[ Bccing the maintainers of packages quoted in this mail ]
Hi,
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> * There are some new trigger directives ("interest-noawait" and
> "activate-noawait") that work like the existing directives except
> that packages activating the triggers are not put
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 05:14:32PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> >> > I hope Debian would honour the Social Contract and put the needs of the
> >> > users ahead of software freeness concerns in that case.
> >>
> >> Do we have a name for the DFSG equivalent of Godwin's Law? Because
Hi Bruce,
>> > I hope Debian would honour the Social Contract and put the needs of the
>> > users ahead of software freeness concerns in that case.
>>
>> Do we have a name for the DFSG equivalent of Godwin's Law? Because you
>> just failed it.
>
> Well, that's disappointing... called a Nazi for d
On September 22, 2011 12:23:00 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 11-09-22 at 08:19am, Bruce Sass wrote:
> > On September 22, 2011 02:50:25 AM Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > > * Bruce Sass [2011-09-21 23:18:54 CEST]:
> > > > Debian already favours Main packages by default
> > >
> > > Not if the alterna
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:25:06PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > I know that the buildd system likes to pull in the first package in
> > such an alternative dependency chain. And now I start to wonder:
> > Is it allowed for a package in main to have a package _outside_ of main
> > as first c
On September 22, 2011 12:06:11 PM Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 08:19:32AM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> > > So *every* time a package outside of main is an installation candidate
> > >
> > > the decision should be made, not once, very much indeed.
> >
> > As someone who doesn't c
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 01:12:37PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Policy is clear on packages in main aren't allowed to depend on
> packages outside of main. Now in a fair amount of cases this has been
> worked around by having the package outside of main as alternative
> depende
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Banck
* Package name: aces2
Version : 2.8.0
Upstream Author : Quantum Theory Project, University of Florida
* URL : http://www.qtp.ufl.edu/ACES
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Fortran
Description : Advan
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 13:56:47 -0500, Jeffrey G Thomas wrote:
> > > chgrp -R staff /home/wvincent/public_html/lps/sites
> > > chgrp: changing group of
> > > `/home/wvincent/public_html/lps/sites/default/files/feeds/studiolocations.csv':
> > > Operation not permitted
> >
> > I'm afraid that so
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:52:30 +0200
with message-id <20110922185230.ga8...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#642452: SetUID-enabled binary doesn't run as root
has caused the Debian Bug report #642452,
regarding SetUID-enabled binary doesn't run as root
to be marked as
On 11-09-22 at 05:03pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> On 22/09/2011 16:54, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > I think this would be better as libnode-which
> It will probably be named "libnode-which" but i started a discussion
> on pkg-javascript-devel about that naming scheme [1]
Until that other discussion eve
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 642452 general
Bug #642452 [setuid] SetUID-enabled binary doesn't run as root
Warning: Unknown package 'setuid'
Bug reassigned from package 'setuid' to 'general'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
On 11-09-22 at 08:19am, Bruce Sass wrote:
> On September 22, 2011 02:50:25 AM Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > * Bruce Sass [2011-09-21 23:18:54 CEST]:
> > > Debian already favours Main packages by default
> >
> > Not if the alternative dependency chain has a non-free package
> > first. I know what yo
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 08:19:32AM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> > So *every* time a package outside of main is an installation candidate
> > the decision should be made, not once, very much indeed.
> As someone who doesn't care about licences
Since this effectively translates to not caring about t
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 at 14:13:31 -0500, Mike Mestnik wrote:
I'd like to start a movement to verify and assist projects/packages
with the proper deployment of software that supports proxies.
In GLib-based applications, connecting using GSocketClient while having
glib-networking installed will aut
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 at 18:31:46 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> See libproxy package
> Le 22 sept. 2011 12:10, "Simon McVittie" a écrit :
> In GLib-based applications, connecting using GSocketClient while having
> glib-networking installed will automatically use a configured proxy
FYI, that cu
I`ll check it out, thanks.
See libproxy package
It could be improved but it. Work
Bastien
Le 22 sept. 2011 12:10, "Simon McVittie" a écrit :
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 at 14:13:31 -0500, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> I'd like to start a movement to verify ...
In GLib-based applications, connecting using GSocketClient while having
glib
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 at 16:50:43 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> By no means it is a replacement to existing 'which' tools, and no executable
> would be provided, only a library file.
Please use a short description that makes it look like a library rather
than calling it "a utility", then (or a module o
On 22/09/2011 16:54, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 at 15:34:31 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>>> node-which finds the first instance of a specified executable
>>> in the PATH environment variable.
>>
>> How does this differ from
On 22/09/2011 16:38, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 at 15:34:31 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> node-which finds the first instance of a specified executable
>> in the PATH environment variable.
>
> How does this differ from:
>
> * the 'which' utility in debianutils (which is Essential:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 at 15:34:31 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> node-which finds the first instance of a specified executable
>> in the PATH environment variable.
>
> How does this differ from:
>
> * the 'which' utility in debianutils (which is
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 at 15:34:31 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> node-which finds the first instance of a specified executable
> in the PATH environment variable.
How does this differ from:
* the 'which' utility in debianutils (which is Essential: yes)
* the 'which' builtin in shells that have copied
On 22/09/2011 16:04, Andrew O. Shadura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:34:31 +0200
> Jérémy Lal wrote:
>
>> Description : which-like utility for Node
>
> Why not make a single package e.g. node-utils which would include many
> such small libraries, just like tcllib does? I supp
On September 22, 2011 02:50:25 AM Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Bruce Sass [2011-09-21 23:18:54 CEST]:
> > On September 20, 2011 02:24:33 PM Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 01:12:37PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > > > tl;dr - what do you think, is a "Depends: foo-contrib |
Hello,
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:34:31 +0200
Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Description : which-like utility for Node
Why not make a single package e.g. node-utils which would include many
such small libraries, just like tcllib does? I suppose most of those
script aren't or particularly big size so shi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Jérémy Lal"
* Package name: node-which
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Isaac Z. Schlueter
* URL : https://github.com/isaacs/node-which
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Description : which-like u
[Dropping most of the CCs.]
Dear Mr. Busson,
bastien.bus...@dga.defense.gouv.fr schrieb am 22.09.2011 11:16:
> We would be very pleased to see a TranscriberAG package be part of the
> repositories as many people, especially from the research community, hope
> after the removal of the Transcriber
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 at 14:13:31 -0500, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> I'd like to start a movement to verify and assist projects/packages
> with the proper deployment of software that supports proxies.
In GLib-based applications, connecting using GSocketClient while having
glib-networking installed will au
Dear ftpmasters, package developers and maintainers,
The Transcriber package (http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/transcriber.html)
was removed last year.
The reasons were:
Please remove transcriber:
- orphaned for more than 3.5 years, last maintainer upload in 2005
- dead upstream (last release from
* Bruce Sass [2011-09-21 23:18:54 CEST]:
> On September 20, 2011 02:24:33 PM Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 01:12:37PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > > tl;dr - what do you think, is a "Depends: foo-contrib | foo" acceptable
> > > for packages in main or should it be "Depe
31 matches
Mail list logo
