Kad Tu pirms tam ēdi melnos ikrus?
Protams - sen.. tāpēc, ka diezgan dārgi sanāk, pareizi?
Bet biezuči tos gardu muti ēd katru mīļu dienu - jo tas tak ir lieliski un
gardi..
He, Tu neesi tik turīgs?
Nepārdzīvo, skaties, kā biezuci tādu var kļūt:
http://www.klapki.net/images/biezucis.php
also sprach intrigeri [2011.09.11.2246 +0200]:
> The d-i already supports easy *full* system encryption, swap
> included.
I think this is what people should be using, not a high-level hack
like ecryptfs.
However, I suppose you can only set this up during installation, and
converting a system lat
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 641221 linux-2.6
Bug #641221 [general] Debian Squeeze problem with firewire_core (DV camera over
FireWire)
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'linux-2.6'.
> tags 641221 + moreinfo
Bug #641221 [linux-2.6] Debian Squeeze problem with
On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 21:12 +0200, matpro_fhkoeln wrote:
> Package: firewire_core
>
> Hello Ladies and Gentlemen,
>
> It seems, that one can't help anymore:
> http://www.linux-archive.org/debian-user/573831-debian-squeeze-problem-firewire_core-dv-camera-over-firewire.html
>
> Is this the right a
Hi,
Jon Dowland wrote (11 Sep 2011 13:23:37 GMT) :
> I like encrypted $HOME and making the use of them as easy for people
> as possible.
So do I.
However, before we go deep into implementation details, I need to ask
what kind of usecase(s) and threat model(s) you have in mind and are
trying to s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 641221 general
Bug #641221 [firewire_core] Debian Squeeze problem with firewire_core (DV
camera over FireWire)
Warning: Unknown package 'firewire_core'
Bug reassigned from package 'firewire_core' to 'general'.
> thanks
Stopping processin
* James Vega , 2011-09-11, 12:10:
* Package name: ordereddict
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Raymond Hettinger
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ordereddict/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : drop-in substitute for collections f
Den 11. sep. 2011 16:00, skrev Kai Wasserbäch:
> (@Ove: I've already a multiarch-ready branch on my system which uses a
> significantly simplified debian/rules. If you are interested in that, let me
> know and I put it up somewhere.)
Not really. I always try to keep the packages possible to build
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 05:31:18PM +0200, fladischermich...@fladi.at wrote:
> * Package name: ordereddict
> Version : 1.1
> Upstream Author : Raymond Hettinger
> * URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ordereddict/
> * License : MIT
> Programming Lang: Python
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: fladischermich...@fladi.at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: ordereddict
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Raymond Hettinger
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ordereddict/
* License : MIT
Pr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "TUDURI Benoît"
* Package name: sdp-s
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Frederic Roupin
* URL : http://deptinfo.cnam.fr/~roupinf/SDPS/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description : Semidefinite relaxation
Dear Cesare, dear Ove,
Ove Kåven schrieb am 11.09.2011 14:56:
> Den 11. sep. 2011 13:44, skrev Cesare Leonardi:
>> In the recent past upstream site started to advertise this as Wine Debian
>> package: http://dev.carbon-project.org/debian/wine-unstable/
I had nothing to do with that, I actually wa
I like encrypted $HOME and making the use of them as easy for people
as possible.
On creation of the first user, Ubuntu's installer offers a checkbox
labelled something like "Encrypt the user's files". That's it: just
one check-box. If set, upon login, a PAM module unlocks and mounts a
loopback d
On 11/09/2011 14:56, Ove Kåven wrote:
Because of the work and time needed for compliance with Debian's strict
DFSG requirements (in addition to having to package a full mingw
toolchain to compile it, upstream's Gecko package had to undergo a
repackaging for DFSG compliance, plus a complete licens
Den 11. sep. 2011 13:44, skrev Cesare Leonardi:
> Upstream is 1.2.3 (stable) and 1.3.28 (development) and they looks like
> quite active releasing new versions.
Of course.
> In Debian we have two Wine packages:
> - wine 1.0.1 (1.1.24 in experimental)
> - wine-unstable 1.1.35
It's slightly newe
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
> I'd like to know if someone has more info on the Wine package status.
> From the outside and after searching from time to time on the internet, it's
> still not clear to me what's the reason why this package is so old.
It is probably a bet
Hi all.
I'd like to know if someone has more info on the Wine package status.
From the outside and after searching from time to time on the internet,
it's still not clear to me what's the reason why this package is so old.
Upstream is 1.2.3 (stable) and 1.3.28 (development) and they looks like
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rico Rommel
* Package name: qfsodbusxml2cpp
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author :
2011 Simon Busch
2011 Radek Polak
2008-2009 Nokia Corporation and/or its subsidiary(-ies).
1994-2008 Trolltech ASA.
* Kurt Roeckx (k...@roeckx.be) [110910 15:38]:
> We changed this some time ago and made $arch readable by anybody,
> the mbox's are at:
> buildd.debian.org:/org/buildd.debian.org/mbox/
>
> We've ask the security team to use wb-t...@buildd.debian.org
> instead, which is not public available.
Ok wi
19 matches
Mail list logo
