Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

Zitat von Jay Berkenbilt : Merciadri Luca wrote: Sjoerd Hardeman wrote: Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them, never. And what do you suggest if one wants some real protection _and_ the benefits of a format like PDF? Thanks. The PDF specification itself recommends usi

Re: What does .d at the end of some dirctory and filenames actually stand for?

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 02:20:52PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: [...] > The most common convention adopted was to permit including a directory > full of configuration files, where anything dropped into that directory > would become active and part of that configuration. As that convention > became m

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

Merciadri Luca wrote: > Sjoerd Hardeman wrote: >> Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them, never. > And what do you suggest if one wants some real protection _and_ the > benefits of a format like PDF? Thanks. The PDF specification itself recommends using external encryption in

Bug#578454: ITP: php-ogr -- OGR module for php5

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Neskie Manuel * Package name: php-ogr Version : 1.1.1 Upstream Author : Alan Boudreault * URL : http://dl.maptools.org/dl/php_ogr/ * License : other Programming Lang: PHP Description : OGR module for php5 This

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

Gunnar Wolf writes: > Russ Allbery dijo [Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 02:14:21PM -0700]: >> I think people are not understanding why users use this feature in some >> environments. >> >> Yes, sometimes it's a misguided attempt at DRM, but I've more often seen >> it inside a workplace as defense in depth

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

Russ Allbery dijo [Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 02:14:21PM -0700]: > I think people are not understanding why users use this feature in some > environments. > > Yes, sometimes it's a misguided attempt at DRM, but I've more often seen > it inside a workplace as defense in depth against *mistakes*. One mig

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

Merciadri Luca dijo [Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 05:32:51PM +0200]: > > Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them, never. > And what do you suggest if one wants some real protection _and_ the > benefits of a format like PDF? Thanks. Thing is, PDF is a printing-oriented format. It is a cl

Re: What does .d at the end of some dirctory and filenames actually stand for?

19.04.2010 17:42, derdavid1...@gmx.de пишет: > "What does .d at the end of some dirctory and filenames actually stand > for?" This is for .directory with included files, and nothing else. /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ extends sources.list . You can find "include /etc/xinitd.d" in xinetd configuration

Re: What does .d at the end of some dirctory and filenames actually stand for?

"spamfuerda...@gmx.de" writes: > I (and some other people) are wondering about the question: > "What does .d at the end of some dirctory and filenames actually stand for?" > It does not mean deamon or default. > Does it maybe mean directory? Probably not, cause there are files named > "x.d" to

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

Mikhail Gusarov writes: > Twas brillig at 17:32:51 19.04.2010 UTC+02 when > luca.mercia...@student.ulg.ac.be did gyre and gimble: > >> Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them, never. > ML> And what do you suggest if one wants some real protection _and_ the > ML> benefits of

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bernd Eckenfels writes: > In article <4bcc77a3.9080...@student.ulg.ac.be> you wrote: >> And what do you suggest if one wants some real protection _and_ the >> benefits of a format like PDF? Thanks. > > It is simply not possible to publish something a

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sorry, my last message was actually rejected by the moderation robot (if this is a robot). Vincent Danjean writes: > On 19/04/2010 17:32, Merciadri Luca wrote: >> Sjoerd Hardeman wrote: >>> Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them,

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sven Arvidsson writes: > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 15:52 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote: >> Thanks. I assume that this is for the same reason as Mr. Williams >> pointed out. Are _all_ the free PDF viewers running under Debian in >> accordance with this prin

Bug#578421: virtual-packages: Retire java-compiler, java2-compiler and java-virtual-machine

Package: debian-policy Version: 3.8.4.0 Severity: wishlist Justification: Policy §3.6 X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi As of today[1], the Java Policy retired the use of the virtual packages mentioned in the subject line, which brings

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

In article <4bcc77a3.9080...@student.ulg.ac.be> you wrote: > And what do you suggest if one wants some real protection _and_ the > benefits of a format like PDF? Thanks. It is simply not possible to publish something and protect it. The best protection in that case is reputation. Gruss Bernd --

Bug#578411: ITP: libmusicbrainz-discid-perl -- Perl interface to the MusicBrainz libdiscid library

Package: wnpp Owner: Jonathan Yu Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libmusicbrainz-discid-perl Version : 0.03 Upstream Author : Nicholas J. Humfrey * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/MusicBrainz

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 15:52 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote: > Thanks. I assume that this is for the same reason as Mr. Williams > pointed out. Are _all_ the free PDF viewers running under Debian in > accordance with this principle? At least Evince can be convinced to provide this "feature", if you to

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:39:03PM +0700, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > > Twas brillig at 17:32:51 19.04.2010 UTC+02 when > luca.mercia...@student.ulg.ac.be did gyre and gimble: > > >> Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them, never. > ML> And what do you suggest if one wants some

Re: What does .d at the end of some dirctory and filenames actually stand for?

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 03:51:14PM +0200, spamfuerda...@gmx.de wrote: > Hi! > > I (and some other people) are wondering about the question: > > "What does .d at the end of some dirctory and filenames actually stand for?" > > > It does not mean deamon or default. > > Does it maybe mean director

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

On 19/04/2010 17:32, Merciadri Luca wrote: > Sjoerd Hardeman wrote: >> Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them, never. > And what do you suggest if one wants some real protection _and_ the > benefits of a format like PDF? Thanks. If you have free software (ie software you have t

Re: What does .d at the end of some dirctory and filenames actually stand for?

On 04/19/2010 03:51 PM, spamfuerda...@gmx.de wrote: "What does .d at the end of some dirctory and filenames actually stand for?" it stands for 'directory'. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet:

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

Twas brillig at 17:32:51 19.04.2010 UTC+02 when luca.mercia...@student.ulg.ac.be did gyre and gimble: >> Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them, never. ML> And what do you suggest if one wants some real protection _and_ the ML> benefits of a format like PDF? Thanks. There

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

Sjoerd Hardeman wrote: > Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them, never. And what do you suggest if one wants some real protection _and_ the benefits of a format like PDF? Thanks. -- Merciadri Luca See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/ I use PGP. If there is a

Bug#578387: ITP: log4cplus -- C++ logging API modeled after the Java log4j API

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Daigo Moriwaki * Package name: log4cplus Version : 1.0.3 Upstream Author : Tad E. Smith * URL : http://log4cplus.sourceforge.net * License : Apache, BSD Programming Lang: C++ Description : C++ logging API modele

Re: dash Debian package - RC bugs

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:41:03PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > Why are you not using alioth for this? It's less work for me, I haven't used alioth before. Regards, Gerrit. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list

Re: Light automatically and randomly reduces some secs. after it has been set to its maximum level

Hi, On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 03:32:47PM +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote: > As stated in the title, the light on my Asus EEE 1000HE automatically > and randomly reduces some seconds after I have set it to its maximum > level. Why? That must be for some energy reason, but I would like to > deactivate thi

What does .d at the end of some dirctory and filenames actually stand for?

Hi! I (and some othere people) are wondering about the question: "What does .d at the end of some dirctory and filenames actually stand for?" It does not mean deamon or default. Does it maybe mean directory? Probably not, cause there are files named "x.d" too. There is no information abou

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

I Rattan wrote: > > > On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Merciadri Luca wrote: > > yes. Thanks. I assume that this is for the same reason as Mr. Williams pointed out. Are _all_ the free PDF viewers running under Debian in accordance with this principle? -- Merciadri Luca See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.a

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

Neil Williams wrote: > On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:31:30 +0200 > Merciadri Luca wrote: > > > > Anti-features like locking and password protection are not supported > and, if implemented, could make the free software tools appear non-free > by restricting the functionality available to the user. In t

What does .d at the end of some dirctory and filenames actually stand for?

Hi! I (and some other people) are wondering about the question: "What does .d at the end of some dirctory and filenames actually stand for?" It does not mean deamon or default. Does it maybe mean directory? Probably not, cause there are files named "x.d" too. There is no information about t

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:31:30 +0200 Merciadri Luca wrote: > Hi, > > I have written a PDF that I have blocked for printing, etc. Acrobat > Reader won't print it, because of the restrictions defined on the PDF > file's content. However, KPDF accepts printing it, and extracting > content from it, et

Light automatically and randomly reduces some secs. after it has been set to its maximum level

Hi, As stated in the title, the light on my Asus EEE 1000HE automatically and randomly reduces some seconds after I have set it to its maximum level. Why? That must be for some energy reason, but I would like to deactivate this feature, or at least to modify the timer between the action I do, and

PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

Hi, I have written a PDF that I have blocked for printing, etc. Acrobat Reader won't print it, because of the restrictions defined on the PDF file's content. However, KPDF accepts printing it, and extracting content from it, etc., even if these actions are unauthorized with acroread. Is it normal?