I won't comment on the main issue since other people gave you the
solution.
On dim., 2010-08-08 at 16:45 +0300, Zvi Dubitzky wrote:
> I need to generate a Debian package for a library
> As an exercise I tried it with libvirt .
Note that libvirt is already packaged so you can inspire you of th
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 21:01 -0400, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Ben Hutchings (09/08/2010):
> > This information belongs in the release notes. I'm not sure where
> > one should look to see the draft release notes for the next release.
>
> Sounds like it?
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/re
Ben Hutchings (09/08/2010):
> This information belongs in the release notes. I'm not sure where
> one should look to see the draft release notes for the next release.
Sounds like it?
http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Zvi Dubitzky writes:
> I need to generate a Debian package for a library
> As an exercise I tried it with libvirt .
> I am running a Ubuntu 8.10 . and use the libvirt.0.6.1 tar.gz
This might sound rude but since you are using Ubuntu all around why
don't you ask them for help?
> For the lib
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jeremy Lainé
* Package name: qxmpp
Upstream Author : Manjeet Dahiya
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/qxmpp/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : cross-platform C++ XMPP library
QXmpp is a cross-platform C+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
This email has 2 goals:
1/ Let you know about my past work
2/ Ask for help for packaging swfupload
Because it has been said many times in Debconf that we should tell about
things we do in Debian, I decided to write a quite long email, so
Malte Forkel writes:
> lately, I created two packages that do little more than wrap software
> written in a scripting language (one Java, one Perl) so I could put them
> in a local repository for easy installation and deinstallation.
> In both cases, I expect upstream versions to change often. S
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 08:54:16PM +0200, Sebastian Krause wrote:
> Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > I am pretty sure porting is doable and I think I can volunteer to do
> > this. But before it, let us collect more opinions. It would be nice to
> > know what does the release team think about it. BTW
Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> I am pretty sure porting is doable and I think I can volunteer to do
> this. But before it, let us collect more opinions. It would be nice to
> know what does the release team think about it. BTW, suboptimal
> subpixel rendering of fonts in Debian is one of the reasons
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 08:31:53PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 07:13 PM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > I am pretty sure porting is doable and I think I can volunteer to do
> > this. But before it, let us collect more opinions. It would be nice to
> > know what does the release team
On 08/09/2010 07:13 PM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> I am pretty sure porting is doable and I think I can volunteer to do
> this. But before it, let us collect more opinions. It would be nice to
> know what does the release team think about it. BTW, suboptimal
> subpixel rendering of fonts in Debia
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: NeuroDebian team
* Package name: spm8
Version : 8.4010
Upstream Author : Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging
* URL : http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm8/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Matlab/Octave
On lun., 2010-08-09 at 21:13 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> BTW, suboptimal
> subpixel rendering of fonts in Debian is one of the reasons why many
> desktop users switch to other distros.
Is it?
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 05:22:27PM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 18:27 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > Thus, getting to the main point of this long e-mail: what are we going
> > to do with libcairo2 in squeeze? If we keep it at 1.8.10, I think it
> > makes sense to app
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 18:27 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> plain text document attachment (libcairo2 in squeeze & subpixel
> rendering.eml)
> Hi debian-devel,
>
> As we all know, squeeze is frozen now. This was a long awaited event,
> although for some importans software that we have in the d
Hello,
lately, I created two packages that do little more than wrap software
written in a scripting language (one Java, one Perl) so I could put them
in a local repository for easy installation and deinstallation.
In both cases, I expect upstream versions to change often. So I will
probably find
On 8/9/2010 9:36 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Michel]
I don't know where is the work on upgrade documentation but I wanted
underline this order.
At least the udev issue is known to me. It can be worked around by
touching /etc/udev/kernel-upgrade before upgrading udev, allowing the
kernel a
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 06:27:01PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> Thus, getting to the main point of this long e-mail: what are we going
> to do with libcairo2 in squeeze? If we keep it at 1.8.10, I think it
> makes sense to apply the above mentioned patch, because it has been
> accepted by up
[Michel]
> I don't know where is the work on upgrade documentation but I wanted
> underline this order.
At least the udev issue is known to me. It can be worked around by
touching /etc/udev/kernel-upgrade before upgrading udev, allowing the
kernel and udev to be upgraded at the same time and with
Hi debian-devel,
As we all know, squeeze is frozen now. This was a long awaited event,
although for some importans software that we have in the distro it
would be beneficial if this moment could happen later. One of such
examples is libcairo2.
The last release by ustream [1] is 1.8.10. At the mom
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thorsten Glaser
* Package name: ejabberd-mod-shared-roster-ldap
Version : 0.5.1
Upstream Author : Marcin Owsiany
* URL : https://alioth.debian.org/projects/ejabberd-msrl/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Erlang
Desc
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 02:06:18PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 15:00 +0200, Michel wrote:
> This information belongs in the release notes. I'm not sure where one
> should look to see the draft release notes for the next release.
I guess its already known: #549573
Its
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 15:00 +0200, Michel wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I have upgrade my Debian Lenny to Debian Squeeze and I don't know if
> it's only on my case but Imust upgrade grub, linux-image (2.6.26 to
> 2.6.32) and udev in this order.
>
>
> grub before linux-image because linux-image-2.6.32 d
Hello,
I have upgrade my Debian Lenny to Debian Squeeze and I don't know if it's
only on my case but Imust upgrade grub, linux-image (2.6.26 to 2.6.32) and
udev in this order.
grub before linux-image because linux-image-2.6.32 don't upgrade
/boot/grub/menu.list
linux-image before udev because ude
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 02:08:28PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> OK, so would a debhelper patch implementing this be accepted?
Hardly so, as long as the patch is theoretical and discussed on -devel,
where not necessarily will get the attention of debhelper maintainer.
I suggest following the usua
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fathi Boudra
* Package name: meego-packaging-tools
Version : 0.5.1
Upstream Author : Intel Corp.
* URL : http://repo.meego.com/MeeGo/builds/trunk/
* License : LGPL-2.1
Programming Lang: Python and shell script
Descrip
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fathi Boudra
* Package name: spectacle
Version : 0.18
Upstream Author : Intel Corporation
* URL : http://meego.gitorious.org/meego-developer-tools/spectacle
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: Python
Description :
27 matches
Mail list logo
