]] Russ Allbery
| Yeah, perl-modules really does depend on perl, in that the package is
| actively broken and will break other things, not just merely unusable,
| without it. Note that perl-modules has a ton of Provides, and something
| depending on one of those provided modules without dependin
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> On Mon, 05 Sep 2011, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le dimanche 04 septembre 2011 à 17:30 -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>>> I would like to see someone sort out what to do about perl and
>>> perl-modules before Policy makes it a requirement.
>> Is there anything special ab
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 04 septembre 2011 à 17:30 -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> > I would like to see someone sort out what to do about perl and
> > perl-modules before Policy makes it a requirement.
>
> Is there anything special about this case? It looks to m
Bill Allombert (03/09/2011):
> I would like to thanks all the developpers that have worked toward
> removing circular dependencies, and especially the X Strike Force and
> the Debian Java maintainers.
The X Strike Force would like to thank David Kalnischkies for his hints
about getting X packages
On 09/05/2011 10:13 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> Le samedi 03 septembre 2011 à 11:54 +0200, Bill Allombert a écrit :
>>> Today circular dependencies in unstable reached an all-time low, with
>>> only 40 circular dependencies.
>>
>> I think it should now be clear that there aren’t any such issues t
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 10:52:40AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> we're not very far from having hardening build flags set by default by
> dpkg-buildflags (waiting on some documentation update that Kees should
> take care of).
I'm about halfway through this. Just brushing up on my groff syntax. ;
> Le samedi 03 septembre 2011 à 11:54 +0200, Bill Allombert a écrit :
> > Today circular dependencies in unstable reached an all-time low, with
> > only 40 circular dependencies.
>
> I think it should now be clear that there aren’t any such issues that
> cannot be fixed, with more or less complic
Le dimanche 04 septembre 2011 à 17:30 -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> I would like to see someone sort out what to do about perl and
> perl-modules before Policy makes it a requirement.
Is there anything special about this case? It looks to me that the
perl-modules→perl dependency just needs to b
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 05:05:35PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I would recommend in the meantime to use a versioned URL of your
> choosing. As I believe is documented - the specific URL should be only
> an example.
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 05:56:25PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Until tha
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
> No idea, I have only integrated the work others have done in dpkg. I
> have not studied how other compilers support the hardening compilation
> flags.
>
> What are the compilers you're thinking of?
Here specifically, Clang.
More generally, at this point in time, a
Hi,
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Do we have a proper definition, and sample implementation(s) for “using
> > dpkg-buildflags properly”? On the top of my hat, it looks like semantics
> > and recommendations changed a bit over the years, so I kind of lost
>
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Do we have a proper definition, and sample implementation(s) for “using
> dpkg-buildflags properly”? On the top of my hat, it looks like semantics
> and recommendations changed a bit over the years, so I kind of lost
> count.
I'm going to prepare a "Bi
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
> Do we have a proper definition, and sample implementation(s) for “using
> dpkg-buildflags properly”? On the top of my hat, it looks like semantics
> and recommendations changed a bit over the years, so I kind of lost
> count.
On top of that, what's the story with re
Raphael Hertzog (05/09/2011):
> I would like to find one or two persons to lead a new release goal
> centered around hardening. The big goal is to have the maximum number of
> packages using hardening by the time Wheezy is released but it could
> include more specific sub-goals like "all packages
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 19:42:30 +0200 Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog schrieb:
> > Hello,
> >
> > we're not very far from having hardening build flags set by default by
> > dpkg-buildflags (waiting on some documentation update that Kees should
> > take care of).
>
> Thanks!
>
> > I would
Raphael Hertzog schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> we're not very far from having hardening build flags set by default by
> dpkg-buildflags (waiting on some documentation update that Kees should
> take care of).
Thanks!
> I would like to find one or two persons to lead a new release goal
> centered around ha
Hi,
as requested in bug #631592[1], we (ncurses maintainers) are going to
split out a new library package named libtinfo5 from the ncurses source
package and link both libncurses5 and libncursesw5 against that library.
This raises a small problem for upgrades from previous libncurses5
versions:
I
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 03:34:22PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> This is a minor issue,but I would propose to change it to
> http://svn.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=REVISION
> if the Format field should point to a specific svn version of the
> document. However, as far as
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
[...]
> I would recommend in the meantime to use a versioned URL of your
> choosing. As I believe is documented - the specific URL should be only
> an example.
FWIW, I have recently tried to put together a DEP5 compliant copyright
file for a package I'm working on. I say
On 11-09-05 at 03:34pm, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> The current version of DEP-5 encourages people to use versioned url
> for the Format: Field, as far as I can see from the description of
> this field, and the way the examples.
>
> However, using the proposed expression in the description of the
Hello,
Please Cc: me, I am not subscribed to this list.
The current version of DEP-5 encourages people to use versioned url for
the Format: Field, as far as I can see from the description of this
field, and the way the examples.
However, using the proposed expression in the description of the Fo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: volview
Version : 3.4.0
Upstream Author : Kitware
* URL : http://www.kitware.com/products/volview.html
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Advanced volume visual
Hello,
we're not very far from having hardening build flags set by default by
dpkg-buildflags (waiting on some documentation update that Kees should
take care of).
I would like to find one or two persons to lead a new release goal
centered around hardening. The big goal is to have the maximum num
23 matches
Mail list logo
