Salve a tutti.
Rapido sondaggio tra i DD italiani: tra quelli che pensano di andare a
Banja Luka a fine luglio c'è qualcuno che si è già fatto un'idea di come
viaggiare?
A me al momento la soluzione migliore (considerando un po' di cose, in
particolare praticità e costo) sembra quello di
On Tue, 03 May 2011, Stéphan Gorget wrote:
Solutions Linux approche à grand pas et j'ai finalement pu me libérer
pour venir mercredi donner un coup de main sur le stand. Est-ce qu'il
faut préparer des choses, où tout simplement arriver en avance où je
sais pas ?
Si tu as des choses sympas à
2011/5/4 Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org:
On Tue, 03 May 2011, Stéphan Gorget wrote:
Solutions Linux approche à grand pas et j'ai finalement pu me libérer
pour venir mercredi donner un coup de main sur le stand. Est-ce qu'il
faut préparer des choses, où tout simplement arriver en avance où
J'ai bien un cluster HPC de + de 200 Tflops (Environ 1300 noeuds).
Mais ca va pas être facile à déplacer.
Peut être en photos ?
Avec une note explicative sur la machine pour présenter des choses concrètes.
Est-ce qu'il y aura des panneaux pour mettre des posters ou affiches ?
--
To
On Wed, 4 May 2011 10:45:52 +0200, kaliderus kalide...@gmail.com
wrote:
J'ai bien un cluster HPC de + de 200 Tflops (Environ 1300 noeuds).
Mais ca va pas être facile à déplacer.
Peut être en photos ?
Avec une note explicative sur la machine pour présenter des choses concrètes.
Très bonne
On 04/05/11 at 09:27 +0200, Stéphan Gorget wrote:
2011/5/4 Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org:
On Tue, 03 May 2011, Stéphan Gorget wrote:
Solutions Linux approche à grand pas et j'ai finalement pu me libérer
pour venir mercredi donner un coup de main sur le stand. Est-ce qu'il
faut
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
Salut,
Si tu as des choses sympas à montrer faisant tourner Debian, tu peux les
emmener (plug computer, tablette, n900, ...). Sinon il n'y a besoin
de rien de spécial.
Attention à la fauche, tenez vos gadgets en laisse, ne les perdez jamais
des yeux,
2011/5/4 Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net:
On 04/05/11 at 09:27 +0200, Stéphan Gorget wrote:
2011/5/4 Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org:
On Tue, 03 May 2011, Stéphan Gorget wrote:
Solutions Linux approche à grand pas et j'ai finalement pu me libérer
pour venir mercredi donner un
On 04/05/11 at 14:16 +0200, Stéphan Gorget wrote:
2011/5/4 Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net:
On 04/05/11 at 09:27 +0200, Stéphan Gorget wrote:
2011/5/4 Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org:
On Tue, 03 May 2011, Stéphan Gorget wrote:
Solutions Linux approche à grand pas et j'ai
Bonsoir à tous,
je participe au développement de logiciels libres pour les écoles
primaires au travers du projet AbulÉdu.
Nous avons fait le choix de bosser sur Qt depuis un peu plus d'un an et
au fur et à mesure nous avançons dans différentes directions. En ce
moment je cherche des solutions
Le 04/05/2011 23:23, Laurent Fousse a écrit :
Bonjour,
* Éric Seigne [Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:00:34PM +0200]:
Pouvez-vous me confirmer qu'elle n'est pas libre au sens Debian/GNU ?
Je ne vois pas de problème spécifique du point de vue de Debian, c'est
une BSD 2-clauses.
Bonsoir Laurent, Cyril
Bonjour,
* Éric Seigne [Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:00:34PM +0200]:
Pouvez-vous me confirmer qu'elle n'est pas libre au sens Debian/GNU ?
Je ne vois pas de problème spécifique du point de vue de Debian, c'est
une BSD 2-clauses.
Pouvez-vous me confirmer qu'avec un tout petit peu de bonne volonté
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 01:23:12AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
That depends on what you mean by 'issue'. I think exactly the issues that
concern some people in Debian about packages of 'poor quality' being
generated
in an uncontrolled PPA system are happening with regularity in Ubuntu.
Mike Hommey, 2011-05-04 07:57:47 +0200 :
[...]
Add to that that allowing random people to upload packages to be built
on Debian build daemons is a recipe to have the buildds compromised.
My initial idea about how one would go about implementing them
involved very strict isolation of the
Le mardi 03 mai 2011 à 18:19 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
Where is your RFH bug?
I’m not the maintainer. I’m just one of the guys who happen to upload it
when it gets too outdated.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,
Heya,
Roland Mas lola...@debian.org writes:
Mike Hommey, 2011-05-04 07:57:47 +0200:
Add to that that allowing random people to upload packages to be built
on Debian build daemons is a recipe to have the buildds compromised.
My initial idea about how one would go about implementing them
On 4 May 2011 15:23, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
That depends on what you mean by 'issue'. I think exactly the issues that
concern some people in Debian about packages of 'poor quality' being
generated
in an uncontrolled PPA system are happening with regularity in Ubuntu.
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:42:16AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:10:48AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Sounds like http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12518
which is fixed (sort of) by commit 0354e355 (2011-04-01).
Oh my word. So glibc 2.13 breaks
[ Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org FYI ]
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 04:14:11PM -0300, gustavo panizzo wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: gustavo panizzo g...@zumbi.com.ar
* Package name: vavoom
Version : 1.32-1
Upstream Author : Janis Legzdinsh
schrieb Josselin Mouette am 2011-05-03 17:22:
Le mardi 03 mai 2011 à 15:56 +0200, Patrick Strasser a écrit :
Congratulations, you have added yet another bug on the pile that no one
ever reads, since there are no real maintainers for poppler.
Now that's really bad. Alternatives? Reporting
Package: general
Severity: normal
Even if through gnome-screensaver-preferences and gnome-power-preference I
disable the screensaver and the automatic turning off of the monitor, when I'm
away the monitor became blank and black.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.1
APT prefers
reassign 625538 gnome
thanks
On Mittwoch, 4. Mai 2011, Alessandro Sardone wrote:
Package: general
Severity: normal
Even if through gnome-screensaver-preferences and gnome-power-preference I
disable the screensaver and the automatic turning off of the monitor, when
I'm away the monitor
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2011-05-04 10:42:31 +0200 :
Heya,
Roland Mas lola...@debian.org writes:
Mike Hommey, 2011-05-04 07:57:47 +0200:
Add to that that allowing random people to upload packages to be built
on Debian build daemons is a recipe to have the buildds compromised.
My initial
reassign 625538 gnome-power-manager
merge 370692 625538
thanks
This is a known bug in gnome-power-manager.
Regards,
Roger
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:16:25AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
reassign 625538 gnome
thanks
On Mittwoch, 4. Mai 2011, Alessandro Sardone wrote:
Package: general
On Wed, 04 May 2011, Adam Borowski wrote:
I'd instead propose to sacrifice a tiny amount of cycles to check for
overlapping and abort()ing so buggy code can be fixed. Random instability
is the worst kind of error, a clean crash is easy to fix. Heck, we can even
make a change just before
Dear all,
I just uploaded into experimental a new version 0.42exp of debdelta (
you may find some binaries also in [3] ).
This version adds an experimental feature : if you call
'debdelta-upgrade' with the option '--format=unzipped' , then in the
recreated deb the data.tar part will not be
Le 04/05/2011 11:48, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
On Wed, 04 May 2011, Adam Borowski wrote:
I'd instead propose to sacrifice a tiny amount of cycles to check for
overlapping and abort()ing so buggy code can be fixed. Random instability
is the worst kind of error, a clean crash is easy to fix.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 625538 gnome-power-manager
Bug #625538 [general] general: Monitor turns off even if in gnome-screensaver
and gnome-power i disalbe automatic turning off.
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'gnome-power-manager'.
merge 370692
Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
Hi,
I'm with Linus on this: let's just revert to the old behaviour. A
tiny amount of clock cycles saved isn't worth the instability.
Tiny amount?! The optimized memcpy() variants that break shitty code
bring a 4 to 5x speedup on the processors they've
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 20:00 +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2011-04-24, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote:
Dear Release Team ... good luck in proposing a freeze month now :-)
I would propose mid september or mid-march. That's just after 2nd patch
release of new set of releases by
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 06:09:17PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Also the libc6-msp430-dev:all and libc6-dev:msp430 packages will both be
using /usr/inlcude/msp430 triplet/ and already trigger the problem you
fear.
No, libc6-msp430-dev would use
Josselin Mouette josselin.moue...@ens-lyon.org writes:
Le lundi 02 mai 2011 à 19:31 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
To those users that want newer software my next question would be What
software?. My feeling there is that it is only some software, allways
the same software and used
Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl writes:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:42:16AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
I'm with Linus on this: let's just revert to the old behaviour. A
tiny amount of clock cycles saved isn't worth the instability.
I'd instead propose to sacrifice a tiny amount of
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 05:32:41PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
On Tue, 03 May 2011, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
Or am I missing some substantial design issue which is still lacking
from http://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Guidelines
Sounds like the Debian Pure Blends [0] [1], with the
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:29:50PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
Hi,
I'm with Linus on this: let's just revert to the old behaviour. A
tiny amount of clock cycles saved isn't worth the instability.
Tiny amount?! The optimized memcpy() variants
You miss qucs for instance.
I suppose qt3 is near bug free ?
Could help to maintain but in team
Bastien
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
kdelibs3 was removed recently from the archive and the last tiny bit
of KDE 3 remaining, aRts, will be removed
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
kdelibs3 was removed recently from the archive and the last tiny bit
of KDE 3 remaining, aRts, will be removed quite soon.
This means the KDE team is not longer interested in Qt3 and we are looking
for new
On Wed, 04 May 2011, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Le 04/05/2011 11:48, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
So it's best if you consider unstable always in production-mode by
default.
So how do you plan to detect bugs if you never enable a feature?
Really abort()ing is not a nice behaviour, it would be way
Le 04/05/2011 14:06, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
a nice behaviour, it would be way better to print
a warning and fallback to a correct behaviour. Users can then report the
problems without experiencing a non working-application.
Printing a warning on a thing that is potentially used everywhere,
Hi,
during the recent discussions about rolling, a proposal was made in a
blog comment, and after giving it some quick thoughts, most people I’ve
talked with seem to think it is a good idea, so it’s time for it to be
discussed at large.
It starts from the following fact: if you want a testing
Le 04/05/2011 07:42, Steve M. Robbins a écrit :
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:10:48AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Sounds like http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12518
which is fixed (sort of) by commit 0354e355 (2011-04-01).
Oh my word. So glibc 2.13 breaks random binaries that
Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 14:23:19, Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
Le 04/05/2011 14:06, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
a nice behaviour, it would be way better to print
a warning and fallback to a correct behaviour. Users can then report the
problems without experiencing a non working-application.
[Abou Al Montacir, 2011-05-04]
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 20:00 +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2011-04-24, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote:
Dear Release Team ... good luck in proposing a freeze month now :-)
I would propose mid september or mid-march. That's just after 2nd patch
[Josselin Mouette, 2011-05-04]
This would be a pseudo-suite, like experimental. Except that while
experimental is built on top of unstable and filled manually by
maintainers, rolling would be built on top of testing and filled
semi-automatically. A rolling system would have typically 2 APT
Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
[Josselin Mouette, 2011-05-04]
This would be a pseudo-suite, like experimental. Except that while
experimental is built on top of unstable and filled manually by
maintainers, rolling would be built on top of testing and filled
semi-automatically. A rolling system would
Hi,
I came to the same conclusion than you after the discussion we had in
the comments of your article. I think it's the right approach. I still
have a few comments though.
On Wed, 04 May 2011, Josselin Mouette wrote:
It starts from the following fact: if you want a testing system that
works
[Didier Raboud, 2011-05-04]
While I agree with the demotivation stance, why can't those packages be
uploaded to experimental, fwiw ?
because that's not what experimental is for and it's harder to use it
(did you notice that python3.2 is in experimental or did someone gave
you proper
Message [o91db421774654d4eaeccd1845b56aa3d.pro] triggered rule [Anti-Virus
Malware Scanning (1)] at 4:04:20 PM 5/4/2011
Sender: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Recipient(s): mhan...@shb.com.sa
Subject: Returned mail: Data format error
Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 à 15:30 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
On Wed, 04 May 2011, Josselin Mouette wrote:
It starts from the following fact: if you want a testing system that
works correctly, you usually have to add APT lines for unstable, while
pinning them to only install specific
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:48:33AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
While I can sympathize with this (it's what I want as a developer), it's
certainly not a good idea in Debian in general: we have many derivatives
taking unstable/testing at various points in time, and we also want to make
testing
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
Le 04/05/2011 14:06, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
a nice behaviour, it would be way better to print
a warning and fallback to a correct behaviour. Users can then report the
problems without experiencing a non working-application.
Printing a warning
Le 04/05/2011 16:02, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
Le 04/05/2011 14:06, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
a nice behaviour, it would be way better to print
a warning and fallback to a correct behaviour. Users can then report the
problems without
On Wed, 04 May 2011, Josselin Mouette wrote:
It doesn't need to be a pseudo-suite. It's a collection of packages taken
in testing or unstable, it's not more complicated to make it a full suite.
It cannot be “just” a full suite. When you add a package coming from
unstable, you must also
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
This way, when something is broken in testing and cannot be unbroken
quickly, a maintainer who notices it could add (or make the people in
charge add) the necessary packages to the override file. If, for a
reason or another, an important bug fix or a
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
kdelibs3 was removed recently from the archive and the last tiny bit
of KDE 3 remaining, aRts, will be removed quite soon.
This means the KDE
Piotr Ożarowski dijo [Wed, May 04, 2011 at 03:22:07PM +0200]:
[Josselin Mouette, 2011-05-04]
This would be a pseudo-suite, like experimental. Except that while
experimental is built on top of unstable and filled manually by
maintainers, rolling would be built on top of testing and filled
Hi,
(you already know, but let's state that on dd@ too)
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org (04/05/2011):
during the recent discussions about rolling, a proposal was made in
a blog comment, and after giving it some quick thoughts, most people
I’ve talked with seem to think it is a good idea, so
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 08:28:00AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 01:23:12AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I believe Debian is quite correct to be
concerned about the potential for user confusion and damage to Debian's
reputation for high quality work.
PPAs
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 04:49:42PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 01:31:24PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 11:41:35AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
It is clear from the discussion that there would be consequences. Some
would be negative, some
Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 à 16:20 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
A full suite can have 2 versions of the same source package and
can contain both libgnomekbd4 and libgnomekbd7. It's not a problem.
OK, so I officially do not care a shit™.
What the britney-like thing could do is bring
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:24:12PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
The new “rolling” suite
---
This would be a pseudo-suite, like experimental. Except that while
experimental is built on top of unstable and filled manually by
maintainers, rolling would be built on top
Stefano Zacchiroli dijo [Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:56:15PM +0200]:
I think it would make quite sense to get something like e.g. ppa done for
Debian. But thats something else than it's proposed here.
Yes, absolutely. I'd even dare to say that having something like PPA for
Debian is a
Paul Tagliamonte dijo [Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:16:54AM -0400]:
AFAIU, only DD and DM could create PPA and upload to them. If this is not
the case, then I share your fears.
Usage of the PPA system on LP requires that you agree to the usage
terms (not unlike machine usage policies for
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt dijo [Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:42:31AM +0200]:
(...)
If anyone would have actually read the PPA proposal, they would know
that uploads were and are intended to be restricted to DDs and DMs
(which can break buildds anyway, if they want) and building should
happen in
On Wednesday, May 04, 2011 12:34:45 PM Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte dijo [Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:16:54AM -0400]:
AFAIU, only DD and DM could create PPA and upload to them. If this is
not the case, then I share your fears.
Usage of the PPA system on LP requires that you agree to
Hi,
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
The new “rolling” suite
---
This would be a pseudo-suite, like experimental. Except that while
experimental is built on top of unstable and filled manually by
maintainers, rolling would be built on top of testing and filled
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt dijo [Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:15:38AM +0200]:
I understand members of the release team feel particularly responsible to
do various release-critical tasks that should have been done by the
maintainers but haven't (for various reasons). And I guess that's the
reason of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen trei...@debian.org
* Package name: mccs
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Claude Michel c...@polytech.unice.fr
* URL : http://users.polytech.unice.fr/~cpjm/misc/mccs.html
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Jon Dowland j...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:48:33AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
While I can sympathize with this (it's what I want as a developer),
it's certainly not a good idea in Debian in general: we have many
derivatives taking unstable/testing at various points in
On 04/05/11 at 14:24 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Hi,
during the recent discussions about rolling, a proposal was made in a
blog comment, and after giving it some quick thoughts, most people I’ve
talked with seem to think it is a good idea, so it’s time for it to be
discussed at large.
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 03:30:40PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 04 May 2011, Josselin Mouette wrote:
It starts from the following fact: if you want a testing system that
works correctly, you usually have to add APT lines for unstable, while
pinning them to only install specific
Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 à 22:12 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
While I like the idea in general, I think that it should also be
possible to upload packages directly to rolling (through
rolling-proposed-updates). It will be useful in cases where neither the
package in testing, not the package
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:19:45PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 à 22:12 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
While I like the idea in general, I think that it should also be
possible to upload packages directly to rolling (through
rolling-proposed-updates). It will be
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:17:03PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
If you want to go ahead with patching britney, by all means go ahead, as
it might provide patches useful for the main brintey as well. But if you
want to try some alternatives, we can probably help.
I don't think you need to
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 01:23:12AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
PPAs as a developer tool are one thing, PPAs as a tool for random uploads, I
think are quite another. I'd hate to see Debian make the same mistake that
Canonical did in this regard.
PPA on Debian infrastructure should be
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
* Package name: morfeusz
Version : 20110416
Upstream Author : Zygmunt Saloni, Włodzimierz Gruszczyński,
Marcin Woliński, Robert Wołosz
* URL : http://sgjp.pl/morfeusz/
* License
* Pierre Habouzit [2011-05-04 22:23 +0200]:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:19:45PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 à 22:12 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
While I like the idea in general, I think that it should also be
possible to upload packages directly to rolling
On Wednesday, May 04, 2011 04:25:35 PM Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:24:12PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
What to do during freezes
-
If we want to do something different though, there is a simple recipe:
allow packages to be picked
What to do during freezes
-
I’m not sure we really need to do something different in times of
freeze. Our time would be better spent by reducing the freeze time and
making it more predictable; squeeze has been an awesome step in this
direction.
If we want to do
On 02/05/11 22:22, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
Hi!
On 02/05/2011 20:54, phantomjinx wrote:
Hi,
Someone with the handle 'mfv' came into the gtkpod irc channel wondering
about gtkpod dependencies as he was packaging it for debian.
It was me :-) Sorry if I didn't wait long enough for your
Hiya,
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:25:35PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:24:12PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
What to do during freezes
-
If we want to do something different though, there is a simple recipe:
allow packages to be
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:40 PM, sean finney sean...@debian.org wrote:
[...]
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:25:35PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:24:12PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
What to do during freezes
-
If we want to do
I've been trying to build a tomcat7 package based on the existing
tomcat6 package. After fiddling with it for a while, I've managed to
build what looks like a working binary, but I get a backtrace when the
services starts.
The relevant part of the backtrace is
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:29:50PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
Hi,
I'm with Linus on this: let's just revert to the old behaviour. A
tiny amount of clock cycles saved isn't worth the instability.
Tiny amount?! The optimized memcpy() variants
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 01:34:15PM +0200, sean finney wrote:
And furthermore, even if Debian chooses to fix this, upstreams will
be forced to eventually cater to the default glibc behavior for every
other libc distro out there that does not have their own fix (and
non-libc OS's where this
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:48:46PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
* Pierre Habouzit [2011-05-04 22:23 +0200]:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:19:45PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 à 22:12 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
While I like the idea in general, I think that it
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:05:22AM +0300, Cristian Henzel wrote:
What to do during freezes
-
I’m not sure we really need to do something different in times of
freeze. Our time would be better spent by reducing the freeze time and
making it more predictable;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 15:14:57 +0200
Source: bobcat
Binary: libbobcat2 libbobcat-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.15.00-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Frank B. Brokken f.b.brok...@rug.nl
Changed-By: Frank B.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 07:22:18 +0200
Source: expeyes
Binary: expeyes expeyes-firmware-dev python-expeyes expeyes-doc-en
expeyes-doc-fr
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Georges
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 07:31:48 +0200
Source: libnss-db
Binary: libnss-db
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.2.3pre1-3.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Piotr Roszatycki dex...@debian.org
Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 06:41:22 +0200
Source: svgalib
Binary: svgalib-bin libsvga1 libsvga1-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:1.4.3-31
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 18:57:16 +0200
Source: mpop
Binary: mpop mpop-gnome
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.24-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Emmanuel Bouthenot kol...@debian.org
Changed-By: Emmanuel Bouthenot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 15:18:20 +0200
Source: blender
Binary: blender blender-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.57.2-svn36339-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kevin Roy kin...@gmail.com
Changed-By: Kevin Roy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 11:04:55 +0200
Source: debdelta
Binary: debdelta
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.42exp
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: A Mennucc1 mennu...@debian.org
Changed-By: A Mennucc1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 10:01:30 +0200
Source: dpkg
Binary: libdpkg-dev dpkg dpkg-dev libdpkg-perl dselect
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.16.0.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Dpkg Developers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 10:24:20 -0700
Source: handlersocket
Binary: handlersocket-mysql-5.1 handlersocket-doc libhsclient-dev
libnet-handlersocket-perl
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.0.6-80-g88bf1e0-1
Distribution: unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 09:28:29 +0200
Source: jack-mixer
Binary: jack-mixer
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 9-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 10:10:29 +0200
Source: libopenraw
Binary: libopenraw-dev libopenraw1 libopenraw1-dbg libopenrawgnome1
libopenrawgnome-dev libopenrawgnome1-dbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0.8-3
Distribution: unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 17:50:09 +0900
Source: mew-beta
Binary: mew-beta mew-beta-bin
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 7.0.50~6.3.50+0.20110325-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Tatsuya Kinoshita t...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 12:23:01 +0400
Source: mhddfs
Binary: mhddfs
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.1.38
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dmitry E. Oboukhov un...@debian.org
Changed-By: Dmitry E. Oboukhov
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
