Bug#569521: ITP: groundcontrol -- Launchpad integration for Nautilus

2010-02-11 Thread Luke Faraone
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Luke Faraone * Package name: groundcontrol Version : 1.4 Upstream Author : Martin Owens * URL : https://launchpad.net/groundcontrol * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: Python Description : Launchpad integration

Bug#569519: ITP: groundcontrol -- Launchpad integration for Nautilus

2010-02-11 Thread Luke Faraone
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Luke Faraone * Package name: groundcontrol Version : 1.4 Upstream Author : Martin Owens * URL : https://launchpad.net/groundcontrol * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: Python Description : Launchpad integration

initial packages with multiarch paths

2010-02-11 Thread Simon McVittie
While trying to prepare a multiarch version of libdbus I received some conflicting advice about how much of the multiarch proposal is already allowed by Policy, so I've prepared a multiarch version of a rather simpler library (libgfshare) as a starting point. Does this look OK for upload to experi

Bug#569501: ITP: haskell-happstack -- Haskell web application stack

2010-02-11 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Owner: mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it Package name: haskell-happstack Version: 0.4.1 Upstream Author: Happstack team URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/happstack License: BSD Descr

Bug#569508: ITP: haskell-hsx -- Haskell support for XML in source code

2010-02-11 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Owner: mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it Package name: haskell-hsx Version: 0.6.1 Upstream Author: Niklas Broberg URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hsx License: BSD Description: Has

Re: debian/rules clean as root or non-root?

2010-02-11 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jan Hauke Rahm writes: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 07:42:37AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Sven Joachim writes: >> >> > On 2010-02-10 21:37 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> > >> >> Sven Joachim writes: >> >> >> >>> On 2010-02-10 19:02 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> >>> >> >>

Re: debian/rules clean as root or non-root?

2010-02-11 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Sven Joachim wrote: > Why would anyone want to run the build target as root? If you do that, > even running the clean target as root might not give you a state where > you can build the package as a normal user again. Because there was a time when fakeroot didn't work on some architectures and th

Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-02-11 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi all I can now announce an "half official" statement from Kir (who is the project manager of openvz) that they are now dedicated to make a openvz. This is what he states: - Hi Ola, guys, Thanks for the info. We have discussed this at length and the resolution is we are all for it.

Re: libqt3-mt-dev: Depends: libjpeg62-dev but it is not going to be installed

2010-02-11 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-02-10 18:58 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 06:14:22PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: >> Actually, libjpeg62-dev is needed to build LSB compliant software that use >> libjpeg, so losing that would not be very nice. > > Well, what I suggest: > > I rename the current binar

RE : RE : init script verbosity

2010-02-11 Thread PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel
On my system VERBOSE=no and I never touch it. and there is plenty of log even with this default. See you Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RE  : init script verbosity

2010-02-11 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:41:00 +0100, PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > > This would lead to messages from the script to show up during boot > > even when the 'quiet' boot is requested and no error occured, which I > > believe is a bad idea. > ok but for now even with quiet I have plenty of init scri

RE : RE : init script verbosity

2010-02-11 Thread PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel
thanks > Or setting it in /etc/default/rcS, from `man rcS`: > VERBOSE > Setting this option to no (in lower case) will make the > boot process a bit less verbose. Setting this option > to yes will make the boot process a bit more verbose. so pl

RE : init script verbosity

2010-02-11 Thread PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel
>> so I need to use VERBOSE=yes in my script to override the vars.sh >> values. > This would lead to messages from the script to show up during boot > even when the 'quiet' boot is requested and no error occured, which I > believe is a bad idea. ok but for now even with quiet I have plenty of ini

Re: RE : init script verbosity

2010-02-11 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:03:57 +0100, PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:48:48 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: >> [PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel] >>> so what must I do for my init scripts. VERBOSITY / no VERBOSITY ? >> >> Use the VERBOSE to decide when to print informative

Re: init script verbosity

2010-02-11 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel] > I know nothing about all this except that it would be nice to see > the messages when started interactively by the user with the > invoke-rc.d command I agree, and I expect it will be fixed for Squeeze. > so I need to use VERBOSE=yes in my script to override the vars.sh

RE : init script verbosity

2010-02-11 Thread PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel
[PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel] > I am using the /etc/init.d/skeleton (from unstable) file to write my > package init scripts. > but it seems that the lsb-base default behaviour is to have VERBOSE=no > so there is no output. > I believe this is a good default for the boot, and less good for > package i

Re: init script verbosity

2010-02-11 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel] > I am using the /etc/init.d/skeleton (from unstable) file to write my > package init scripts. > but it seems that the lsb-base default behaviour is to have VERBOSE=no > so there is no output. I believe this is a good default for the boot, and less good for package insta

Re: Relying on glib to publish gettext linker flags

2010-02-11 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Zitat von Daniel Macks : Coming here for wider input from gnome bugzilla Bug #606977 (and now I'm rethinking the much older Bug #500137), which seems to center on the line in glib-2.0.pc.in: Libs: -L${libdir} -lglib-2.0 @INTLLIBS@ [...] This is a real issue for me on OS X, since gettext is

Bug#569291: ITP: libalgorithm-fuzzycmeans-perl -- perl implementation of Fuzzy c-means clustering

2010-02-11 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bas Zoetekouw * Package name: libalgorithm-fuzzycmeans-perl Version : 0.02 Upstream Author : Mizuki Fujisawa * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~fujisawa/Algorithm-FuzzyCmeans-0.02 * License : same as Perl Programming Lang

Re: Re: why are the watchdog drivers blacklisted?

2010-02-11 Thread Michael Meskes
> If you want to test forking ability just enable test-binary test without > giving > it a test-binary or use an empty one. This will make watchdog fork() and react > if not possible. Thinking about this some more, the test for an emtpy test-binary is done *after* the fork, so it should find the

Re: Relying on glib to publish gettext linker flags

2010-02-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: > I'd love to get this resolved so I know whether to bother filing bugs > when I find "uses gettext but doesn't specify direct link against it" > and if there is a consensus on how other packages should handle it. I read on LWN recently that F

Re: debian/rules clean as root or non-root?

2010-02-11 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 07:42:37AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Sven Joachim writes: > > > On 2010-02-10 21:37 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > >> Sven Joachim writes: > >> > >>> On 2010-02-10 19:02 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >>> > I often see sources where debian/