On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 23:49, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> The format for such bug reports against the ftp.debian.org
> pseudopackage:
>
> Subject: override: PACKAGE1:section/priority, [...], PACKAGEX:section/priority
>
> Include the justification for the change in the body of the bug please.
>
> (I hope
Christian Perrier schrieb am Tuesday, den 04. August 2009:
Hi,
> > > look it up yourself:
> > > http://lists.debian.org/archive-spam-removals/review/stats.html (my
> > > user is morph...). So, are you going to help us kill spam (reporting
> > > it) or no time for this?
> >
> > So you're Debian'
Bastian Blank writes:
> What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then?
At present, I would expect that to run into file conflicts with
libc6. In the future, yes, that could be a problem without
appropriate Breaks: or Conflicts: declarations. :-/
One possible workaround coul
]] Charles Plessy
| I am all for campaigning for the unified diff format if there are
| arguments on which I can base a discussion with Upstream, but a mere
| cultural preference, be it the one of a very large majority, is a too
| weak argument.
They're easier to review (because you have a bit o
> The web summary of the queue contents lists the packages by upload date, but I
> remember reading from you in a previous discussion that the queue is processed
> according to the date of the first upload. Unfortunately, I lost the
> reference…
> Can you confirm, or can somebody point me at the
Charles Plessy writes:
> Le Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 01:37:29PM +0200, Paul Wise a écrit :
>> I think tying such information to a source or binary package is a bad
>> idea since it changes independently of the package. I have similar
>> issues with the Homepage field and to a lesser extent, watch fi
Charles Plessy writes:
> Le Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 03:45:00PM +1000, Ben Finney a écrit :
> >
> > The point, rather, seems to be that unified-diff format is the de
> > facto standard format for exchanging patch information.
>
> Le Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:53:21AM +0200, Michael Banck a écrit :
> >
Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 03:45:00PM +1000, Ben Finney a écrit :
The point, rather, seems to be that unified-diff format is the de facto
standard format for exchanging patch information.
Le Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:53:21AM +0200, Michael Banck a écrit :
It's the preferred f
Charles Plessy (05/08/2009):
> In my workplace's cafeteria, 99 % of the people eat curry rice with a
> spoon, and 1 % with chopsticks. But this is causing no trouble, and
> never the spoon users ask the chopsticks users to change their
> instrument (and I can tell you that I do not leave a single
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Bremner
* Package name: libsynthesis
Version : 3.0.28+git1+cc01b66
Upstream Author :
* URL : http://www.synthesis.ch/indefero/index.php/p/libsynthesis/
* License : LGPL2.1 or LGPL3 (with some BSD)
.
Unless no
Le Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 03:45:00PM +1000, Ben Finney a écrit :
>
> The point, rather, seems to be that unified-diff format is the de facto
> standard format for exchanging patch information.
Le Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:53:21AM +0200, Michael Banck a écrit :
>
> It's the preferred format for 99% o
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the phpwiki package. In particular, I
need assistance dealing with a number of bugs related to code from other
packages that is embedded within the PHPwiki codebase. There is also at least
one further instance of this reported by
Michael Banck (05/08/2009):
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:15:22AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > And for the format of the patch, I do not know what to tell them
> > apart that unified diff is the preferred format of some Debian
> > developers,
>
> It's the preferred format for 99% of all Free
sandro (05/08/2009):
> What should I do to have 2 packages defined in control, one a python
> package and one a documentation package and use cdbs?
Try -ment...@.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I have a package named python-sqlkit with python package sqlkit. I'm using
cdbs with a simple rule and the packge is ok:
#!/usr/bin/make -f
include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
DEB_PYTHON_SYSTEM = pysupport
DEB_COMPRESS_EXCLUDE := .py .sqlite
include /usr/share/cd
Le Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 01:37:29PM +0200, Paul Wise a écrit :
> I think tying such information to a source or binary package is a bad
> idea since it changes independently of the package. I have similar
> issues with the Homepage field and to a lesser extent, watch files.
>
> Do you think that apt
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:15:22AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> And for the format of the patch, I do not know what to tell them apart that
> unified diff is the preferred format of some Debian developers,
It's the preferred format for 99% of all Free Software work/projects
AFAICT.
> and that
Am Mittwoch, den 08.07.2009, 18:40 +0200 schrieb Walter Franzini:
> Hi,
>
> in the past months I've tryied without success to contact Christian
> Meder (ch...@absolutegiganten.org), the maintainer of the aegis package,
> offering my help.
>
> As a Debian and Aegis user I'm a bit worried of state
18 matches
Mail list logo
