Re: Bug#550860: ITP: gnaughty -- downloader for adult content

2009-10-13 Thread martin f krafft
> Do you know about bug 283578 ? The name 'hot-babe' referenced a gender. gnaughty references a natural tendency (and a graphical toolkit). I don't see how #550860 is any different from a normal ITP for the Universal Operating System, and should thus not receive any more attention. -- .''`. m

Bug#550912: ITP: emerillon -- map viewer for the GNOME desktop

2009-10-13 Thread Mathieu Trudel
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mathieu Trudel * Package name: emerillon Version : 0.0~git.20091008t211425.6461efc Upstream Author : Pierre-Luc Beaudoin * URL : http://www.novopia.com/emerillon/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C++ Description

Re: Bug#550860: ITP: gnaughty -- downloader for adult content

2009-10-13 Thread Russell Coker
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Michal Čihař wrote: > > >   Description     : downloader for adult content > > > > > > Program to automatically download adult sex content, i.e. porn movies > > > and pictures, from a known internet porn directory. > > > > > > Providing a friendly interface, users who feel lik

RFP - namebench

2009-10-13 Thread Russell Coker
http://sprocket.io/blog/2009/10/benchmarking-dns-servers/ http://code.google.com/p/namebench/ Namebench is a Google 20% project that benchmarks DNS servers for web client use. It's under the Apache license and it would be nice if someone could package it (unfortunately I don't have time to take

Re: Bug#550860: ITP: gnaughty -- downloader for adult content

2009-10-13 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:58:01 +0200 Frederic Peters napsal(a): > Michal Čihař wrote: > > > * Package name: gnaughty > > Version : 1.2.0 > > Upstream Author : Troy McClure > > * URL : http://gnaughty.sourceforge.net/ > > * License : GPL > > Programming L

Re: Bug#550860: ITP: gnaughty -- downloader for adult content

2009-10-13 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:24:02PM +0200, Michal ??iha?? wrote: > * Package name: gnaughty Gnome projects starting with a 'g' are lame. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Bug#550860: ITP: gnaughty -- downloader for adult content

2009-10-13 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 05:58:01PM +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: > Michal Čihař wrote: > > > * Package name: gnaughty > > Version : 1.2.0 > > Upstream Author : Troy McClure > > * URL : http://gnaughty.sourceforge.net/ > > * License : GPL > > Programming Lang:

Re: Bug#550860: ITP: gnaughty -- downloader for adult content

2009-10-13 Thread Frederic Peters
Michal Čihař wrote: > * Package name: gnaughty > Version : 1.2.0 > Upstream Author : Troy McClure > * URL : http://gnaughty.sourceforge.net/ > * License : GPL > Programming Lang: C > Description : downloader for adult content > > Program to automatical

Bug#544590: marked as done (Screen On Off Issue)

2009-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:19:24 +0200 with message-id <200910131719.25274.hol...@layer-acht.org> and subject line Re: Bug#544590: moreinfo has caused the Debian Bug report #544590, regarding Screen On Off Issue to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Re: Permissions of /var/mail/$USER

2009-10-13 Thread Timo Sirainen
(Sorry about messing up threading, but I'm not subscribed and wasn't Cc'd) > > IIRC, it was a problem for the support of shared mailboxes. > > Index files are created whose permissions mimic the mailbox' permissions. > > The 'mail' group ownership would require dovecot to be in the mail group. >

Bug#550848: ITP: python-oauth -- Python library implementing of the OAuth protocol

2009-10-13 Thread TANIGUCHI Takaki
Package: wnpp Owner: tak...@asis.media-as.org Severity: wishlist * Package name: python-oauth Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : Leah Culver * URL or Web page : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/oauth/ * License : MIT Description : Python library implementing of the OAuth p

Re: Bug#550817: ITP: gitolite -- standalone, souped-up version of gitosis

2009-10-13 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:50:37AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Hi! > > * Stefano Zacchiroli [2009-10-13 11:03:00 CEST]: > > What if one has no idea of what "gitosis" is? For such a person, the > > above description will be close to meaningless. I suggest expanding in a > > couple of word

Bug#544590: moreinfo

2009-10-13 Thread Holger Levsen
tags 544590 + moreinfo thanks Hi Praveen, what graphics card do you have and which driver do you use? (please post the output of "lspci -n" and "dpkg -l|grep xserver-xorg-video") can you try kernel 2.6.30 and see if the problem is still there? thanks, Holger signature.asc Descriptio

Processed: moreinfo

2009-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 544590 + moreinfo Bug #544590 [general] Screen On Off Issue Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Re: Bug#550817: ITP: gitolite -- standalone, souped-up version of gitosis

2009-10-13 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Filippo Rusconi [2009-10-13 12:06:29 CEST]: > Well, I think that ITP bugs are *more* useful when the person reading > the bug report can tell what the intended-to-be-packaged software > does. There's always the upstream URL included that you can follow if you think it's unclear anyway. > Some

Re: Bug#550817: ITP: gitolite -- standalone, souped-up version of gitosis

2009-10-13 Thread Sitaram Chamarty
on 13/10/09 14:33 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:15:24AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > >> Description : standalone, souped-up version of gitosis >> >> Gitolite is a rewrite of gitosis, with a completely different config >> file that allows (at last!) access control

Re: Bug#550817: ITP: gitolite -- standalone, souped-up version of gitosis

2009-10-13 Thread Filippo Rusconi
Greetings Debianists, On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:50:37AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > Hi! > > * Stefano Zacchiroli [2009-10-13 11:03:00 CEST]: > > What if one has no idea of what "gitosis" is? For such a person, the > > above description will be close to meaningless. I suggest expandi

Bug#550817: ITP: gitolite -- standalone, souped-up version of gitosis

2009-10-13 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Gerfried Fuchs * Package name: gitolite Version : 0.5 Upstream Author : Sitaram Chamarty * URL : http://github.com/sitaramc/gitolite * License : GPLv2 Programming Lang: Perl Description : standalone, souped-up v

Re: Bug#550817: ITP: gitolite -- standalone, souped-up version of gitosis

2009-10-13 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi! * Stefano Zacchiroli [2009-10-13 11:03:00 CEST]: > What if one has no idea of what "gitosis" is? For such a person, the > above description will be close to meaningless. I suggest expanding in a > couple of words what gitosis is, turning the reference to it as > something like "simila

Re: Bug#550817: ITP: gitolite -- standalone, souped-up version of gitosis

2009-10-13 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:15:24AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Description : standalone, souped-up version of gitosis > > Gitolite is a rewrite of gitosis, with a completely different config > file that allows (at last!) access control down to the branch level, > including specifying who

Re: Experimental queue?

2009-10-13 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 02:22:28AM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: > * Do the autobuilders build packages uploaded as experimental? (eg: to > confirm a successful port) Yes, it works just like unstable but without the propogation and associated headaches. > * Is making an unstable upload really