Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexey
Hello! I'm working on 3 packages: rhash, librhash, librhash-dev
for the RHash program and its LibRHash library.
Package name: rhash
Version : 1.2.5
Upstream Author : Alexey
URL : http://rhash.sourceforge.net/
Lice
On 7 June 2011 15:56, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I would recommend asking the stable release manager. He might say yes.
What email address do I use?
(I always have problems finding the email addresses of the release
managers :-( )
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@l
]] Ben Finney
| Tollef Fog Heen writes:
|
| > ]] Ben Finney
| >
| > | Neither the VCS repository link nor the VCS browse link work for
| > | http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/comixcursors.html>.
| >
| > These have been fixed now.
|
| Not for me. The VCS repository link just gives a 404 error.
]] "Steve M. Robbins"
| Can the SVN ones be similarly fixed; e.g.
| http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/insighttoolkit.html
wsvn is already on the list of stuff still to fix as listed on
http://titanpad.com/yyhfwA9Pyr .
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friend
Tollef,
> ]] Ben Finney
>
> | Neither the VCS repository link nor the VCS browse link work for
> | http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/comixcursors.html>.
>
> These have been fixed now.
>
> | The VCS browse link doesn't work for
> | http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lojban-common.html>.
>
> Ditto.
Gr
Tollef Fog Heen writes:
> ]] Ben Finney
>
> | Neither the VCS repository link nor the VCS browse link work for
> | http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/comixcursors.html>.
>
> These have been fixed now.
Not for me. The VCS repository link just gives a 404 error.
(Note that the correct response will
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Plessy
Package name: bedtools
Version : 2.12.0
Upstream Author : Aaron Quinlan
URL : http://code.google.com/p/bedtools/
License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C++
Description : suite of utilities for com
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Petr Hlozek
* Package name: cqrlog
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Petr Hlozek , Martin Kratoska
* URL : http://www.cqrlog.com/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Object-Pascal (Lazarus)
Description : Advanced
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: dino
Version : 0.2.8
Upstream Author : Lars Luthman
* URL : http://dino.nongnu.org
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Integrated MIDI piano roll editor and sequenc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guillaume Mazoyer
* Package name: jtreg
Version : 4.1
Upstream Author : Sun Microsystems, Inc.
* URL : http://openjdk.java.net/jtreg/
* License : GNU General Public License, version 2, with the Classpath
Exception
Pro
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Jason Hsu wrote:
2. A trash program: GNOME and KDE come with trash/recycle bins but ROX
pinboard does not.
PCManFM with libfm has a trashbin. Lightweight enough?
--
/brother
http://martin.bagge.nu
On Bruce Schneier's birthday, a person standing at the very center of
Sto
* Don Armstrong (d...@debian.org) [110607 18:11]:
> On Tue, 07 Jun 2011, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Don Armstrong (d...@debian.org) [110607 04:25]:
> > > On Mon, 06 Jun 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > > I.e. I think we should still allow non-buildd binaries, e.g. for
> > > > those cases you mention
Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 10:46 +0100 schrieb Neil Williams:
> On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:34:30 +0200
> Vincent Danjean wrote:
>
> > > A few days ago, we had a discussion about a packaging-dev meta package.
> > > The responses were between neutral and positive. Therefore I created a
> > > initial
]] Ben Finney
| Neither the VCS repository link nor the VCS browse link work for
| http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/comixcursors.html>.
These have been fixed now.
| The VCS browse link doesn't work for
| http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lojban-common.html>.
Ditto.
(Now, loggerhead has fallen ov
>> - from maintainers POV, would you accept that?
>
> I've heard from very few people that would actually dislike it, but it
> would be the right way to go in so many senses.
The bugreport against the backported package at least needs to be
copied to whoever did the backport, which complicates th
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Don Armstrong (d...@debian.org) [110607 04:25]:
> > On Mon, 06 Jun 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > I.e. I think we should still allow non-buildd binaries, e.g. for
> > > those cases you mentioned.
> >
> > Non-buildd binaries should still be allowed, bu
Hey again,
* Mehdi Dogguy [2011-06-07 17:41:57 CEST]:
> Yes. But, one can still check and remove those tags when appropriate.
> My approach was just to avoid as much as possible to send false bugreports
> to the usual maintainer. The reporter can remove those tags if he's sure
> that it also a
On 07/06/2011 17:35, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>
> I think you misinterpret these release tags:
No.
> Setting them on a bug means that the bug affects only that specific
> release. It happens though quite regularly that bugs in backports
> aren't backport specific but also affect testing/unstable, a
Hey,
* Mehdi Dogguy [2011-06-07 17:02:50 CEST]:
> For now users of packages from BPO have to send a mail to
> debian-backports mailing-list, according to [1]. I don't know how you
> handle those bugs, but they seem very easy to miss (even if d-b@l.d.o
> isn't a high traffic list).
This is co
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Parent
* Package name: pkg-php-tools
* Version : 0.1
* Upstream Author : Mathieu Parent
* URL :
* License : LGPL-3.0
* Programming Lang: Perl, PHP
* Description : various packaging tools and scripts for PHP PEAR
I like this idea and also think that bugs reported against backports
package versions could be automatically directed towards the
backporter instead of the maintainer. First bugs.debian.org would have
to learn about backports package versions.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 17:02:50 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> >From a maintainer point of view, this could mean more burden. But, if ever
> implemented, debbugs can send a copy of the bugreport to the backporter
> only, and avoid sending it to the usual maintainer of the package.
>
That was discu
Hi.
For now users of packages from BPO have to send a mail to debian-backports
mailing-list, according to [1]. I don't know how you handle those bugs,
but they seem very easy to miss (even if d-b@l.d.o isn't a high traffic list).
I was wondering if it makes sense to ask (kindly) debbugs's mainta
On 11-06-07 at 12:54pm, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> On 05/06/2011 07:39, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:54:11 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >
> >> What I do is use upstream provided tarballs, then put aside
> >> autotools-generated files, then autogenerate myself, and in the
> >
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2011-06-07
Severity: wishlist
Package name: racktables
Version: 0.19.4
Upstream Author: Denis Ovsienko infrastat...@yandex.ru
URL: http://racktables.org/
License: GPL-2
https://sourceforge.net/projects/racktables/files/RackTables-0.19.4.tar.gz/download
Descrip
On 07/06/2011 14:36, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:54:23PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>> On 05/06/2011 07:39, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:54:11 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>
What I do is use upstream provided tarballs, then put aside
autotools-
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:54:23PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> On 05/06/2011 07:39, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:54:11 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >
> >> What I do is use upstream provided tarballs, then put aside
> >> autotools-generated files, then autogenerate myself
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James Page
* Package name: jcaptcha
Version : 2.0~alpha1
* URL : http://www.jcaptcha.net/
* License : LGPL-2.1
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Java framework for CAPTCHA definition and integration
(J)ava (C)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 629504 kfreebsd-source-8.1
Bug #629504 [general] general: Error during compiling kernel module at
generating file vnode_if.h.
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'kfreebsd-source-8.1'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
-I/usr/src/kfreebsd-source-8.1/sys/fs/puffs/puffs/../putter -DPUFFSDEBUG
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2
-mno-sse3 -ffreestanding -std=iso9899:1999 -c puffs_msgif.c In file
included from @/sys/vnode.h:563,
from puffs_msgif.c:44:
Stop in /us
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: machina
Version : 0~svn3366
Upstream Author : David Robillard
* URL : http://www.drobilla.net/software/machina/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : polyphonic MIDI
Hello, I have just noticed your requirement for Forum Posting
services. If the requirement is still open with you, I would love
to do this job. We are a dedicated team of talented writers who do
forum posting and blog commenting for our clients. We will
post you unique content on every for
On 05/06/2011 07:39, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:54:11 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> What I do is use upstream provided tarballs, then put aside
>> autotools-generated files, then autogenerate myself, and in the clean
>> rule put back the upstream-provided files (because I
On 2011-06-07, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jun 07, Brian May wrote:
>> I am doubtful it will get accepted in stable, because it isn't fixing
>> a grave bug.
> Sure it does: it fixes a serious interoperability problem, i.e. "breaks
> unrelated software".
Apart from debian-devel being the wrong venue
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:34:30 +0200
Vincent Danjean wrote:
> > A few days ago, we had a discussion about a packaging-dev meta package.
> > The responses were between neutral and positive. Therefore I created a
> > initial draft [1] and tried to incorporate all suggestions made in the
> > discussio
Hi,
On 05/06/2011 15:46, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A few days ago, we had a discussion about a packaging-dev meta package.
> The responses were between neutral and positive. Therefore I created a
> initial draft [1] and tried to incorporate all suggestions made in the
> discussion.
>
> T
On Jun 07, Brian May wrote:
> I am doubtful it will get accepted in stable, because it isn't fixing
> a grave bug.
Sure it does: it fixes a serious interoperability problem, i.e. "breaks
unrelated software".
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James Page
* Package name: robust-http-client
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Kohsuke Kawaguchi
* URL : http://java.net/projects/robust-http-client
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Robust HTTP
My Workaround is delete by hand IN,OUT,INOUT,WILLRELE!!
Package: general
Severity: minor
Warning: Object directory not changed from original
/usr/src/kfreebsd-source-8.1/sys/fs/puffs/puffs
awk -f @/tools/vnode_if.awk @/kern/vnode_if.src -p
awk -f @/tools/vnode_if.awk @/kern/vnode_if.src -q
awk -f @/tools/vnode_if.awk @/kern/vnode_if.src -h
cc -O2 -pi
* Don Armstrong (d...@debian.org) [110607 04:25]:
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > I.e. I think we should still allow non-buildd binaries, e.g. for
> > those cases you mentioned.
>
> Non-buildd binaries should still be allowed, but they should be
> followed immediately by a binNMU. [
* Brian May [2011-06-07 13:29:33 +1000]:
> Hello debian-devel,
>
> What should I do with this bug?
>
> I did build a version for unstable, but I am not convinced this change
> is needed for unstable.
Let me argue that it is still needed for the next Debian release. When
that comes out, squeeze w
42 matches
Mail list logo
