I have a program that depends on 2.6 but I can't seem to get the
required modules to install in squeeze/sid. The ones in the package
management system only work for 2.5. Is there some big transition
coming?
Mark
On Aug 27, 2009, at 21:05, Russ Allbery wrote:
Josselin Mouette writes:
Josselin Mouette writes:
> First, the installation path changed from site-packages to
> dist-packages. This means that most Python packages will need two
> changes:
> * passing --install-layout=deb to setup.py
Okay, that's easy enough. I assume that doesn't break builds for Python
2.5 (
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Andrea Veri wrote:
> hi,
>
Hi,
> since some time I'm wondering why there is *not* a Debian-p2p team
> active already. We have several p2p-related packages in the archive and
> it looks like they are maintained individually and not by a specific
> team. Therefore
Odd, only the ata- ones are doubled.
$ ls /dev/disk/by-id/
ata-FUJITSU_MHT2040AT_FUJITSU_MHT2040AT_NN4GT531H3AR
ata-FUJITSU_MHT2040AT_FUJITSU_MHT2040AT_NN4GT531H3AR-part1
ata-FUJITSU_MHT2040AT_FUJITSU_MHT2040AT_NN4GT531H3AR-part10
ata-FUJITSU_MHT2040AT_FUJITSU_MHT2040AT_NN4GT531H3AR-part3
ata-HL-DT
~ % ls /dev/disk/by-id/ | head -n 1
ata-G.SKILL_64GB_SSD_MK0C090311452@
That's all I see. I'm using zsh by the way.
Mark
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:28 PM, wrote:
> Started happening last week, this became doubled:
>
> $ ls /dev/disk/by-id/ | head -n 1
> ata-FUJITSU_MHT2040AT_FUJITSU_MHT20
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 504 (new: 72)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 136 (new: 6)
Total number of packages reques
Started happening last week, this became doubled:
$ ls /dev/disk/by-id/ | head -n 1
ata-FUJITSU_MHT2040AT_FUJITSU_MHT2040AT_NN4GT531H3AR
- -
^ ^
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers experimental
http://bugs.debian.org/cg
hi,
since some time I'm wondering why there is *not* a Debian-p2p team
active already. We have several p2p-related packages in the archive and
it looks like they are maintained individually and not by a specific
team. Therefore I would like to add some questions about this:
1. Why no one had the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Villa Alises
Package name: go2
Version : 0.090827
Upstream Author : David Villa Alises
URL : http://arco.esi.uclm.es/~david.villa/go2.html
License : GPLv2+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : A fa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jeremy Lal
* Package name: libjs-orbited
Version : 0.7.10
Upstream Author : Michael Carter
* URL : http://www.orbited.org/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Javascript
Description : TCPSocket javascript client f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jeremy Lal
* Package name: python-orbited
Version : 0.7.10
Upstream Author : Michael Carter
* URL : http://www.orbited.org/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : HTTP daemon that is optimized fo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Noah Meyerhans
* Package name: choqok
Version : 0.6.6
Upstream Author : Mehrdad Momeny
* URL : http://choqok.gnufolks.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : KDE microblogging client
Choqok is
Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libmoosex-configfromfile-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Brandon L. Black,
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Con
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Matthäi schrieb:
> Hello lists and maxmind,
>
> (please CC me in your replys, I am not subscribed to debian-legal@ and
> debian-devel@, thanks).
I am now, so ignore it. :)
.
> But I have got a serious problem with it:
> 1) upstream deli
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: ffprobe
Version : 0.svn20090707
Upstream Author : Stefano Sabatini
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/ffprobe/
* License : GPL, LGPL
Programming Lang: C, Perl
Description : mu
belahcene wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I generate a debian package for the more recent lyx (1.6.4), I want to
> share it, how and where to upload it.
You should talk to the Debian lyx maintainers, which is as far as I remember a
team, so you could probably join it. Working on packages somewhere else is a
was
Am Mittwoch 26 August 2009 19:06:22 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 09:48:56PM +0100, Sam Morris wrote:
> > Although on Debian, the same shared library files (libfoo.so) are used
> > by both compilers to link against, and ld-linux (what is that thing
> > called? The "loader"? The
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jeremy Lal
* Package name: rabbitmq-stomp
Version : 1.6.0
Upstream Author : Tony Garnock-Jones
* URL : https://dev.rabbitmq.com/wiki/StompGateway
* License : MPL 1.1
Programming Lang: Erlang
Description : A STO
You want the debian-mentors list. Setting Mail-Followup-To and keeping the
full text below. Please upload your package somewhere for the mentors to
review, and drop the other lists when you reply.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:24:47AM +0100, belahcene wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I generate a debian package for
Hi,
I generate a debian package for the more recent lyx (1.6.4), I want to
share it, how and where to upload it.
The file is generated for debian lenny (5.0) and can normally used on
recent ubuntu .
I am not a guru for creating debian package, so I need feed back. Thanks
for testing and
20 matches
Mail list logo
