to a package requires an
>> additional build dependency. If I append that dependency to
>> Build-Depends in debian/control as part of my patch, it is not checked
>> in time
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 03:44:38AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 22:18:51 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Robert Millan
> >
> > * Package name: vsag
> > Version : 0.0.1
> > Upstream Author : Robert Mill
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 14:28, Malte Forkel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> an optional patch that I'd like to add to a package requires an
> additional build dependency. If I append that dependency to
> Build-Depends in debian/control as part of my patch, it is not checked
> in time. It seems, the build depende
Hi,
an optional patch that I'd like to add to a package requires an
additional build dependency. If I append that dependency to
Build-Depends in debian/control as part of my patch, it is not checked
in time. It seems, the build dependencies are checked (by debuild) or
checked and satisfied (by pde
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 07:43:53PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Jonathan McDowell writes:
> > * Replacement of the old key with the new one should not cause any
> > other key to no longer be in Debian's Web of Trust nor strongly
> > connected subset.
>
> Is there a simple way of checking whether th
Rene Engelhard dixit:
>Actually no, it's not. And it has some RC bugs right now even from
>quickly looking at it
Thanks for looking at it, still.
>- Depends: openoffice.org-common
>
>"for Writer". Please depend on writer. (which in turn depends on -common
>anyway)
Okay. I only looked for whic
Jonathan McDowell writes:
> * Replacement of the old key with the new one should not cause any
> other key to no longer be in Debian's Web of Trust nor strongly
> connected subset.
Is there a simple way of checking whether this is true for a given key?
> * Replacement of the old key with the ne
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > https://eurynome.mirbsd.org/debs/dists/hardy/wtf/pkgs/openoffice-ext/openoffice.org-altsearch_1.2.2-1~wtf804+1.dsc
> >
> > This is what we’ll use at work¹ for now; the final version will
> > of course target sid. I think this is also a nice e
Russ Allbery writes:
> Ben Finney writes:
>> Russ Allbery writes:
>>> Cyril Brulebois writes:
>
You call it superfluous. It's particularly helpful for source-only
uploads.
>
>>> Well, yes, it's superfluous for Debian, which doesn't support
>>> source-only uploads.
>
>> But not for ha
Le lundi 18 mai 2009 à 07:42 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit :
> On Sun, 17 May 2009 23:18:40 +0100
> > Olivier, please go ahead and package it.
>
> Agreed. Also, when packaging it, check the 7 source packages that I
> listed above and see if the copies have been substantially modified.
> You may ne
24 matches
Mail list logo
