Bug#575667: ITP: mojarra -- JavaServer Faces (JSF) 2.0 Java API classes

2010-03-27 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Miguel Landaeta * Package name: mojarra Version : 2.0.2 Upstream Author : Sun Microsystems Inc. * URL : https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/ * License : GPL2+, CDDL-1.0 Programming Lang: Java Description : JavaSe

Re: About new source formats for packages without patches

2010-03-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > If what you care about is the format used by *new* packages, I think you > should focus on making sure the templates maintainers are using (such as > dh-make) set the desired default explicitly.  That would have an *immediate* > payoff...

Re: About new source formats for packages without patches

2010-03-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 09:25:38AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Neil Williams wrote: > > Now all I need is for dpkg to accept that the absence of > > debian/source/format is declarative of source format 1.0. > That's the case _for now_. > > packages don't need to be chan

Re: Serializing transitions

2010-03-27 Thread Michael Banck
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:37:59PM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > Hi! > > Neil Williams schrieb: > > >Wouldn't a simpler method be to identify uploads that inadvertently > >impair an ongoing transition and bump that one upload to experimental > >or simply tell the DD not to upload to u

Re: Serializing transitions

2010-03-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 03:11:12PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > > You mean like the existing pages on buildd.debian.org? You just need to > > feed them the list of affected packages to get that. > > Good if it can be done with a simple link t

Re: About new source formats for packages without patches

2010-03-27 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 09:28:58PM +, Neil Williams wrote: > Again from Wouter's comments: > "It is of course perfectly fine for dpkg-source to error out if it > detects that things are not completely in order, or if it detects that > features were requested that are not supported with the sour

Re: migration to testing

2010-03-27 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Mike Hommey] > There is a general problem with fuse, actually. fuse-utils is needed by > any program using libfuse and allowing users (i.e not root) to mount a > filesystem: In this case, libfuse uses fusemount to do the mount, since > mount(2) is unfortunately a CAP_SYS_ADMIN syscall, and fusemo

Bug#575598: ITP: libfusioninventory-agent-task-ocsdeploy-perl -- OCS Inventory Software Deployment support for FusionInventory

2010-03-27 Thread Gonéri Le Bouder
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Gonéri Le Bouder" Owner: "Gonéri Le Bouder" * Package name: libfusioninventory-agent-task-ocsdeploy-perl Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : Gonéri Le Bouder * URL : http://www.FusionInventory.org/ * License : GPLv2+

Re: migration to testing

2010-03-27 Thread Mike Hommey
Cc'ing to -devel, as it is a more general problem and I'd like to hear feedback from other fellow developers. On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:05:37PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:16:58PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: > > One of my packages, fuse-convmvfs (uploaded by a

Re: Serializing transitions

2010-03-27 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Stéphane Glondu writes: > Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >> I don't an exhaustive answer but here are some points: >> 1/ you can't request bin-nmus of reverse-dependencies in experimental >>(to verify that all packages build fine with the updated package, and >>that's one of the main task in pr

Re: Serializing transitions

2010-03-27 Thread Neil Williams
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:09:53 +0100 Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > 3/ some maintainers are too confident that nothing is going to break > > And even if they do tests, they cannot do them on all architectures. With edos-debcheck you can. You simply need to download the relevant Packages.gz file. edos

Re: Testing upgrade Failures:

2010-03-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:29 AM, JW Foster wrote: > I just tried to do an upgrade on testing & I,m getting several errors. > First snip of output is regarding unknown types. I have no idea what > this is but I seen it before. ... > Unknown media type in type 'chemical/x-alchemy' ... Found via G