Check if library has debug symbols

Hi there, I am trying to compile tulip (*) for debugging with: $ export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS='noopt debug nostrip' $ apt-get source tulip $ cd tulip-3.1.2 $ dpkg-buildpackage After installation, here is what objdump reveals (**). Does this means: 1. I did not export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS ? 2. There i

Re: Bug#559774: ITP: modem-cmd -- send arbitrary AT commands to your modem

Robert Millan wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 02:14:52AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 01:43 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: >>> Package: wnpp >>> Severity: wishlist >>> Owner: Robert Millan >>> >>> * Package name: modem-cmd >>> Version : 0.0.1 >>> Upstream Auth

Re: New Menu category Applictions/Multimedia

Le mardi 08 décembre 2009 à 08:29 +0800, Paul Wise a écrit : > LXDE is a new desktop I guess the maintainers have not yet had time to > add support for the Debian menu (see #517190 for more). Here is a > thread about it too: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/02/thrd2.html#00809 Since

Re: Bug#559761: ITP: release -- provides information about the current releases

On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:03:07AM +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > See http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases but I didn't/couldn't find the > information for bo/rex/buzz. Anyone ? has the information and a citation for buzz but not rex or bo. Ac

Re: New Menu category Applictions/Multimedia

> Personally I think we should have gotten rid of the Debian menu years > ago, I don't think my opinion is shared by many people in Debian > though. > It is truely kind of doubled effort to have the debian menu extra to the actual menu. The question is who will step forward and propose the remov

Re: Bug#559802: CVE-2009-3736 local privilege escalation

On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 03:13:06 +1100, Steffen Joeris wrote: > > > > The following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was > > > > published for libtool. I have determined that this package embeds a > > > > vulnerable copy of the libtool source code. However, since this is a > > > > mass bug

Bug#560043: ITP: libnfo -- an NFO file parser/writer library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org --- Please fill out the fields below. --- Package name: libnfo Version: 1.0.0 Upstream Author: Benjamin Zores URL: http://libnfo.geexbox.org License: LGPL v2 or later Description: an N

Re: New Menu category Applictions/Multimedia

I demand that Andreas Marschke may or may not have written... >> Personally I think we should have gotten rid of the Debian menu years >> ago, I don't think my opinion is shared by many people in Debian though. > It is truly kind of doubled effort to have the debian menu extra to the > actual me

Re: Check if library has debug symbols

On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 11:35:17AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Hi there, > > I am trying to compile tulip (*) for debugging with: > > $ export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS='noopt debug nostrip' > $ apt-get source tulip > $ cd tulip-3.1.2 > $ dpkg-buildpackage > > After installation, here is what ob

Bug#560047: ITP: libvalhalla -- a tiny media scanner library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org --- Please fill out the fields below. --- Package name: libvalhalla Version: 1.0.0 Upstream Author: Mathieu Schroeter, Benjamin Zores URL: http://libvalhalla.geexbox.org License: LGPL v2.1

Re: Bug#559802: CVE-2009-3736 local privilege escalation

On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 04:23:41 pm Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 03:13:06 +1100, Steffen Joeris wrote: > > > > > The following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was > > > > > published for libtool. I have determined that this package embeds > > > > > a vulnerable copy of the li

Bug#560048: ITP: libplayer -- a multimedia A/V abstraction layer API

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org --- Please fill out the fields below. --- Package name: libplayer Version: 1.0.0 Upstream Author: Benjamin Zores, Mathieu Schroeter URL: http://libplayer.geexbox.org License: LGPL v2.1 or l

Can quilt delete files?

Hi, I'm triing to package a little java library, which contains its own .jar and some pregenerated docs. These files should be regenerated on build time. So I'd like to have them removed by diff.gz Trying to generate an appropriate quilt patch failed. The only thing I came up with, was a patch

Re: Can quilt delete files?

Am Dienstag, den 08.12.2009, 16:56 +0100 schrieb Thomas Koch: > Hi, > > I'm triing to package a little java library, which contains its own .jar and > some pregenerated docs. These files should be regenerated on build time. So > I'd like to have them removed by diff.gz > Trying to generate an ap

Re: Can quilt delete files?

Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, > > I'm triing to package a little java library, which contains its own .jar and > some pregenerated docs. These files should be regenerated on build time. So > I'd like to have them removed by diff.gz > Trying to generate an appropriate quilt patch failed. The only thin

Re: Can quilt delete files?

Benjamin Drung wrote: > > Putting 'find . -name "*.jar" -delete' in you clean rule should do the > same job for you. > The *.jar files should not be present in the tarball. -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Can quilt delete files?

Am Dienstag, den 08.12.2009, 17:31 +0100 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy: > Thomas Koch wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm triing to package a little java library, which contains its own .jar > > and > > some pregenerated docs. These files should be regenerated on build time. So > > I'd like to have them removed

Re: Can quilt delete files?

> Benjamin Drung wrote: > > Putting 'find . -name "*.jar" -delete' in you clean rule should do the > > same job for you. > > The *.jar files should not be present in the tarball. As long as the jar file is the one created by the sourcecode in the tarball, I don't see a reason, that it needs to b

Re: Can quilt delete files?

On Tue Dec 08 17:42, Thomas Koch wrote: > As long as the jar file is the one created by the sourcecode in the tarball, > I > don't see a reason, that it needs to be removed and thus the upstream tarball > repackaged. No, but it is an option still. > Putting the deletion in the clean target cou

Re: Can quilt delete files?

On Tue Dec 08 16:56, Thomas Koch wrote: > Trying to generate an appropriate quilt patch failed. The only thing I came > up > with, was a patch that contains the whole content of the removed files with - > before every line. > Anybody more clever then me? No, you can't do it like that. Generally

Re: Can quilt delete files?

Thomas Koch wrote: > > As long as the jar file is the one created by the sourcecode in the tarball, > I > don't see a reason, that it needs to be removed and thus the upstream tarball > repackaged. Right. I missed that from your initial post. -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -

Re: Check if library has debug symbols

Michael Banck wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 11:35:17AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> I am trying to compile tulip (*) for debugging with: >> $ export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS='noopt debug nostrip' >> $ apt-get source tulip >> $ cd tulip-3.1.2 >> $ dpkg-buildpackage >> After installation, here

Re: Check if library has debug symbols

Michael Banck (08/12/2009): > DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip etc. is an optional feature as far as I > know, it is not guaranteed to work. You need to inspect > debian/rules and possibly modify it yourself if there is no support > for it currently. FWIW: dh_strip DTRT when DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains

Re: Can quilt delete files?

On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 16:56:05 +0100, Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, Hi Thomas, > I'm triing to package a little java library, which contains its own .jar > and some pregenerated docs. These files should be regenerated on build time. > So I'd like to have them removed by diff.gz As a general guideline,

Re: New Menu category Applictions/Multimedia

On Tue, Dec 08 2009, Andreas Marschke wrote: >> Personally I think we should have gotten rid of the Debian menu years >> ago, I don't think my opinion is shared by many people in Debian >> though. >> > > It is truely kind of doubled effort to have the debian menu extra to > the actual menu. The q

Retiring from Debian

Hi all, I am retiring from Debian due to a probably-permanent lack of time for Debian work. While having a new baby last month certainly didn't help with this, it did force me to admit it to myself ;-) My official packages are all orphaned as per Developers Ref. 3.7 & 5.9.4. Regarding unofficia

Bug#560088: ITP: python-portio -- low level port I/O for Linux

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dmitrijs Ledkovs * Package name: python-portio Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : Fabrizio Pollastri * URL : http://portio.inrim.it/ * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: Python, C Description : low level port I/O fo

Key signing

Hi all, I search for a Debian Member to sign my gpg key. I work in Paris. I live in Seine-et-Marne (77). Thanks in advance. Nicolas

Re: New Menu category Applictions/Multimedia

Manoj Srivastava writes: > Whoever does the work to implement the replacement menu > infrastructure in all the places that the Debian menu is > implemented. And also helps flush out all the entries missing from the > xdg menu which are in the Debian one. I think this would be excellen

Re: Key signing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nicolas schrieb: > Hi all, > > I search for a Debian Member to sign my gpg key. > I work in Paris. I live in Seine-et-Marne (77). > > Thanks in advance. > > Nicolas Have you already looked here [0]? [0]: https://nm.debian.org/gpg_offer.php - --

Re: Key signing

Nicolas wrote: > Hi all, > > I search for a Debian Member to sign my gpg key. > I work in Paris. I live in Seine-et-Marne (77). > See https://nm.debian.org/gpg_offer.php#FR -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Key signing

Hi, On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:57:56PM +0100, Nicolas wrote: > I search for a Debian Member to sign my gpg key. > I work in Paris. I live in Seine-et-Marne (77). (France) You should have a look at https://nm.debian.org/gpg_offer.php http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-french/ and #debian-devel-

Re: Key signing

Thanks. I have a look at that list but I think strange to "spam" people for requiring a signing key. No ? Is it the right process ? Nicolas 2009/12/8 Simon Paillard > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:57:56PM +0100, Nicolas wrote: > > I search for a Debian Member to sign my gpg key. > > I work

Re: Key signing

Nicolas (08/12/2009): > I have a look at that list but I think strange to "spam" people for > requiring a signing key. You're currently spamming -devel. > No ? Is it the right process ? People volunteered those bits of information. Guess why. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital si

O: libmtp8 -- Media Transfer Protocol (MTP) library

Package: libmtp8 Severity: normal http://packages.qa.debian.org/libm/libmtp.html Due to my real life problems and my limited free time, I want to set the libmtp package as orphan. I don't know if I have done it right, I followed the instructions at: http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ The package

O: libmtp8 -- Media Transfer Protocol (MTP) library

Package: libmtp8 Severity: normal Due to my real life problems and my limited free time, I want to set the libmtp package as orphan. I don't know if I have done it right, I followed the instructions at: http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ The package maintainer has already retired from maintaining

Bug#560102: ITP: libattica -- a Qt library that implements the Open Collaboration Services API

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thibaut Gridel * Package name: libattica Version : 0.1.1 Upstream Author : Eckhart Wörner , Frederik Gladhorn , Cornelius Schumacher * URL : ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/attica * License : LGPL2 Programming Lang:

Re: Bug#560088: ITP: python-portio -- low level port I/O for Linux

On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 08:23:15PM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > * Package name: python-portio > Version : 0.4 > Upstream Author : Fabrizio Pollastri > * URL : http://portio.inrim.it/ > * License : GPL-3+ > Programming Lang: Python, C > Description :

Re: Bug#560088: ITP: python-portio -- low level port I/O for Linux

On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 22:37 +, brian m. carlson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 08:23:15PM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > > * Package name: python-portio > > Version : 0.4 > > Upstream Author : Fabrizio Pollastri > > * URL : http://portio.inrim.it/ > > * License

Re: Bug#560088: ITP: python-portio -- low level port I/O for Linux

2009/12/8 Ben Hutchings : > I do hope not; this should never be used in production.  But it may yet > be useful in hardware development. > > Ben. > I'm working on a parallel LCD interface with my custom PCB and I wanted interactive way to use parallel port. Found this decided to package it for mys

Re: Bug#559761: ITP: release -- provides information about the current releases

Am Montag, den 07.12.2009, 09:03 +0100 schrieb Frank Lin PIAT: > On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 00:14 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > > > * Package name: release > > The tool isn't about releasing, but about to querying the release. Also, > it's about distribution release (not package...). May be a n

Re: New Menu category Applictions/Multimedia

Le mardi 08 décembre 2009 à 11:30 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : > Whoever does the work to implement the replacement menu > infrastructure in all the places that the Debian menu is > implemented. And also helps flush out all the entries missing from the > xdg menu which are in the Debian on

Re: Bug#559761: ITP: release -- provides information about the current releases

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Am Montag, den 07.12.2009, 09:03 +0100 schrieb Frank Lin PIAT: >> On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 00:14 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: >> > For Debian I need some informations: Until when were following >> > releases supported: buzz, rex, bo, hamm, slink

Re: Bug#559761: ITP: release -- provides information about the current releases

On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:07:59AM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Yes, the name is a bit to generic. Any other suggestions for the name? > On the mailing list I found 'release-info'. On my list are now: > > * release-info That sound appropriate to me. > Should i rename the scripts, too? I don't

Re: Bug#560088: ITP: python-portio -- low level port I/O for Linux

On 2009-12-08 17:42, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: 2009/12/8 Ben Hutchings : I do hope not; this should never be used in production. But it may yet be useful in hardware development. Ben. I'm working on a parallel LCD interface with my custom PCB and I wanted interactive way to use parallel port.

Re: cupt, the APT competitor

On 2009-09-28 14:28, Free Ekanayaka wrote: Hi, |--==> On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:52:14 +0300, "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" said: EVL> This mail is to inform that Debian APT suite now has a competitor named Cupt [1]. For the ones who don't know it, I'd like to point out that there is at least one oth