Davide Prina writes:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On 21/02/2012 15:30, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
>> I support the dak change to split off the long descriptions into their
>> own files.
>
> Packages (P) and Translation-en (T) have some differences, I don't
> understand that there are correct:
> * some packages are in
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 01:39:13AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:00:30AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Your complaint, then, is against those who use the law to restrict your
> > use of your legally-acquired DVD or Blu-Ray disc and disingenuously call
> > it “protection”.
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:00:30AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Eric Valette writes:
> > With actual policy (that I respect and understand), you are not going
> > to provide stuff to circumvent protection means meaning I cannot watch
> > even a dvd.
>
> Your complaint, then, is against those who us
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 06:53:29PM +0100, Davide Prina wrote:
> * some packages are in T and P but with different versions (libace-6.0.1);
> * some packages have more versions in T than in P (eog-plugins);
I can not confirm these two specific packages. However, the importer of
translations into U
Eric Valette writes:
> Thanks for not copying me. Afraid I was going to answer?
This mailing list, like all sensibly-run mailing lists, does not munge
the ‘Reply-To’ field. If you have a conversation in a public forum, the
onus is on you to participate in the discussion in that public forum.
>
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:13:38 +0100
Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> On 2012-03-04 00:29, Neil Williams wrote:
> >> opensync/multisync is a complete mess, collecting 25 RC bugs between 20
>
> > Was so busy preparing the summary, didn't notice that the maintainer
> > had already come back t
Selamat Pagi
Kami Arsindo Cipta Karya merupakan perusahaan jasa Arsitektur, interior dan
Kontraktor yang menggabungkan desain hingga pelaksanaan pembangunan rumah
tinggal, ruko, kantor dan lain2 menjadi satu paket, sehingga mempermudah anda
mulai dari desain hingga pelaksanaan dalam mewujudkan
Hi Neil,
On 2012-03-04 00:29, Neil Williams wrote:
>> opensync/multisync is a complete mess, collecting 25 RC bugs between 20
> Was so busy preparing the summary, didn't notice that the maintainer
> had already come back to me on IRC. Filing the RM bugs tonight.
Now that this has been removed fr
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 18:53 +0100, Davide Prina wrote:
> Packages (P) and Translation-en (T) have some differences, I don't
> understand that there are correct:
> * some packages are in P, but not in T (today I don't found one);
> * some packages are in T, but not in P (lib32z1);
Which architectu
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 06:53:29PM +0100, Davide Prina wrote:
> >I support the dak change to split off the long descriptions into their
> >own files.
>
> Packages (P) and Translation-en (T) have some differences, I don't
> understand that there are correct:
> * some packages are in P, but not in T
Hi Ian,
On 21/02/2012 15:30, Ian Jackson wrote:
I support the dak change to split off the long descriptions into their
own files.
Packages (P) and Translation-en (T) have some differences, I don't
understand that there are correct:
* some packages are in P, but not in T (today I don't found
On 12-03-10 at 04:39pm, Eric Valette wrote:
> >> take a look at yavdr, openelec, geexbox, ubuntu studio and the
> >> packages they provide
> >>
> >>
> >> Readhttp://thelinuxcauldron.wordpress.com/2009/04/14/the-list-the-top-5-media-center-programs-for-linux/
> >> and see the one you have.
> >
> take a look at yavdr, openelec, geexbox, ubuntu studio and the
> packages they provide
>
>
Readhttp://thelinuxcauldron.wordpress.com/2009/04/14/the-list-the-top-5-media-center-programs-for-linux/
> and see the one you have.
Ahh, so your definition of "serious multimedia" is "media centers"
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Giulio Paci
* Package name: m2m-aligner
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Sittichai Jiampojamarn
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/m2m-aligner/
* License : MIT (http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php)
Program
On 12-03-10 at 01:34pm, Eric Valette wrote:
> On 10/03/2012 12:40, Philip Hands wrote:
>
> >Really?
>
> Again, vlc or mplayer do not make a multi-media capable distribution.
>
> take a look at yavdr, openelec, geexbox, ubuntu studio and the
> packages they provide
>
> Read
> http://thelinuxca
On 12-03-10 at 12:30pm, Eric Valette wrote:
> Yes acknowledged that vlc and mplayer are now up-to-date.
>
> Libav vs ffmpeg could be per se part of the debate. We could also
> speak about compilation options and induced feature/codec support
>
> what about xbmc, mythv, tvheadend, avidemux?
Well
On 10/03/2012 12:40, Philip Hands wrote:
Really?
Again, vlc or mplayer do not make a multi-media capable distribution.
take a look at yavdr, openelec, geexbox, ubuntu studio and the packages
they provide
Read
http://thelinuxcauldron.wordpress.com/2009/04/14/the-list-the-top-5-media-center
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:44:50 +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
> On 10/03/2012 11:14, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> > In where? Stable? SID? Backports? FYI, you can check all
> > of this easily by yourself using packages.debian.org. Or
> > are you trying to make the point that Debian has outdated
> > packag
Yes acknowledged that vlc and mplayer are now up-to-date.
Libav vs ffmpeg could be per se part of the debate. We could also speak
about compilation options and induced feature/codec support
what about xbmc, mythv, tvheadend, avidemux?
-- eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ..
On 10/03/2012 12:03, Eric Valette wrote:
On 10/03/2012 11:44, Eric Valette wrote:
I know the version already yes. And yes debian is completely outdated.
To be fair, but catching up at least for vlc, mplayer...
Still no xbmc, handbrake, libdvbcsa tough and quite old ffmpeg
mythtv, tvheadend
On 10/03/2012 11:44, Eric Valette wrote:
I know the version already yes. And yes debian is completely outdated.
To be fair, but catching up at least for vlc, mplayer...
Still no xbmc, handbrake, libdvbcsa tough and quite old ffmpeg
-- eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 11:44 +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
> I ask you a question: what are the version of the packeges in debian
> unstable and in debian-multimedia.org trying to be factual. I know the
> answer, I just would like someone from debian to write it down ;-)
>
> I know the version alrea
On 10/03/2012 11:14, Thomas Goirand wrote:
In where? Stable? SID? Backports? FYI, you can check all
of this easily by yourself using packages.debian.org. Or
are you trying to make the point that Debian has outdated
packages?
I ask you a question: what are the version of the packeges in debian
On 03/10/2012 05:07 PM, Eric Valette wrote:
> The problem is that debian per se
> 1) is unusable for any serious multimedia usage.
1/ I don't agree.
2/ Please define "serious".
> what are the version of VLC, ffmpeg, xbmc provided by debian?
In where? Stable? SID? Backports? FYI, you can chec
While debian-multimedia.org has gained a reputation of providing
packages, which were desperately lacking in Debian,
IMO this repository has turned into a major source of trouble and
pissed users provoking flamewars in the recent past. There is still a
number of remaining multimedia-related packag
25 matches
Mail list logo
