Le Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 12:20:51AM -, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> > Thomas,
> >
> > It's not my position to get into Debian's debate. I can confirm for you
> > that Ext JS can absolutely be licensed under GPL v3 without qualification.
> > If there is commentary that can be read counter to that,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:44:21AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
There has also been some similar discussions in Ubuntu with some
users reporting that some web sites and packages don't work with
openjdk but I have not seen a lot of concrete proof.
I might look a naive
On Do, 08 Okt 2009, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Today. Ana has uploaded kde-minimal yesterday.
Sorry for bothering your on the same day ;-)
> No, a boost bug. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=550006
Ah, ok, thanks.
Best wishes
Norbert
> Thomas,
>
> It's not my position to get into Debian's debate. I can confirm for you
> that Ext JS can absolutely be licensed under GPL v3 without qualification.
> If there is commentary that can be read counter to that, then that is not a
> good read of what we are saying. From a legal standpoin
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 613 (new: 8)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 146 (new: 2)
Total number of packages request
Barry deFreese wrote:
> My personal feeling is that we either need to remove it or fix it up.
>
> Any thoughts?
Given its status, I'm all for removing it.
Cheers,
Emilio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 03:08:59PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Well that brings up part of my question. I doubt we have a smooth
> migration since sun-java6 doesn't even have a maintainer. Even Sun
> is End Of Lifing sun-java6 soonish ( at least the potential is there
> that it could get EOL'd
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 09:03:25PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> > I might look a naive user here, but with openjdk I still don't have
> > plugin support in firefox 3.5, whereas it was working with
> This is a bug, and it has already been filed. The maintainer has fixed
> it in the Ubuntu vers
reassign 541100 icedtea6-plugin
kthxbye
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 07:39:33PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:44:21AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> > There has also been some similar discussions in Ubuntu with some
> > users reporting that some web sites and packages do
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:44:21AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
There has also been some similar discussions in Ubuntu with some
users reporting that some web sites and packages don't work with
openjdk but I have not seen a lot of concrete proof.
I might look
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:44:21AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> There has also been some similar discussions in Ubuntu with some
> users reporting that some web sites and packages don't work with
> openjdk but I have not seen a lot of concrete proof.
... actually, #547457, #533619. I'm personal
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:44:21AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> There has also been some similar discussions in Ubuntu with some
> users reporting that some web sites and packages don't work with
> openjdk but I have not seen a lot of concrete proof.
I might look a naive user here, but with open
Could the list subscriber who is using this service please stop it
from sending list posters incredibly confusing bounce messages please?
It looks like the bounces contain vaguely private information so
not reposting here, but it is stripping out all the useful headers
and generating messages like
Hi folks,
A few of us have been discussing the removal of sun-java6. It is
non-free, orphaned, buggy (including security bugs), and can generally
be replaced by openjdk. There are only three reverse depends left and
none of them directly depend on sun-java6 but instead dep on java6-runtime.
Hi again,
now aptcc backend install/remove/update
things in noninteractive mode, and following
Josselin Mouette advices I'm planning to write
a DBus frontend to debconf that will emit a signal
when it needs a Session frontend to be attached.
I created a sequence diagram to ilustrate what i'm
plan
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jeremy Lal
* Package name: redmine-plugin-botsfilter
Version : 1.01
Upstream Author : Jean-Philippe Lang
* URL : http://www.redmine.org/wiki/redmine/PluginBotsFilter
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: Ruby
Descript
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dominic Hargreaves
* Package name: rt-extension-emailcompletion
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : Nicholas Chuche
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/RTx-EmailCompletion/
* License : Artistic and GPL
Programming Lang: P
Hi norbert,
> Is there a specification about "soon"?
Today. Ana has uploaded kde-minimal yesterday.
> The problem is that I not
> even can build 4.3.1-2 (see FTBFS bug report).
>
> Maybe this is related to the big python stall that is happening
> at the same time, anyone having an idea on that?
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Jean-Baptiste Denis"
* Package name: audiotools
Version : 2.13
Upstream Author : Brian Langenberger
* URL : http://audiotools.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python, C
Description : Collectio
Hi Fathi,
On Mo, 05 Okt 2009, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > Do the maintainers of these packages plan to upload fixed packages
> > soon?
> >
> > I have tried to update by recompiling, but unfortunately the kdepim
> > suite FTBFS, I submitted a b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian GIS Project
* Package name: python-liblas
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : Howard Butler
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/libLAS
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : A Python module t
Le mercredi 7 octobre 2009 21:13:45, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > ucf has a rather crude upgrade strategy: either accept upstream or keep
> > your file or use your favorite editor.
>
> That's not true. ucf supports three-way merges.
You're right.
But three-way merge still requires the end-user
* Carlo Segre (se...@iit.edu) [091008 08:17]:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> since our recent release update, things have been moving a bit. We'd
>> like to give you the basic status of all our architectures for
>> Squeeze, for details please see the individual mails (and
23 matches
Mail list logo
