Re: Debian Project Leader Elections 2011: Call for votes

2011-04-01 Thread David Paleino
Hi Paul, On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:09:02 +1300, Paul Waite wrote: > Debian wrote: > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 0942471d-23ab-4b5e-b5a8-02c2e74cb588 > > [ x ] Choice 1: Stefano Zacchiroli > > [ ] Choice 2: None Of The Above > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Do

Bug#620464: ITP: pygossip -- distributed domain reputation service

2011-04-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Scott Kitterman * Package name: pygossip Version : 0.5 Upstream Author : Stuart Gathman * URL : http://pymilter.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: Python Description : distributed domain reputat

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections 2011: Call for votes

2011-04-01 Thread Paul Waite
Debian wrote: > Hi, > > It seems I made a error in the first mail. The correct ballot > to reply to is: > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 0942471d-23ab-4b5e-b5a8-02c2e74cb588 > [ x ] Choice 1: Stefano Zacchiroli > [ ] Choice 2: None Of The Above >

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections 2011: Call for votes

2011-04-01 Thread Paul Waite
Debian wrote: > Hi, > > It seems I made a error in the first mail. The correct ballot > to reply to is: > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 0942471d-23ab-4b5e-b5a8-02c2e74cb588 > [ x ] Choice 1: Stefano Zacchiroli > [ ] Choice 2: None Of The Above >

Call for Testing: Unofficial Debian Monthly Testing Snapshot Release Candidate (version 2011.04rc1)

2011-04-01 Thread Michael Gilbert
Hi, I am pleased to announce the unofficial Debian monthly testing snapshot release candidate for April 2011. This release is currently available in two flavors, i386 and amd64, as mini iso images (16 MiB each) downloadable from: http://alioth.debian.org/~gilbert-guest/snapshots/2011.04/debian-tes

invitation : meeting d'affaire

2011-04-01 Thread said etebbai
Rencontrer d'autres chefs d'entreprises Prospectez de nouvelles opportunités d'affaires ! L'association « Le Maroc Positif » vous invite à la 1ere Rencontre des chefs d'entreprises (200 décideurs sont invités) pour échanger directement entre eux leurs besoins et leurs offres ; ceci le 14 Avri

Re: mlton any->all package transition breakage

2011-04-01 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > The problem there is you're trying to install and/or upgrade the sid one, > > not the squeeze one. > > No, the squeeze package installed cleanly. now apt-get update && > upgrade breaks. That means the package is buggy. > Yes, I know i

Re: mlton any->all package transition breakage

2011-04-01 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > all the other chroots are now fucked because we did as you asked, and > > for some reason it wants to bring in mlton-doc > > > The problem there is you're trying to install and/or upgr

Re: mlton any->all package transition breakage

2011-04-01 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote: > all the other chroots are now fucked because we did as you asked, and > for some reason it wants to bring in mlton-doc The problem there is you're trying to install and/or upgrade the sid one, not the squeeze one. > I think we won't be

Re: mlton any->all package transition breakage

2011-04-01 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: > I request the above packages to be installed on these machines: > albeniz.debian.org alpha 8g y > abel.debian.org armel 1.5gy > merulo.debian.org ia648g y > asdfasdf.debian.net kfr

Re: dh_shlibdeps warnings concerning undefined OpenMP symbols

2011-04-01 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Vincent Danjean , 2011-04-01, 14:38: AC_OPENMP() macro documentation looks to be a bit incomplete (e.g. if it provides $OPENMP_LDFLAGS I wouldn't mess things), Please, report a bug for this macro if it is provided by another package. I don't think there's anything wrong with this macro. CX

Re: Bug#510415: Call for votes on Bug#510415: tech-ctte: Qmail inclusion (or not) in Debian

2011-04-01 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011, Mark Hymers wrote: > On Tue, 29, Mar, 2011 at 08:14:21AM -0700, Don Armstrong spoke thus.. > > What is the current status of this? > > I've just checked the packages, and given the constraints of #510415, I > have accepted netqmail, dot-forward, fastforward, qmail-run and > qm

Re: /run support for wheezy?

2011-04-01 Thread Roger Leigh
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 04:06:16PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: > Hi there! > > On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:33:44 +0200, Roger Leigh wrote: > > Patches filed against base-files and initscripts in #620157 and #620191. > > Test packages here: http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/run/ > > (tested in an amd64

Re: /run support for wheezy?

2011-04-01 Thread Roger Leigh
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 02:33:44PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:20:45PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:32:51PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > Tollef Fog Heen writes: > > > > > > > ]] Julien Cristau > > > > > > > > | On Wed, Mar 30, 20

Re: /run support for wheezy?

2011-04-01 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:33:44 +0200, Roger Leigh wrote: > Patches filed against base-files and initscripts in #620157 and #620191. > Test packages here: http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/run/ > (tested in an amd64 kvm VM; it shouldn't toast your system by > making it unbootable, but YM

Re: /run support for wheezy?

2011-04-01 Thread Roger Leigh
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:20:45PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:32:51PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Tollef Fog Heen writes: > > > > > ]] Julien Cristau > > > > > > | On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 16:20:10 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > | > > > | > Given that Fedo

Re: oldstable-security signing key

2011-04-01 Thread Mark Hymers
On Sat, 26, Mar, 2011 at 09:02:46AM +, Mark Hymers spoke thus.. > If anyone has any objections to this, can they let us know? I intend to > implement the changes necessary to make this work in dak immediately, > but won't change the key over for a couple of days to give people time > to raise

Re: dh_shlibdeps warnings concerning undefined OpenMP symbols

2011-04-01 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 01/04/2011 10:21, Dmitry Katsubo wrote: > On 31.03.2011 22:16, Jakub Wilk wrote: >>> You do need -lgomp. >> >> You normally don't (need to) link to gomp explicitly. My wild guess is: >> Dmitry used -fopenmp while compiling *.o, but not when linking the >> shared library. > > Exactly! Thank you,

Re: ifupdown and IPv6

2011-04-01 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 31/03/2011 21:15, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:01:25 +0200 > m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote: > >> The problem is with all features implemented by external if-*.d >> scripts. If e.g. a bridge is created by the first defined afi, the >> second script will fai

Re: "expected stable-updates but got squeeze-updates"

2011-04-01 Thread Mark Hymers
On Thu, 31, Mar, 2011 at 08:25:38AM +, Philipp Kern spoke thus.. > On 2011-03-30, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > However, having "squeeze" in sources.list whilst the Release file > > contains "stable" works okay, so I assume apt is managing the > > translation internally in that case. > > Nah, th

hurd 0.401 is released!

2011-04-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, There are rumors that Duke Nukem Forever will actually be released in Apr^WMa^WJune 2011, so there's no escape for the Hurd any more, we had to finish and release. There has been considerable progress lately, so it is with great pleasure that the Hurd maintainers team decided to release ver

Re: Support for SMACK security framework

2011-04-01 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Russell and Christian, Russell Coker wrote on 2011-04-01 10:19: > > If you need some tips then I will be happy to offer some. I can also host > some developer resources if you need it (we can discuss that off-list). Thank you for your offer for tips and resources. > But you really have

Re: dh_shlibdeps warnings concerning undefined OpenMP symbols

2011-04-01 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
On 31.03.2011 22:16, Jakub Wilk wrote: >> You do need -lgomp. > > You normally don't (need to) link to gomp explicitly. My wild guess is: > Dmitry used -fopenmp while compiling *.o, but not when linking the > shared library. Exactly! Thank you, Jakub, for nice guess. AC_OPENMP() macro documentati

Bug#620333: ITP: naspro-bridge-it -- library to develop insert-your-API-here to LV2 bridges

2011-04-01 Thread Alessio Treglia
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alessio Treglia * Package name: naspro-bridge-it Version : 0.2.90 Upstream Author : Stefano D'Angelo * URL : http://naspro.atheme.org/naspro-bridge-it/ * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C Description : library t

Bug#620332: ITP: naspro-bridges -- collection of bridges to LV2

2011-04-01 Thread Alessio Treglia
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alessio Treglia * Package name: naspro-bridges Version : 0.2.90 Upstream Author : Stefano D'Angelo * URL : http://naspro.atheme.org/naspro-bridges * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C Description : collection of