Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: libspring-richclient-java
Version: 1.1.0
Upstream Author: The spring-richclient team
(http://spring-rich-c.sourceforge.net/1.1.0/team-list.html)
URL: http://spring-rich-c.sourceforge.n
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: libl2fprod-common-java
Version: 7.3
Upstream Author: L2FProd.com
URL: http://www.l2fprod.com/common/
License: Apache 2.0
Description: L2FProd.com Common Components - moder
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: libjreleaseinfo-java
Version: 1.3.0
Upstream Author: http://jreleaseinfo.sourceforge.net/team-list.html
URL: http://jreleaseinfo.sourceforge.net/
License: Apache 2.0
Descri
On Sonntag, 24. Januar 2010, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Or am I missing something?
> It's not a bug in 'cat' that you can invoke it from a maintainer script in
> a way that violates the policy on user interaction.
Right, thanks.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 01:09:38AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Samstag, 23. Januar 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> > > *** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf,
> > > but the script did not pass --debconf-ok to uc
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 01:09:38AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Samstag, 23. Januar 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> > *** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf,
> > but the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer script
> > should be fixed to no
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
The old maintainer of purple-plugin-pack, Benjamin Seidenberg, is
apparently not active anymore. The currently packaged version is from
November 2007 (uploaded in March 2008).
In July 2009 I packaged a new version of purple-plugin-pack and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com>
* Package name: freehep-graphicsio-tests
Version : 2.1.1
Upstream Author : The FreeHEP team
* URL : http://java.freehep.org/
* License : LGPL-2.1+
Programming Lang: java
Descripti
Hi,
On Samstag, 23. Januar 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> *** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf,
> but the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer script
> should be fixed to not stop debconf before calling ucf, and pass it this
> parameter. Fo
On Fri,22.Jan.10, 10:11:45, Ben Finney wrote:
> Charles Plessy writes:
> > sometimes degrades our relations with Upstream, and I have not yet
> > seen a user thanking us for doing this.
>
> I've often expressly, and in public, thanked the specific people who put
> forth efforts to ensure free so
tags 559814 + help
thanks
I'm looking for advice / testers for #559814 (one of the dreaded
"vulnerable embedded copy of ltdl").
The bug is against hamlib, which is orphaned but has at least one binary
package with high popcon (about 300).
The bug seems to be fixed with new upstream release 1.2.1
found 513142 1.8.42
tags 513142 - unreproducible
notfixed 513142
thanks
I wish the line below,
Please inform the package maintainer about this problem.
would say which package it is talking about. Or at least it could say
"don't tell the maintainers of x y and z'.
Setting up dbconfig-comm
http://35.9.37.225/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-amd64/ show this
mirror hasn't updated since the 19th, but its still in the
http.us.debian.org rotation.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi
On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 12:53 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:50:38 +0100
> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:18:57AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > Just out of interest, what's the difference between doc-central and
> > > dwww ?
> >
> > That's a p
Le Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:00:25PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> I find this request of yours unsubstantiated.
>
> The RC bug has a patch pending and is pretty easy to fix. I might
> eventually NMU it to fix that, even though I'm not willing to maintain
> the package right now. Beside tha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thorsten Glaser
* Package name: kwalletcli
Version : 2.01
Upstream Author : Thorsten Glaser
* URL : https://www.mirbsd.org/kwalletcli.htm
* License : Code MirOS, Logo LGPL
Programming Lang: C, C++, mksh
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jakub Wilk
* Package name: uncertainties
Version : 1.2.2
Upstream Author : Eric O. LEBIGOT
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/uncertainties/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: Python
Description : transparent c
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 08:08:03PM +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> This seems like a Debian related discussion. But as the author of
> GNU Pth I can at least say that I've never heard of "pthsem"
> myself (if I received any email, then, sorry, it seems it was
> filtered by the anti-spam stuff)
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:50:38 +0100
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:18:57AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Just out of interest, what's the difference between doc-central and
> > dwww ?
>
> That's a pretty damn good question :-)
>
> I've made the choice between dwww and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: dropbox
Version: 0.7.97
Upstream Author: Dropbox
URL: http://www.dropbox.com/
License: freeware (AS IS), close source
Description
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:18:57AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> Just out of interest, what's the difference between doc-central and
> dwww ?
That's a pretty damn good question :-)
I've made the choice between dwww and doc-central several years
ago. _IIRC_ , back then dwww was missing decent bro
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:00:25 +0100
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> The RC bug has a patch pending and is pretty easy to fix. I might
> eventually NMU it to fix that, even though I'm not willing to maintain
> the package right now. Beside that bug, the package works quite well,
> has a respectable nu
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 04:12:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> doc-central has one release-critical bug, making it unfit for the release. Are
> there volunteers to adopt it? Robert? The QA team? Otherwise, despite it is
> useful, it is maybe time to give up and remove it from our archive...
I f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Hommey
* Package name: dehydra
Version : 0.9.hg20100123
Upstream Author : Mozilla Corporation
* URL : https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Dehydra
* License : GPL2+
Programming Lang: C, C++, JS, tiny bits of python
D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Eric Lavarde
* Package name: freeplane
Version : 1.0.38
Upstream Author : Dimitri Polivaev
* URL : http://freeplane.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : A Mind Mapping software written in Ja
25 matches
Mail list logo
