The same question of removing the libxprint* (or libxp) packages applies
also to x11proto-print-dev.
Is there any reason to keep shipping x11proto-print-dev if we no longer
supply an Xprint server?
Drew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arnaud Fontaine
* Package name: xml_marshaller
Version : 0.9.7
Upstream Author : Nicolas Delaby
* URL : http://www.python.org/community/sigs/current/xml-sig/
* License : Python License (CNRI Python License)
Programmin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Josselin Mouette
* Package name: gnome-tweak-tool
Version : 3.0.0
Upstream Author : John Stowers
* URL : http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gnome-tweak-tool/
* License : GPL v3+
Programming Lang: Python
Descripti
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libutf8-all-perl
Version : 0.002
Upstream Author : Mike Doherty
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/utf8-all/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Henry-Nicolas Tourneur"
* Package name: exabgp
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Thomas Mangin
* URL : http://exabgp.googlecode.com/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : BGP route injector
T
Ralf Treinen (21/04/2011):
> * Package name: aspcud
> Version : 2011.03.17
> Upstream Author : Roland Kaminski
> * URL : http://www.cs.uni-potsdam.de/wv/aspcud/
> * License : GPL3+
> Programming Lang: C++
> Description : a CUDF solver based on answer se
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: aspcud
Version : 2011.03.17
Upstream Author : Roland Kaminski
* URL : http://www.cs.uni-potsdam.de/wv/aspcud/
* License : GPL3+
Programming Lang: C++
Description : a CUDF solver based
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vasudev Kamath
* Package name: bcrypt-ruby
Version : 2.1.4
Upstream Author : Coda Hale
* URL : http://bcrypt-ruby.rubyforge.org
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : OpenBSD's bcrypt() password has
On Thu, Apr 21 2011, Jamey Sharp wrote:
> - In libxcb master, I'd be happy to change configure.ac to default to
> not building xprint. I'd personally continue building it because I
> build all known extensions, just to check for build regressions, but
> there's no reason everybody else needs
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 04:22:17PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21 2011, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > cc: xcb maintainers: should you keep libxcb-xprint0 ? Do we need to talk
> > about this? libxcb-xprint0 has no relation (in a packaging sense) to
> > xprint.
>
> I see no harm providing it
On Thu, Apr 21 2011, Drew Parsons wrote:
> cc: xcb maintainers: should you keep libxcb-xprint0 ? Do we need to talk
> about this? libxcb-xprint0 has no relation (in a packaging sense) to
> xprint.
I see no harm providing it. It exists, so we can just let it be. Nothing
depends on it I guess, and
Hi,
I hope you are doing well.
I found your post on a website where you have mentioned about
your experience and interest in web development.
Can you help me in a HTML5 based web development.
This is a $450 project and I can offer this job to you
if you are interested.
For more details, clic
Xprint has been obsolete for some time now, and it's time to let it go
to rest. It was originally useful as a solution for printing non-latin
webpages from iceweasel 2, but that firefox problem has been fixed since
iceweasel 3 was released using cairo.
Xprint provided a kind a "wysiwig" API by wh
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 09:06:45AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
While we perhaps should make anything possible for our users, unless it
requires too effort from us, that does not mean that all users should be
confronted with every available option all the time. Having to choose
I agree. Would i
On to, 2011-04-21 at 16:20 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Josselin Mouette writes:
> > For example, Thunar works perfectly fine outside Xfce, but you don’t
> > want to show it in KDE or GNOME.
>
> Why not?
>
> Some users may prefer it to the "standard" app for the desktop
> environment they're usin
Josselin Mouette writes:
> For example, Thunar works perfectly fine outside Xfce, but you don’t
> want to show it in KDE or GNOME.
Why not?
Some users may prefer it to the "standard" app for the desktop
environment they're using.
-Miles
--
Politeness, n. The most acceptable hypocrisy.
--
To
16 matches
Mail list logo
