Bug#621920: ITP: processing-core -- A Java animation and interaction library

2011-04-09 Thread Andrew Ross
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andrew Ross * Package name: processing-core Version : 1.2.1+svn7831 Upstream Author : Ben Fry, Casey Reas and others * URL : http://processing.org * License : LGPL Programming Lang: Java Description : A Java anim

Bug#621874: ITP: votca -- Versatile Object-oriented Toolkit for Coarse-graining Applications

2011-04-09 Thread Nicholas Breen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nicholas Breen * Package name: votca Version : 1.1.2 Upstream Author : VOTCA Developers * URL : http://www.votca.org/ * License : Apache License 2.0 Programming Lang: C++ Description : Versatile Object-oriented T

Re: Shipping /bin/sh [Re: Moving bash from essential/required to important?]

2011-04-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Bastian Blank writes: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:52:41PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: >> We have the same problem with awk since ages. We should fix both >> problems together. Therefor I propose the following: > > - An essential or pseudo-essential (dependency or pre-dependency from an > essen

Re: Shipping /bin/sh [Re: Moving bash from essential/required to important?]

2011-04-09 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 11:42:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > For now two packages will get such a script: > - base-files (setup of /usr/bin/awk) Err. I meant mawk. Bastian -- Earth -- mother of the most beautiful women in the universe. -- Apollo, "Who Mourns for Adonais?" st

Re: Shipping /bin/sh [Re: Moving bash from essential/required to important?]

2011-04-09 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:52:41PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > We have the same problem with awk since ages. We should fix both > problems together. Therefor I propose the following: - An essential or pseudo-essential (dependency or pre-dependency from an essential package) may include a new m

Re: More Vcs-Fields in debian/control?

2011-04-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 11:57:58AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > YAML is also used in other Debian processes, like for instance some reports > generated by the FTP team. All in all, I do not have the impression that the > use of YAML would cause difficulties to Debian packages maintainers. The f

Re: "Python2.6 as default"

2011-04-09 Thread Michael Checca
On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:49:17 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: On Saturday, April 09, 2011 01:26:12 PM Andreas Barth wrote: * Scott Kitterman (deb...@kitterman.com) [110409 19:07]: > Obviously that was a Squeeze goal. The equivalent goal for Wheezy should > be python2.7 as default and python

Re: "Python2.6 as default"

2011-04-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 01:26:12 PM Andreas Barth wrote: > * Scott Kitterman (deb...@kitterman.com) [110409 19:07]: > > Obviously that was a Squeeze goal. The equivalent goal for Wheezy should > > be python2.7 as default and python2.5 and python2.6 removed. > > Sure. Please feel free to fix t

Re: "Python2.6 as default"

2011-04-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 01:33:01 PM Michael Gilbert wrote: > Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I noticed that this is still listed at > > http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals. > > > > Obviously that was a Squeeze goal. The equivalent goal for Wheezy should > > be python2.7 as default and python2.5 an

Re: "Python2.6 as default"

2011-04-09 Thread Michael Gilbert
Scott Kitterman wrote: > I noticed that this is still listed at http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals. > > Obviously that was a Squeeze goal. The equivalent goal for Wheezy should be > python2.7 as default and python2.5 and python2.6 removed. Is it out of the question to target python3.x as the

Re: "Python2.6 as default"

2011-04-09 Thread Andreas Barth
* Scott Kitterman (deb...@kitterman.com) [110409 19:07]: > Obviously that was a Squeeze goal. The equivalent goal for Wheezy should be > python2.7 as default and python2.5 and python2.6 removed. Sure. Please feel free to fix that. Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.

"Python2.6 as default"

2011-04-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
I noticed that this is still listed at http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals. Obviously that was a Squeeze goal. The equivalent goal for Wheezy should be python2.7 as default and python2.5 and python2.6 removed. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a s

Re: Suggested release goal: /run

2011-04-09 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 30.03.2011 17:24, schrieb Tollef Fog Heen: > > (Please keep me in Cc, I'm not subscribed) > > Proposer: Tollef Fog Heen > Seconder: Michael Biebl > > Currently, /lib/init/rw exists as a place for applications that need > write access early (before $local_fs) to put their data. In addition,

Artık Herkesin Web Sitesi Olacak...

2011-04-09 Thread Web Sitesi Paketi
Web Sitesi Paketim Artık Herkesin Web Sitesi Olacak. antalya web tasarım www.websitesipaketim.com A:link { text-decoration: none; color: #00; } A:visited { text-decoration: none; color: #00; } A:active { text-decoration: none; color: #000

Re: System users: removing them

2011-04-09 Thread Lars Wirzenius
Adding a copy to the bug report. Everyone please Cc 621...@bugs.debian.org if replying to this subhtread. Thanks. On la, 2011-04-09 at 10:14 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 09:44:28AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > Package: debian-policy > > Version: 3.9.2.0 > > > > thanks

Re: Bug#621170: gnu-smalltalk: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs

2011-04-09 Thread Neil Williams
On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 11:25:34 +0200 Thomas Girard wrote: > Hello, > > regarding bug #621170 filed against gnu-smalltak for *.la removal, here > is the current situation: > > gnu-smalltalk packages contains /usr/lib/gnu-smalltalk/libc.la > > I'm attaching it here for the reference. Thanks.

Re: Bug#621761: ITP: khtmlib -- javascript library for browser maps

2011-04-09 Thread Andrew O. Shadoura
Hello, On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:41:16 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > * API uses WGS84 (GPS). This is illiterate a bit, WGS84 has nothing to do with GPS on its own. You can just say, 'API uses WGS84'. -- WBR, Andrew signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Need Links Any PR ANy theme

2011-04-09 Thread yatin kumar
Hello Webmasters I need Pr 2 and PR3 Links of any theme. Sites for Back links are - http://www.lapeches.com/home.php Pr2 http://www.lapeches.com/ Pr1 http://www.lapeches.com/bra.htmlPr0 http://www.buy-nexiumonline.com/

Bug#621170: gnu-smalltalk: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs

2011-04-09 Thread Thomas Girard
Hello, regarding bug #621170 filed against gnu-smalltak for *.la removal, here is the current situation: gnu-smalltalk packages contains /usr/lib/gnu-smalltalk/libc.la I'm attaching it here for the reference. Please note that the .la file is *not* in a -dev package. It's not intended to be us

Re: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy

2011-04-09 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 01:28:01PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I propose the following additions: > > 1) No uninstallable packages, according to their dependencies, are > > 2) No packages with (detectable) conflicts are shipped as part of a After Ralf's ack to document them for Wheezy,

Re: System users: removing them

2011-04-09 Thread Roger Leigh
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 09:44:28AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > Package: debian-policy > Version: 3.9.2.0 > > thanks > > Background for the policy list: see thread starting at > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/03/msg01174.html > and continuing in April at > http://lists.debian.org/deb

Re: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy

2011-04-09 Thread Neil McGovern
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:51:02AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > Retrospective > - > The first thing we would like to do is to consider how the previous > release went. We'd like to know what went well, what went badly, and > what to improve for the next release. > > Once again, we wi

Re: System users: removing them

2011-04-09 Thread Lars Wirzenius
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.9.2.0 thanks Background for the policy list: see thread starting at http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/03/msg01174.html and continuing in April at http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00210.html On ma, 2011-04-04 at 21:09 +0100, Lars Wirzenius

Bug#620458: marked as done (base-files: Please make /var/run world-writable and sticky, like /var/lock and /tmp)

2011-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 9 Apr 2011 10:00:13 +0200 with message-id <201104091000.14422.hol...@layer-acht.org> and subject line Re: Processed: Re: Bug#620458: base-files: Please make /var/run world-writable and sticky, like /var/lock and /tmp has caused the Debian Bug report #620458, regarding base-

Re: MBF Re: Bug#621277: ggz-grubby: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs

2011-04-09 Thread Andreas Metzler
Neil Williams wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 19:13:43 +0200 > Andreas Metzler wrote: >> On 2011-04-06 codeh...@debian.org wrote: >> > Package: ggz-grubby >> > Severity: normal >> > User: codeh...@debian.org >> > Usertags: la-file-removal >> > To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply w