On Fri, 06 May 2011, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> Why is there no wheel group by default in Debian GNU/Linux?
Because we do not enable pam_wheel by default, so it is not needed by
default.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness gr
Why is there no wheel group by default in Debian GNU/Linux?
--
Eisenbits - proven software solutions: http://www.eisenbits.com/
OpenPGP: E3D9 C030 88F5 D254 434C 6683 17DD 22A0 8A3B 5CC0
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: lilv
Version : 0~3252
Upstream Author : David Robillard
* URL : http://drobilla.net/software/lilv/
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description : library for simple use o
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 07:48:45PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> * Pierre Habouzit [2011-05-05 07:46 +0200]:
> > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:48:46PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > > If more new upstream versions are uploaded to unstable (because they are
> > > targeted at rolling), it raises the number
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 12:51:33AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit writes:
>
> > On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 06:51:35PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Pierre Habouzit writes:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:19:45PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >> >> Le mercr
Pierre Habouzit writes:
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 06:51:35PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Pierre Habouzit writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:19:45PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> >> Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 à22:12 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
>> >> > While I like
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 10:39:29AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Yes, during the freeze I ran into trouble with OpenAFS because I had
>> too many different streams that I wanted to test at the same time. I
>> was using experimental for the upcoming 1.6 release, which I r
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 10:39:29AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois writes:
> > Jonathan Nieder (05/05/2011):
> >> I personally don't think uploading packages to experimental before it
> >> is time for them to participate in transitions to testing and integrate
> >> with the rest of
.. http://datafeast.portalgameblogger.com/link_friend.php?agoogle=x2py3
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/8cdd98342d85470-141c-a...@webmail-d115.sysops.a
On 12471 March 1977, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> What I expect to be needed is to make rolling a "real" suite that
>> retains packages. That will probably be needed sometimes. Though
>> packages only in rolling should be a transitory situation that the
>> rolling team is expected to minimize.
> E
gregor herrmann writes:
> Same idea: Would an experimental suite that's filled during the freeze
> to keep unstable free for RC bug fixes and migrates after the thaw plus
> (a) PPA(s) for experimenting (sic!) with newer releases help here?
Yes, absolutely. And PPAs would be really helpful for f
On Thu, 05 May 2011 17:46:34 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > Yeah, experimental is not really the good place. We really want in
> > rolling only packages where we have the assurance that they will land
> > in unstable the day after the release (so automatically and not with
> > a manual sourc
On Thu, 05 May 2011 10:39:29 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Being able to tell bug reporters “please check what happens with the X
> > stack in experimental” (which had more or less latest upstream release
> > candidates or releases), and closing with those versions; or forwarding
> > upstream if
On Thu, 05 May 2011, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 08:46:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Yeah, experimental is not really the good place. We really want in
> > rolling only packages where we have the assurance that they will land
> > in unstable the day after the releas
* Pierre Habouzit [2011-05-05 07:46 +0200]:
> On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:48:46PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > If more new upstream versions are uploaded to unstable (because they are
> > targeted at rolling), it raises the number of RC bugs needing to migrate
> > to testing through t-p-u. How wou
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> Jonathan Nieder (05/05/2011):
>> I personally don't think uploading packages to experimental before it
>> is time for them to participate in transitions to testing and integrate
>> with the rest of the next stable distribution is abuse at all. In fact
>> I wish people
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bouthenot
* Package name: sombok
Version : 2.0.5
Upstream Author : Hatuka*nezumi - IKEDA Soji
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/linefold/files
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : U
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 06:51:35PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit writes:
>
> > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:19:45PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >> Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 à 22:12 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> >> > While I like the idea in general, I think that it
Pierre Habouzit writes:
> On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:19:45PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 à 22:12 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
>> > While I like the idea in general, I think that it should also be
>> > possible to upload packages directly to rolling (through
>>
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 08:55:50AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
[snip]
> The point is not to paralyze Debian development, but you should never
> upload to unstable a package that you *know* is broken. Uploading to
> unstable means “this should be good enough for a stable release, but it
> hasn’t
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 08:46:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Yeah, experimental is not really the good place. We really want in
> rolling only packages where we have the assurance that they will land
> in unstable the day after the release (so automatically and not with
> a manual source uplo
Package: wnpp
Owner: Youhei SASAKI
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: fonts-ricty
Version : 2.0.2
Upstream Author : Yasunori Yusa
* URL or Web page : http://save.sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~yusa/fonts/ricty.html
* License : SIL Open Font License Ver.1.1 and M+ FONTS LICENSE and I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrea Colangelo
* Package name: key-mon
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Scott Kirkwood
* URL : https://code.google.com/p/key-mon/
* License : Apache License 2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Utility t
Jonathan Nieder (05/05/2011):
> I personally don't think uploading packages to experimental before
> it is time for them to participate in transitions to testing and
> integrate with the rest of the next stable distribution is abuse at
> all. In fact I wish people would do it more often.
Being a
On Thursday, May 05, 2011 08:03:39 AM Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Currently Experimental is the place to upload things not ready for use
> > except under very narrow circumstances. It gets abused as a place for
> > new versions during freeze as it is, but if it's the define
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Currently Experimental is the place to upload things not ready for use except
> under very narrow circumstances. It gets abused as a place for new versions
> during freeze as it is, but if it's the defined path into Rolling during
> freezes then there's a need to separ
Hi,
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 08:12:10PM -0430, Ernesto Hernández-Novich wrote:
> I've been trying to build a tomcat7 package based on the existing
> tomcat6 package. After fiddling with it for a while, I've managed to
> "build" what looks like a working binary, but I get a backtrace when the
> serv
On Wednesday, May 04, 2011 04:58:31 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 04, 2011 04:25:35 PM Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:24:12PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > What to do during freezes
> > > -
> > >
> > > If we want to do so
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:06:41 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2011, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > So how do you plan to detect bugs if you never enable a feature?
>
> Really abort()ing is not a nice behaviour, it would be way better to print
> a warning and fallback to a correct behavi
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:56:03AM +0200, sean finney wrote:
> Maybe valgrind already does checks like this [...]
It does.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
--
Hi,
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:56:27PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > And furthermore, even if Debian chooses to "fix" this, upstreams will
> > be forced to eventually cater to the default glibc behavior for every
> > other libc distro out there that does not have their own "fix" (and
> > non-
On 05/04/2011 12:20 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Just got 1 more package accepted, after waiting only 2 days! I then
> had a look at the NEW queue -- and I merely need to scroll! amazing
>
> Thanks you guys for your work -- that is awesome that there is virtually
> no queue backlog/waiting, an
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:07:28AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 08:58:31AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 05/05/11 at 08:51 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Le jeudi 05 mai 2011 à 08:23 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > > > > Could you please give a concrete e
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 08:58:31AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 05/05/11 at 08:51 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le jeudi 05 mai 2011 à 08:23 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > > > Could you please give a concrete example of where this would be needed?
> > > > I think all existing cases
On 05/05/2011 08:50 AM, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:05:22AM +0300, Cristian Henzel wrote:
>>> What to do during freezes
>>> -
>>> I’m not sure we really need to do something different in times of
>>> freeze. Our time would be better spent by reduc
On 05/05/11 at 08:51 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 05 mai 2011 à 08:23 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > > Could you please give a concrete example of where this would be needed?
> > > I think all existing cases should be covered by uploading directly to
> > > either t-p-u or unstabl
36 matches
Mail list logo
